Decision and debate: Addressing the implications of the POVA banning list

The Journal of Adult Protection

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 3-14

  Manthorpe, Jill ^a   Stevens, Martin ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Abuse; Adult protection; Ban; Disciplinary process; Human resources; Social care workforce; Vetting system

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250345077     PISSN: 14668203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14668203200600009     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Action on Elder Abuse (2006) Adult Protection Data Collection and Reporting Requirements. London: Action on Elder Abuse.
2. Audit Commission (2006) The Future of Regulation in the Public Sector. London: Audit Commission.
3. Bonnie RJ & Wallace RB (Eds) (2003) Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, neglect, and exploitation in an aging America. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
4. Conlin-Shaw M (1999) Nursing home resident abuse by staff: exploring the dynamics. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect 9 (4) 1-25.
5. Department for Education and Skills (2006) Review of the List 99 Decision Making Process and Policy Implications. London: Department for Education and Skills. Avalable at: http://www.everychildmatters.gov.uk/_files/F75F72B142DD97AF551A3CEE7A0E7039.doc (accessed 12.5.06).
6. Department of Health (2006) Making Safeguarding Everybody's Business: A post-Bichard vetting scheme, an analysis of the responses to the consultation document. London: Department of Health.
7. Donohue B & Strawbridge H (2006) Explaining about and managing disciplinary situations. Working with Older People 10 (1) 9-12.
8. Fyson R, Kitson D & Corbett A (2004) Learning disability, abuse and inquiry. In: Stanley N and Manthorpe J (Eds) The Age of Inquiry: Learning and blaming in health and social care. London: Routledge.
9. Hawes C (2003) Elder abuse in residential long-term care settings: what is known and what information is needed? In: Bonnie P & Wallace R (Eds) Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, neglect and exploitation in an aging America (446-93). Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
10. Her Majesty's Government (2004) The Bichard Inquiry Report. London: The Stationery Office.
11. Hughes B & Paterson K (1997) The social model of disability and the disappearing body: towards a sociology of impairment. Disability and Society 12 (3) 325-340.
12. Layder D (1998) The reality of social domains: implications for theory and method. In: May T & Williams M (Eds) Knowing the Social World. Buckingham: Open University Press.
13. Moniz-Cook E, Millington D & Silver M (1997) Residential care for older people: job satisfaction and psychological health in care staff. Health and Social Care in the Community 5 (2) 124-133.
14. National Patient Safety Agency (2005) Building a Memory: Preventing harm, reducing risks and improving patient safety. London: National Patient Safety Agency.
15. Pillemer K (1998) Maltreatment of patients in nursing homes: overview and research agenda. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 29 227-38.
16. Richardson B, Kitchen G & Livingstone G (2002) The effect of education on knowledge and management of elder abuse: a randomized controlled trial. Age and Ageing 31 335-341.
17. Secretary of State for the Home Department (2006) Bichard Inquiry, House of Commons Hansard Written Ministerial Statements Index for 19 Jan 2006, Columns 34SW-35SW.
18. Stevens M & Manthorpe J (2005) The First 100 Referrals to the POVA List. London: King's College London, Social Care Workforce Research Unit.