Improving teacher quality: Lessons from America's No Child Left behind

Cambridge Journal of Education

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 191-206

  Smith, Emma ^a   Gorard, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250356305     PISSN: 0305764X     EISSN: 14693577     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03057640701372426     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Archer, J. (2002) Research: focusing in on teachers, Education Week, 21(29), 36-39.
2. Berliner, D. C. (2005) The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality, Journal of Teacher Education, 56(3), 205-213.
3. Blank, R. K., Langesen, D., Laird, E., Toye, C. & de Mello, V. B. (2004) Meeting NCLB goals for highly qualified teachers: estimates by state from survey data, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(70), 1-23.
4. California Department of Education (2003) California's consolidated state application, September 1, 2003, Submission. Available online at: www.cde.ca.gov/nclb/sr/sa/documents/ yr04csa0901.pdf (accessed July 2005).
5. California Department of Education (2004) NCLB teacher requirements: a resource guide. Available online at: www.cde.ca.gov/nclb/sr/tq/documents/ nclbresourceguide.pdf (accessed July 2005).
6. California Department of Education (2005a) California's consolidated state performance report: part 1. Available online at: www.cde.ca.gov/nclb/sr/ rt/documents/usdecsprjanfinal.doc (accessed July 2005).
7. California Department of Education (2005b) California basic education data system. Available online at: www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/cb/ (accessed June 2005).
8. Carroll, S. J., Krop, C., Arkes, J., Morrison, P. A. & Flanagan, A. (2005) California's K-12 public schools: how are they doing? Available online at: www.rand.org (accessed June 2005).
9. Centre on Education Policy (2005) From the capital to the classroom: year 3 of the No Child Left Behind Act (Washington, DC, Centre of Education Policy). Available online at: www.ctredpol.org/pubs/nclby3/press/cep- nclby3_21Mar2005.pdf (accessed May 2007).
10. Chiu, M. M. & Khoo, L. (2005) Effects of resources, inequality and privilege bias on achievement: country, school and student level analyses, American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 575-603.
11. Cochran-Smith, M. (2005) NCLB: three years and counting, Journal of Teacher Education, 56(2), 99-103.
12. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000) Teacher Quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Available online at: http://epaa.asu.edu/ epaa/v8nl (accessed June 2005).
13. Darling-Hammond, L. & Younge, P. (2002) Defining 'highly-qualified' teachers: what does 'scientifically-based' research actually tell us?, Educational Researcher, December, 13-25.
14. Davis, M. R. (2005) Utah teachers OK'd as 'highly qualified', Education Week, 24(25), p. 17.
15. Dayton, M. (2005) The future of the No Child Left Behind Act, speech given at the Cato Institute Policy Forum, 31 May 2005. Available online at: www.cato.org/events/050531pf.html (accessed July 2005).
16. Education Commission of the States (2004a) ECS report to the nation, Chapter 7 and Appendix B. Available online at: www.ecs.org/html/Special/NCLB/ ReportToTheNation/docs/ Indicator_7.pdf (accessed June 2005).
17. Education Commission of the States (2004b) 50-State HOUSSE and HOUSSE status report (all levels). Available online at: http://mb2.ecs.org/reports/ Report.aspx?id=140 (accessed June 2005).
18. Education Commission of the States (2004c) No Child Left Behind; projects and centers state status. Available online at: http://nclb2.ecs.org/ NCLBSURVEY/NCLB.aspx?Target=SS#ln82 (accessed July 2005).
19. Education Trust (2002) The funding gap: low-income and minority students receive fewer dollars. Available online at: www2.edtrust.org/ EdTrust/Product+Catalog/special+reports.htm#2003 (accessed May 2004).
20. Education Trust (2003) Telling the whole truth (or not) about highly qualified teachers, New State Data, December. Available online at: http://www2.edtrust.org (accessed June 2005).
21. Education Week (2005, January 6) Quality counts: the Wisconsin report card, p. 137.
22. Finn, C. E. (2003) Teacher reform gone astray, in our schools and our future... are we still at risk? (California, Hoover Institution Press).
23. Futernick, K. (2003) California and the Federal No Child Left Behind Act, Education Commission for the States. Available online at: www.edfordemocracy.org/TQI/index.htm (accessed June 2005).
24. Gorard, S., See, B. H., Smith, E. & White, P. (2006) Strengthening the teaching workforce: issues in teacher supply, training, and retention (London, Continuum).
25. Hanushek, E. A. (2002) Teacher quality, in: L. T. Izumi & W. M. Evers (Eds) Teacher quality, Hoover Institution Press Publication No. 505.
26. Hanushek, E. A. & Rivkin, S. G. (2004) How to improve the supply of high-quality teachers, in: D. Ravitch (Ed.) Brookings papers on education (Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press).
27. Hoxby, C. M. (2003) What has changed and what has not?, in: P. Peterson (Ed.) Our schools and our future ...are we still at risk? (California, Hoover Institution Press).
28. Jacobsen, L. (2005a, January 12) Reciprocal licence bestowed on new teachers, Education Week, p. 5.
29. Jacobsen, L. (2005b, January 5) States criticized on standards for veteran teachers, Education Week, p. 11.
