Sector-based analysis of frequency doubling technology sensitivity and optic nerve head shape parameters

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 223-229

  Iester, Michele ^a   Sangermani, C ^b   De Feo, F ^a   Ungaro, N ^b   Cicinelli, S ^a   Tardini, M G ^b   Calabria, G ^a   Gandolfi, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^b University Eye Clinic of Parma   (Italy)

Author keywords

Confocal scanning laser; Frequency doubling technology; Heidelberg retina tomograph; Indices; Nonconventional perimetry; Standard threshold perimetry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC DISK CUP; OPTIC NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA FOVEA; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

EID: 34250379180     PISSN: 11206721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112067210701700212     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Kamal DS, Viswanthan AC, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Detection of optic disc change with the HRT before confirmed visual field change in ocular hypertensives converting to early glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 290-4.
2. Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1492-9.
3. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthlamol 1998; 125: 819-29.
4. Sponsel WE, Arango S, Trigo Y, Mensah J. Clinical classification of glaucomatous visual field loss by frequency doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthlamol 1998; 125: 830-6.
5. Iester M, Altieri M, Vittone P, et al. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect by nonconventional perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135: 35-9.
6. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Courthright P, Drance SM. Correlation between the visual field indices and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameters. J Glaucoma 1997; 6: 78-82.
7. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1557-63.
8. Iester M, Swindale NV, Mikelberg FS. Sector-based analysis of optic nerve head shape parameters and visual field indices in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma 1997; 6: 371-6.
9. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Swindale NV, Drance SM. ROC analysis of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph optic disc shape measure in glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol 1997; 32: 382-8.
10. Iester M, Capris P, Pandolfo A, et al. Learning effect, short term fluctuation and long-term fluctuation in frequency doubling technique. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 130: 160-4.
11. Iester M, Mardin CY, Budde WM, et al. Discriminant analysis formulas of optic nerve head parameters measured by confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma 2002; 11: 97-104.
12. Iester M, Traverso CE, De Feo F, et al. Correlation between frequency doubling technology and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. J Glaucoma 2005; 14: 368-74.
13. Johnson CA, Demirel S. The role of spatial and temporal factors in frequency-doubling perimetry. In: Wall M, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Up-date 1996/97. Amsterdam/New York: Kugler Publications, 1997; 13-9.
14. European Glaucoma Society 1998. Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma. Savona: Dogma, 1998; 64-5.
15. Caprioli J. The contour of the juxtapapillary nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1990; 97: 358-66.
16. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 413-25.
17. Iester M, Mermoud A, Schnyder C. Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 288-94.
18. Heijl A, Bengtsson B. The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114: 19-22.
19. Matsuo H, Tomita G, Suzuki Y, Araie M. Learning effect and measurement variability in frequency-doubling technology perimetry in chronic open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2002; 11: 467-73.
20. Horani A, Frenkel S, Yahalom C, et al. The learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using frequency doubling technology. J Glaucoma 2002; 11: 511-6.
21. Dreher AW, Tso PC, Weinreb RN. Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the normal and glaucomatous nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 111: 221-9.
22. Kruse FE, Burk ROW, Volcker HE, et al. Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the optic nerve head with laser tomographic scanning. Ophthalmology 1989; 96: 1320-4.
23. Cioffi GA, Robin AL, Eastman RD, et al. Confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope: reproducibility of optic nerve head topographic measurements with the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 1993; 100: 57-62.
24. Weinreb RN, Lusky M, Bartsch DU, Morsman D. Effect of repetitive imaging on topographic measurements of the optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 636-8.
25. Mikelberg FS, Wijsman K, Schulzer M. Reproducibility of topographic parameters obtained with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. J Glaucoma 1993; 2: 101-3.
26. Chauhan BC, LeBlanc RP, McCormick TA, Rogers JB. Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 1994; 118: 9-15.
27. Sample P, Weinreb RN. Progressive colour visual field loss in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33: 2068-71.
28. Birt CM, Shin DH, McCarty B, et al. Comparison between high-pass resolution perimetry and differential light sensitivity perimetry in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1998; 7: 111-6.
29. Funk J, Bornscheuer C, Grehn F. Neuroretinal rim area and visual field in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988; 226: 431-4.
30. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GOH. Optic disc morphometry in chronic primary open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988; 226: 531-8.
31. Brigatti L, Caprioli J. Correlation of visual field with scanning confocal laser optic disc measurements in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113: 1191-4.
32. Tole DM, Edwards MP, Davey KG, Menage MJ. The correlation of the visual field with scanning laser ophthalmoscope measurements in glaucoma. Eye 1998; 12: 686-90.
33. Iester M, Jonas JB, Mardin CY, Budde WM. Discriminant analysis models for early detection of glaucomatous optic disc changes. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 464-8.
34. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucoma visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137: 863-71.
35. Uchida H, Brigatti L, Caprioli J. Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37: 2393-401.