Clinical evaluation of the CA530-VET hematology analyzer for use in veterinary practice

Veterinary Clinical Pathology

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 155-166

  Roleff, Sabine ^a   Arndt, Gisela ^a   Bottema, Bram ^b   Junker, Lothar ^c,d   Grabner, Arthur ^a   Kohn, Barbara ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b Boule Medical AB   (Sweden)

^c Menarini Diagnostics   (Germany)

^d Instrumentation Laboratory   (Germany)

Author keywords

CA530 VET; Cat; Dog; Hematology analyzer; Horse; Method comparison

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BLOOD; BLOOD EXAMINATION; CAT; DOG; EVALUATION; HORSE; INSTRUMENTATION; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; QUALITY CONTROL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THROMBOCYTE COUNT; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

ANIMALS; CATS; DOGS; HEMATOLOGIC TESTS; HEMOGLOBINS; HORSES; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; PLATELET COUNT; QUALITY CONTROL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

CANIS FAMILIARIS; EQUIDAE; FELIDAE;

EID: 34250336930     PISSN: 02756382     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2007.tb00202.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Broughton PM, Buttolph MA, Gowenlock AH, Neill DW, Skentelbery RG. Recommended scheme for the evaluation of instruments for automatic analysis in the clinical biochemistry laboratory. J Clin Pathol. 1969;22:278-284.
2. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
3. Broughton PM, Gowenlock AH, McCormack JJ, Neill DW. A revised scheme for the evaluation of automatic instruments for use in clinical chemistry. Ann Clin Biochem. 1974;11:207-218.
4. Moritz A. Der Einsatz Lasergestützter Multiparameter- Hämatologyiesysteme in der Veterinärmedizin [The Use of Laser Supported Multiparameter Hematology Systems in Veterinary Medicine]. Wetzlar, Germany: Büchse der Pandorra Verlags-GmbH; 2002:124-210.
5. Bundesärztekammer [Federal Medical Council]. Richtlinie der Bundesärztekammer zur Qualitätssicherung quantitativer laboratoriumsmedizinischer Untersuchungen [Guideline of the Federal Medical Council for quality assurance for quantitative laboratory medical examinations]. Dt. Artzebl. 2001;98:A2747-2759.
6. Klee GG. Performance goals for internal quality control of multichannel haematology analysers. Clin Lab Haematol. 1990;12:65-74.
7. Neuerer F, Hirschberger J. Evaluation des Hämatologiegerätes Vet ABC/8P bei Hund, Katze und Pferd [Evaluation of the haematology-system Vet ABC in dogs, cats and horses]. Prakt Tierarzt. 1999;80: 584-594.
8. Sprangfors P, Kineberger B, Holmen A. Nytt Analyssystem för Veterinärmedicinsk Hematologi [A new analyzing system for veterinary hematology]. Sve Vet Tid. 1990;42:527-531.
9. Lavin SF, Mora J, Monreal L, Vinas L. Evaluation of a haematological analyser for its use in canine clinical pathology. J Vet Med. A 1991;A38:702-709.
10. Pastor J, Cuenca R, Velarde R, Vinas L, Lavin S. Evaluation of a hematology analyser with canine and feline blood. Vet Clin Pathol. 1997;26:138-147.
11. Ziegler A. Die automatisierte Blutzelldifferenzierung mit den Hämatologiesystemen Microx 70 und Technicon H*1 beim Hund [The automatic white blood cell differentiation with the hematology systems Microx 70 and Technicon H*1 for the dog] [dissertation]. Justus-Liebig- Universität, Gießen: Germany; 1997.
12. Suchfort C. Die automatisierte Blutzellzählung und -differenzierung mit dem Technicon H*1 bei der Katze unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Thrombozyten und der Erythrozytenmorphologie bei Anämien [The automatic blood cell count and differentiation with the Technicon H*1 in cats with special consideration of the platelet and erythrocyte morpholgy in anemic patients][dissertation]. Justus-Liebig-Universität: Gießen, Germany; 1998.
13. Seegers A. Einsatzfähigkeit des Technicon H*1 in der hämatologischen Diagnostik beim Pferd [Performance evaluation of the Technicon H*1 for hematological diagnostics in horses] [dissertation]. Justus-Liebig-Universität: Gießen, Germany; 1997.
14. Rümke CL. Die Zelldifferenzierung in Blutausstrichen: Variabilität der Ergebnisse [Differentiating cells using blood smears: variability of the results]. Triangel. 1960;4:154-158.
15. Goossens W, Van-Hove L, Verwilghen RL. Monocyte counting: discrepancies in results obtained with different automated instruments. J Clin Pathol. 1991;44:224-227.
16. Koepke M. A delineation of performance criteria for the differentiation of leukocytes. Am J Clin Pathol. 1977;68:202-206.
17. Liedl R, Hirschberger J. Automatische Zellzählung und Zelldifferenzierung mit dem Technicon H*1 bei Blutproben der Katze [Validation of the Technicon H*1 for the automated cell count and cell differentiation of feline blood samples]. Kleintierpraxis. 1997;42: 683-774.
18. Weiser MG. Modification and evaluation of a multichannel blood cell counting system for blood analysis in veterinary hematology. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1987;190:411-415.
19. Pastor J, Cuenca R, Velarde R, Marco I, Vinas L, Lavin S. Evaluation of a haematological analyser (Sysmex F-800) with equine blood. J Vet Med. A 1997;A45:119-126.
20. Mischke R, Deniz A, Weiss J. Untersuchung zur automatischen Zellzählung von Katzenblut [Investigation on the automatic cell counting in feline blood]. Dtsch Tierärztl Wschr. 1995;102:435-440.
21. Bienzle D, Stanton JB, Embry JM, Bush SE, Mahaffey E. Evaluation of an in-house centrifugal hematology analyser for use in veterinary practice. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2000;217:1195-1200.
22. Dewhurst EC, Crawford E, Cue S, Dodkin S, German A, Papasouliotis K. Analysis of canine and feline heamograms using the VetScan HMT analyser. J Small Anim Pract. 2003;44:443-448.
23. Boule-Medical. User Manual V3.7 CA620/530-VET. Stockholm, Sweden: Boule-Medical AB; 2003.
24. Moritz A, Hoffmann C. Thrombozytenzählung bei der Katze [Platelet count in the cat]. Tierärztl Prax. 1997;25:695-700.
25. Norman EJ, Barron RCJ, Nash AS, Clampitt RB. Prevalence of low automated platelet counts in cats: comparison with prevalence of thrombocytopenia based on blood smear estimation. Vet Clin Pathol. 2001;30:137-140.