Apical dominance and apical control in multiple flushing of temperate woody species

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 74-83

  Cline, Morris G ^a   Harrington, Constance A ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HORMONES; NUTRITION; PLANTS (BOTANY);

APICAL CONTROL (AC); APICAL DOMINANCE (AD); CYTOKININ RATIO; DEVELOPMENTAL RESPONSE;

FORESTRY;

APICAL DOMINANCE; CANOPY ARCHITECTURE; GROWTH REGULATOR; HORMONE; TEMPERATE FOREST; WOODY PLANT;

FORESTRY; HORMONES; NUTRITION; PLANTS;

EID: 34250370144     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/X06-218     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Adams, W., and Bastien, J.-C. 1994. Genetics of second flushing in a French plantation of coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genet. 43: 345-352.
2. Allen, G., and Owens, J. 1972. The life history of Douglas-fir. Environment Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa, Ont.
3. Andersson-Gunneras, S., Mellerowicz, E., Love, J., Segerman, B., Ohmiya, Y., Coutinho, P., Nilsson, P., Henrissat, B., Moritz, T., and Sundberg, B. 2006. Biosynthesis of cellulose-enriched tension wood in Populus: global analysis of transcripts and metabolites identifies biochemical and developmental regulators in secondary wall biosynthesis. Plant J. 45: 144-165.
4. Barthélémy, D., and Caraglio, Y. 2007. Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Ann. Bot. (London), 99: 375-407.
5. Beveridge, C. 2000. Long-distance signaling and a mutational analysis of branching in pea. Plant Growth Regul. 32: 193-203.
6. Bollmark, M., Chen, H.-J., Morits, T., and Eliasson, L. 1995. Relations between cytokinin level, bud development and apical control in Norway spruce, Picea abies. Physiol. Plant. 95: 563-568.
7. Borchert, R. 1991. Growth and periodicity and dormancy. In Physiology of trees. Edited by A. Raghavendra. John Wiley & Sons, New York. pp. 221-245.
8. Bradshaw, H., Ceulemans, R., Davis, J., and Stettler, R. 2000. Emerging model systems in plant biology: poplar (Populus) as a model forest tree. J. Plant Growth Regul. 19: 306-313.
9. Brown, C., McAlpine, R., and Kormanik, P. 1967. Apical dominance and form in woody plants: a reappraisal. Am. J. Bot. 54: 153-162.
10. Campbell, R. 1965. Phenotypic variation and repeatability of stem sinuosity in Douglas-fir. Northwest Sci. 39: 47-59.
11. Cannell, M., Thompson, S., and Lines, R. 1976. An analysis of inherent differences in shoot growth within some north temperate conifers. In Tree physiology and yield improvement. Edited by M. Cannell and F. Last. Academic Press, New York. pp. 173-205.
12. Champagnat, P. 1989. Rest and activity in vegetative buds of trees. In Forest tree physiology. Edited by E. Dreyer et al. Ann. Sci. For. 46(Suppl.): 9s-26s.
13. Cline, M. 1996. Exogenous auxin effects on lateral bud outgrowth in decapitated shoots. Ann. Bot. (London), 78: 255-266.
14. Cline, M. 2000. Execution of the auxin replacement apical dominance experiment in temperate woody species. Am. J. Bot. 87: 182-190.
15. Cline, M., and Deppong, D. 1999. The role of apical dominance in paradormancy of temperate woody plants: a reappraisal. J. Plant Physiol. 155: 350-356.
16. Cline, M., and Dong-Il, K. 2002. A preliminary investigation of the role of auxin and cytokinin in sylleptic branching of three hybrid poplar clones exhibiting contrasting degrees of sylleptic branching. Ann. Bot. (London), 90: 417-421.
17. Cline, M., and Sadeski, K. 2002. Is auxin the repressor signal of branch growth in apical control? Am. J. Bot. 89: 1764-1771.
18. Cline, M., Yoders, M., Desai, D., Harrington, C., and Carlson, W. 2006. Hormonal control of second flushing in Douglas-fir shoots. Tree Physiol. 26: 1369-1375.
19. Coenen, C., and Lomax, T. 1997. Auxin-cytokinin interactions in higher plants: old problems and new tools. Trends Plant Sci. 2: 351-356.
20. Collin, P., Badot, P.-M., and Millet, B. 1994. Control de l'allongement rythmique des tiges par defoliation chez le frêne commun (Fraxinus excelsior L.). C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris Science Vie, 317: 1005-1011.
21. De Champs, J. 1971. Pousses d'aout du Douglas. Rapport annuel. Association Foret-Cellulose (AFOCEL), Paris. pp. 173-217.
22. Ewers, F., and Zimmerman, M. 1984. The hydraulic architecture of eastern hemlock, Tsuga canadensis. Can. J. Bot. 62: 940-946.
23. Graham, J., Hobbs, S., and Zaerr, J. 1994. The effect of flurprimidol on bud flush, shoot growth, and on endogenous gibberellins and abscisic acid of Douglas-fir seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 13: 131-136.
