Specificity of the Adultrap for capturing females of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae);Especificidade da armadilha Adultrap para capturar fêmeas de Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)

Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 216-219

  Gomes, Almério De Castro ^a   Da Silva, Nilza Nunes ^a   Bernal, Regina Tomie Ivata ^a   Leandro, André De Souza ^c   De Camargo, Natal Jataí ^b   Da Silva, Allan Martins ^b   Ferreira, Adão Celestino ^c   Ogura, Luis Carlos ^c   De Oliveira, Sebastião José ^c   De Moura, Silvestre Marques ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b Secretaria de Estado da Saude do Parana   (Brazil)

^c Centro de Controle de Zoonoses   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Adultrap; Aedes aegypti; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

ADULTRAP; AEDES AEGYPTI; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICE; FEMALE; FLY; HOME; LOGLINEAR MODEL; MALE; MOSQUITO; NONHUMAN; SPECIES; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

AEDES AEGYPTI; CULICIDAE; DIPTERA;

EID: 34250343725     PISSN: 00378682     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0037-86822007000200014     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Barata EAM, Costa AIP, Chiaravalloti-Neto F, Glasser CM, Barata JMS, Natal D. População de Aedes aegypti (I.) em área endêmica de dengue. Sudeste do Brasil. Revista de Saúde Pública 35:237-242, 2001.
2. Christophers SR. The development of egg folllicle in Anophelines. Paludism 2:73-89, 1911.
3. Clark GG, Seda H, Gubler DJ. Use of the "CDCbackback aspirator" for surveillance of Aedes aegypti in San Juan, Porto Rico. Journal American Mosquito Control Association 10:119-124, 1994.
4. Dennett JA, Vessey NY, Parsons RE. A comparison of seven traps used for collection of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti originating from a large ire repository in Harris County (Houston), Texas. Journal American Mosquito Control Association 20:342-349, 2004.
5. Gomes AC. Medidas dos níveis de infestação urbana para Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti e Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus em programa de vigilância entomológica. Informe Epidemiológico do SUS 7: 49-57, 1998.
6. Gomes AC, Souza JMP, Bergamaschi DP, Andrade VR, Leite OF, Rangel O, Souza SSL, Guimarães NSN, Lima VLC. Atividade antropofílica de Aedes aegypti e Aedes albopictus em área sob controle e vigilância. Revista de Saúde Pública 39:206-210, 2005.
7. Kish L. longipalpis Survey sampling, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1965.
8. a edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2004.
9. McCardle PW, Webb RE, Norden BB, Aldrich JR. Evaluation of five trapping systems for the surveillance of gravid mosquitoes in Prince Georges County, Maryland. Journal American Mosquito Control Association 20:254-260, 2004.
10. Morato VCG, Teixeira MG, Gomes AC, Bergamaschi DP, Barreto ML. Infestation of Aedes aegypti estimated by oviposition traps in Brazil. Revista de Saúde Pública 39: 553-558, 2005.
11. Reiter P, Amador MA, Colon N. Enhancement of the CDC ovitrap with hay infusions for daily monitoring of Aedes aegypti populations. Journal American Mosquito Control Association 7:52-55, 1991.
12. Schoeler GB, Schileich SS, Manweiler AS, Lopez-Sifuentes,V. Evaluation of surveillance devices for monitoring Aedes aegypti in an urban area of northeastern Peru. Journal American Mosquito Control Association 20:6-11, 2004.
13. Trexler JD, Apperson CS, Gemeno C, Perich MJ, Carlson D, Schal C. Field and laboratory evaluation of potential oviposition attractans for Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal American Mosquito Control Association 19: 228-234, 2003.