The etiology of the occurrence of en banc review in the U.S. Court of Appeals

American Journal of Political Science

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 449-463

  Giles, Micheal W ^a   Hettinger, Virginia A ^b   Zorn, Christopher ^c   Peppers, Todd C ^d  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d ROANOKE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250612922     PISSN: 00925853     EISSN: 15405907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00261.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abramowicz, Michael. 2000 En Banc Revisited Columbia Law Review 100 (6 1600 41.
2. Atkins, Burton. 1972 Decision-making Rules and Judicial Strategy on the United States Courts of Appeals Western Political Quarterly 25 (4 626 42.
3. Bachrach, Peter, and Morton S. Baratz. 1962 Two Faces of Power American Political Science Review 56 (4 947 52.
4. Banks, Christopher P. 1997 The Politics of En Banc Review in the 'Mini-Supreme Court.' Journal of Law and Politics 13 (2 377 414.
5. Banks, Christopher P. 1999. Judicial Politics in the D.C. Circuit. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Barrow, Deborah J., and Thomas G. Walker. 1988. A Court Divided: The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Politics of Judicial Reform. New Haven : Yale University Press.
7. Baumgartner, Frank, and Bryan Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
8. Bennett, Steven, and Christine Pembroke. 1985-86 'Mini' in Banc Proceedings: A Survey of Circuit Practices Cleveland State Law Review 34 (4 531 65.
9. Blackstone, Bethany, and Susan Navarro. 2006 Regime Change and Decision-making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals Presented at the 2006 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Conference.
10. Caldeira, Gregory A., and John R. Wright. 1988 Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court American Political Science Review 82 (4 1109 27.
11. Caldeira, Gregory A., John R. Wright, and Christopher Zorn. 1999 Sophisticated Voting and Gate-Keeping in the Supreme Court Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 (3 549 72.
12. Cameron, Charles M., Jeffrey A. Segal, and Donald Songer. 2000 Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions American Political Science Review 94 (1 101 16.
13. Cross, Frank. 1997 Political Science and the New Legal Realism: A Case of Unfortunate Interdisciplinary Ignorance Northwestern University Law Review 92 (1 251 326.
14. Cross, Frank B., and Emerson H. Tiller. 1998 Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals Yale Law Journal 107 (7 2155 76.
15. Edwards, Harry. 1998 Collegiality and Decision Making on the D.C. Circuit Virginia Law Review 84 (7 1335 70.
16. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC : CQ Press.
17. George, Tracey, and Michael Solimine. 2001 Supreme Court Monitoring of the United States Courts of Appeals En Banc Supreme Court Economic Review 9 : 171 204.
18. Giles, Micheal W., Virginia A. Hettinger, and Todd Peppers. 2001 Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas Political Research Quarterly 54 (3 623 41.
19. Giles, Micheal W., Thomas G. Walker, and Christopher Zorn. 2006 Setting a Judicial Agenda: The Decision to Grant En Banc Review in the U.S. Courts of Appeals Journal of Politics 68 (4 852 66.
20. Ginsburg, Douglas, and Donald Falk. 1991 The Court En Banc : 1981 1990 George Washington Law Review 59 (5 1008 91.
21. Goldman, Sheldon. 1997. Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection from Roosevelt through Reagan. New Haven : Yale University Press.
22. Hellman, Arthur. 1990 Maintaining Consistency in the Law of the Large Circuit In Restructuring Justice, ed. Arthur Hellman. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
23. Hettinger, Virginia A., Stefanie Lindquist, and Wendy Martinek. 2004 Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals American Journal of Political Science 48 (1 123 37.
24. Howard, J. Woodford. 1981. Courts of Appeals in the Federal Judicial System: A Study of the Second, Fifth and District of Columbia Courts. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
25. Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York : Harper-Collins.
26. Klein, David E. 2002. Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeals. New York : Cambridge University Press.
27. Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York : Cambridge University Press.
28. Note. 1989 The Politics of En Banc Review Harvard Law Review 102 (4 864 84.
29. Pacelle, Richard. 1991. The Transformation of the Supreme Court's Agenda. Boulder, CO : Westview Press.
30. Perry, H. W. 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda-Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
31. Pinello, Daniel R. 1999 Linking Party to Judicial Ideology in American Courts: A Meta-Analysis Justice System Journal 20 (3 219 54.
32. Poole, Keith T. 1998 Recovering a Basic Space from a Set of Issue Scales American Journal of Political Science 42 (3 954 93.
33. Rowland, C. K., and Robert A. Carp. 2000. Politics and Judgment in Federal District Courts. Lawrence : University of Kansas Press.
34. Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
35. Schick, Marvin. 1970. Learned Hand's Court. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
36. Schwartz, Herman. 1988. Packing the Courts: The Conservative Campaign to Rewrite the Constitution. New York : Scribner.
37. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York : Cambridge University Press.
38. Shavell, Steven. 1995 The Appeals Process as a Means of Error Correction Journal of Legal Studies 24 (2 379 426.
39. Shavell, Steven. 2006 The Appeals Process and Adjudicator Incentives Journal of Legal Studies 35 (1 1 29.
40. Smith, Joseph, and Emerson Tiller. 2002 The Strategy of Judging: Evidence from Administrative Law Journal of Legal Studies 31 (1 61 82.
41. Solimine, Michael. 1988 Ideology and En Banc Review North Carolina Law Review 67 (1 29 76.
42. Songer, Donald R., and Susan Haire. 1992 Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting: Obscenity Cases in the U.S. Courts of Appeals American Journal of Political Science 36 (4 963 82.
43. Songer, Donald R., Reginald S. Sheehan, and Susan B. Haire. 2000. Continuity and Change on the United States Courts of Appeals. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
44. Ulmer, S. Sidney. 1984 The Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions: Conflict as a Predictive Variable American Political Science Review 78 (4 901 11.
45. Van Winkle, Steven R. 1996 Three-Judge Panels and Strategic Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals Presented at the Conference on the Scientific Study of Judicial Politics, Washington University.
46. Wasby, Stephen. 1979 Inconsistency in the United States Courts of Appeals: Dimensions and Mechanisms for Resolution Vanderbilt Law Review 32 (6 1343 73.
47. Wermiel, Stephen. 1988 Full-Court Review of Panel Rulings Becomes Tool Often Used by Reagan Judges Aiming to Mold Law Wall Street Journal, March 22 : 70.
48. Zorn, Christopher. 2001 Generalized Estimating Equation Models for Correlated Data: A Review with Applications American Journal of Political Science 45 (2 470 90.
49. Zuk, Gary, Deborah Barrow, and Gerard Gryski. 1996. Multi-User Database on the Attributes of U.S. Appeals Court Judges, 1801-1994. Ann Arbor : ICPSR 6796.