24. Halle, F., Oldeman, R., and Tomlinson, P. 1978. Tropical trees and forests. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
25. Hare, R. 1984a. EL-500: an effective growth retardant for dwarfing southern pine seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 14: 123-127.
26. Hare, R. 1984b. Stimulation of early height growth in longleaf pine with growth regulators. Can. J. For. Res. 14: 450-462.
27. Harmer, R. 1992a. Relationships between shoot length, bud number and branch production in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. For. 65: 61-72.
28. Harmer, R. 1992b. The incidence of recurrent flushing and its effect on branch production in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. growing in southern England. Ann. Sci. For. 49: 589-597.
29. Harmer, R., and Baker, C. 1995. An evaluation of decapitation as a method for selecting clonal Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. with different branching intensities. Ann. Sci. For. 52: 89-102.
30. Harrington, C. 1991. Retrospective shoot growth analysis for three sources of loblolly pine. Can J. For. Res. 21: 306-317.
31. Herschback, C., and Kopriva, S. 2002. Transgenic trees as tools in tree and plant physiology. Trees, 16: 250-261.
32. Jablanczy, A. 1971. Changes due to age in apical development in spruce and fir. Can. For. Serv. Bi-Mon. Res. Notes 27: 10.
33. Jankiewicz, L., and Stecki, Z. 1976. Some mechanisms responsible for differences in tree form In Tree physiology and yield improvement. Edited by M. Cannell and F. Last. Academic Press, New York. pp. 157-172.
34. Klee, H., and Romano, C. 1994. The roles of phytohormones in development as studied in transgenic plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 13: 311-324.
35. Kozlowski, T., Torrie, J., and Marshall, P. 1973. Predictability of shoot length from bud size in Pinus resinosa Ait. Can. J. For. Res. 3: 34-38.
36. Kowzlowski, T., Kramer, P., and Pallardy, S. 1991. The physiological ecology of woody plants. Academic Press, New York.
37. Kramer, P., and Kozlowski, T. 1979. Physiology of woody plants. Academic Press, New York.
38. Lang, G., Early, J., Martin, G., and Darnell, R. 1987. Endo-, para-, and ecodormancy: physiological terminology and classification for dormancy research. Hortic. Sci. 22: 371-377.
39. Lanner, R. 1972. Growth and morphogenesis of pines in the tropics. In Selection and breeding to improve some tropical conifers. Vol. 1. Edited by J. Burley and D. Nikles. Commonwealth Forestry Institute, Oxford, and Department of Forestry, Queensland, Australia. pp. 126-132.
40. Lanner, R. 1976. Patterns of shoot development in Pinus and their relationship to growth potential. In Tree physiology and yield improvement. Edited by M. Cannell and F. Last. Academic Press, New York. pp. 223-243.
41. Lanner, R., and Van Den Berg, D. 1973. The vegetative buds and shoots of lodgepole pine. In Management of lodgepole pine ecosystems. Vol. 1. Edited by D. Baumgartner. Washington State University, Pullman, Wash. pp. 68-85.
42. Lavender, D., and Zaerr, J. 1967. The role of growth regulatory substances in the physiology of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Mirb. Franco) seedlings. Proc. Int. Plant Propagation Soc. 17: 146-156.
43. Leaky, S., and Longman, K. 1986. Physiological, environmental and genetic variation in apical dominance as determined by decapitation in Triplochiton scleroxylon. Tree Physiol. 1: 193-207.
44. Leyser, O. 2003. Regulation of shoot branching by auxin. Trends Plant Sci. 8: 541-546.
45. Little, C. 1970. Apical dominance in long shoots of white pine (Pinus strobus). Can. J. Bot. 48: 239-253.
46. Little, C. 1985. Increasing lateral shoot production in balsam fir Christmas trees with cytokinin application. Hortic. Sci. 20: 713-714.
47. Livingston, N., Whitehead, D., Kelliher, R. Grace, Y., Walcroft, A.. Byers, J., McSeveny. T., and Millard, P. 1998. Nitrogen allocation and carbon isotope fractionation in relation to intercepted radiation and position in a young Pinus radiata D. Don tree. Plant Cell Environ. 21: 795-803.
48. Mazzola, M., and Costante, J. 1987. Efficacy of BA for the promotion of lateral bud formation on Douglas-fir and Colorado blue spruce. Hortic. Sci. 22: 234-235.
49. McCabe, R., and Labisky, R. 1959. Leader forking of red and white pines in plantations. J. For. 57: 94-97.
50. Mclntyre, C., and Hsiao, A. 1990. The role of expanded leaves in the correlative inhibition of axillary buds in milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Can. J. Bot. 68: 1280-1285.