30. Jepsen, G. & Rivkin, S. (2002) Class size reduction, teacher quality and academic achievement in California public elementary schools (San Francisco, The Public Policy Institute of California).
31. Kane, T. J. & Staiger, D. O. (2003) Unintended consequences of racial subgroup rules, in: P. Peterson & M. West (Eds) No child left behind? The politics and practice of school accountability (Washington, DC, The Brookings Institution).
32. Kaplan, L. S. & Owings, W. A. (2003) NCLB: The politics of teacher quality, Phi Delta Kappan, May, 687-692.
33. Keller, B. (2003) States claim teachers are 'qualified', Education Week, 23(9), 1-16.
34. Keller, B. (2004, November 3) NCLB presents middle school complications, Education Week, pp. 1-18.
35. Keller, B. (2005) Utah dispute Federal findings on teacher quality, Education Week, 24(18), 5.
36. Koret Task Force on K-12 Education (2003) '... are we still at risk?', Findings and recommendations, in: P. Peterson (Ed.) Our schools and our future ...are we still at risk? (California, Hoover Institution Press).
37. Manzo, K. K. (2005, September 1) Study finds teachers are losing ground on salary front, Education Week, p. 12.
38. McDermott, K. A. & Jensen, L. S. (2005) Dubious sovereignty: Federal conditions of aid and the NCLB Act, Peabody Journal of Education, 80(2), 39-56.
39. National Centre for Educational Statistics (2005) The nation's report card: state profiles. Available online at: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/ states (accessed July 2005).
40. National Commission on Excellence in Education (NCEE) (1983) A nation at risk (Washington, DC, US Printing Office). Available online at: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/risk.html (accessed May 2007).
41. Nevada Department of Education (2005) Teacher licensing requirements. Available online at: www.doe.nv.gov/teachers/license4teachers.html (accessed July 2005).
42. Newman, J. W. (2002) America's teachers: an introduction to education (Boston, Allyn & Bacon).
43. Olson, L. (2005, November 4) Analysts worry NCLB won't solve teacher issues, Education Week p. 25.
44. Peterson, P. (Ed.) (2003) Our schools and our future... are we still at risk? Findings of the Koret Task Force on K-12 Education (California, Hoover Institution Press).
45. Quality Counts (2003) Quality counts: California, Education Week, 22(17), 144-115.
46. Ravitch, D. (2003) A historic document, in: P. Peterson (Ed.) Our schools and our future ... are we still at risk? (California, Hoover Institution Press).
47. Rivers, J. C. & Sanders, W. L. (2002) Teacher quality and equity in educational opportunity: findings and policy implications, in: L. T. Izumi & W. M. Evers (Eds) Teacher quality, Hoover Institution Press Publication No. 505.
48. Roper, T. (2002) Who is teaching secondary mathematics?, in: J. Donnelly (Ed.) The supply of school mathematics and science teachers: undergraduate attitudes and mathematics teacher deployment (Leeds, Centre for studies in Science and Mathematics Education).
49. Slack, J. L. (2005, January 12) New report details not-so-golden state of California Education, Education Week, 1-23.
50. Smith, E. (2005) Raising standards in American schools: the case of No child left behind, Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 507-524.
51. Smithers, R. (2001, August 30) Foreign recruits hit record numbers, Times Educational Supplement, p. 4.
52. University of Madison-Wisconsin (2005) School of Education: teacher certification programme requirements. Available online at: www.wisc.edu/pubs/ug/ 06education/cert.html (accessed July 2005).
53. US Department of Education (2002a) No Child Left Behind: executive summary. Available online at: www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/presidentplan/ page_pg3.html (accessed June 2004).
54. US Department of Education (2002b) Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: the Secretary's annual report on teacher qualify (Washington, DC, US Department of Education).
55. US Department of Education (2003) Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: the Secretary's third annual report on teacher quality (Washington, DC, US Department of Education).
56. US Department of Education (2004) Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: the Secretary's second annual report on teacher quality (Washington, DC, US Department of Education).
57. US Department of Education (2005a) Title II technical assistance. Available online at: www.title2.org/index.htm (accessed July 2005).
58. US Department of Education (2005b) New No Child Left Behind flexibility: highly qualified teachers. Available online at: www.ed.gov/nclb/methods/teachers/hqtflexibility.html (accessed June 2005).
59. Walsh, K. (2001) Teacher certification reconsidered: stumbling for quality (Maryland, The Abell Foundation). Available online at: www.educationnext.org/unabridged/20021/walsh.pdf (accessed June 2005).
60. Walsh, K. & Snyder, E. (2004) Searching the attic: how states are responding to the nation's goal of placing an highly qualified teacher in every classroom (The National Council on Teacher Quality). Available online at: http//www.nctq.org/nctq/publications (accessed May 2007).
61. Wisconsin Department of Education (2005a) Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. Available online at: www.dpi.state.wi.us (accessed June 2005).
62. Wisconsin Department of Education (2005b) Public School data: school and staff salary data. Available online at: www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/dltcl/lbstat/ newasr.html (accessed June 2005).