51. Merkle, S., and Dean, J. 2000. Forest tree biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 11: 298-302.
52. 14C-assimilates in roses. II. The effect of shoot darkening and cytokinin application. Physiol. Plant. 52: 197-200.
53. O'Reilly, C., and Owens, J. 1989. Polycyclic growth and branching in provenances of lodgepole pine. Can J. For. Res. 19: 79-87.
54. Owens, J., and Molder, M. 1973. A study of DNA and mitotic activity in the vegetative apex of Douglas-fir during the annual growth cycle. Can. J. Bot. 51: 1395-1409.
55. Owens, J., and Simpson, S. 1988. Bud and shoot development in Picea engelmannii in response to cone induction treatments. Can. J. For. Res. 18: 231-241.
56. 4/7 and root-pruning on the reproductive and vegetative processes in Douglas-fir. III. Effects on anatomy of shoot elongation and terminal bud development. Can J. For. Res. 15: 354-364.
57. Pillay, L., and Railton, L. 1983. Complete release of axillary buds from apical dominance in intact, light-grown seedlings of Pisum sativum L., following a single application of cytokinin. Plant Physiol. 71: 972-979.
58. Powell, G. 1987. Syllepsis in Larix laricina: analysis of tree leaders with and without sylleptic long shoots. Can. J. For. Res. 17: 490-498.
59. Rasmussen, H., Soerensen, S., and Andersen, L. 2003. Bud set in Abies nordmanniana Spach. influenced by bud and branch manipulations. Trees, 17: 510-514.
60. Romberger, J. 1963. Meristems, growth and development in woody plants. USDA Tech. Bull. No. 1293.
61. Roth, B., and Newton, M. 1996. Role of lammas growth in recovery of Douglas-fir seedlings by weed control, fertilization, and seed source. Can. J. For. Res. 26: 936-944.
62. Rudolph, T. 1964. Lammas growth and prolepsis in jack pine in the Lake States. For. Sci. Monogr. 6: 1-70.
63. Schermann, N., Adams, W., Aitken, S., and Bastein, J.-C. 1997. Genetic parameters of stem for traits in a 9-year-old coastal Douglas-fir progeny test in Washington. Silvae Genet. 46: 166-170.
64. Schmitz, G., and Theres, K. 2005. Shoot and inflorescence branching. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8: 506-511.
65. Sellin, A. 1988. Hydraulic architecture in the Norway spruce. Fiziol. Rast. (Moscow), 35: 1099-1107.
66. Souza, M., Puntieri, J., Barthemlemy, D., and Brion, C. 2000. Bud content and its relation to shoot size and structure in Nothofagus pumilio (Poepp. et Endl.) Krasser (Nothogfagaceae). Ann. Bot. (London). 85: 547-555.
67. Srivastava, L. 2001. Plant growth and development. Academic Press, New York.
68. Stafstrom, J. 1993. Axillary bud development in pea: apical dominance, growth cycles, hormonal regulation and plant architecture. In Cell communication in plants. Edited by R. Aminasino. Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York. pp. 75-86.
69. Sterck, F. 2005. Woody tree architecture. Annu. Plant Rev. 17: 209-237.
70. Suzuki, T. 1990. Apical control of lateral bud development and shoot growth in mulberry (Morus alba). Physiol. Plant. 80: 350-356.
71. Taiz, L., and Zeiger, E. 2002. Plant physiology. 3rd ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Mass.
72. Temel, F., and Adams, W. 2000. Persistence and age-age genetic correlations of stem defects in coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco). For. Genet. 7: 145-153.
73. Thimann, K., and Skoog, F. 1933. Studies on the growth hormones of plants. III. The inhibition action of growth substance on bud development. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 19: 714-716.
74. Timell, T. 1986. Compression wood in gymnosperms. II. Springer-Verlag, New York.
75. Trewavas, A. 1987. Growth substance sensitivity: the limiting factor in plant development. Physiol. Plant. 55: 60-72.
76. Vargas-Hernandez, J., Adams, W., and Joyce, D. 2003. Quantitative genetic structure of stem form and branching traits in Douglas-fir seedlings and implications for early selection. Silvae Genet. 52: 36-44.
77. Wareing, P. 1970. Growth and its coordination in trees. In Physiology of tree crops. Edited by L. Luckwill and C. Cuttings. Academic Press, New York. pp. 1-21.
78. Whitehill, S., and Schwabe, W. 1975. Vegetative propagation of Pinus sylvestris. Physiol. Plant. 35: 66-71.
79. Wilson, B. 1990. The development of tree form. Hortic. Sci. 25: 52-54.
80. Wilson, B. 2000. Apical control of branch growth and angle in woody plants. Am. J. Bot. 87: 601-607.
81. Wilson, B., and Gartner, B. 2002. Effects of stem girdling on conifers: apical control of branches, growth and air in wood. Tree Physiol. 22: 347-353.
82. Zimmerman, M., and Brown, C. 1971. Trees: structure and function. Springer-Verlag, New York.