Evaluation of healthcare IT applications: The user acceptance perspective

Studies in Computational Intelligence

Volumn 65, Issue , 2007, Pages 49-78

  Zheng, Kai ^a   Padman, Rema ^b   Johnson, Michael P ^b   Diamond, Herbert S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250322314     PISSN: 1860949X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72375-2_4     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. D. ADAMS, R. NELSON, AND P. TODD, Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication, MIS Quarterly, 16 (1992), pp. 227-247
2. R. AGARWAL AND E. KARAHANNA, Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage, MIS Quarterly, 24 (2000), pp. 665-694
3. R. AGARWAL AND J. PRASAD, The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptation of information technologies, Decision Sci, 28 (1997), pp. 557-582
4. R. AGARWAL AND J. PRASAD Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?, Decision Sci, 30 (1999), pp. 361-391
5. I. AJZEN, From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior, in Springer series in social psychology, J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann, eds., Springer, Berlin, 1985, pp. 11-39
6. I. AJZEN, The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (1991), pp. 179-211
7. I. AJZEN AND M. FISHBEIN, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980
8. D. ALBARRACIN, B. T. JOHNSON, M. FISHBEIN, AND P. A. MUELLERLEILE, Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis, Psychol Bull, 127 (2001), pp. 142-161
9. J. ANDERSON, S. JAY, H. SCHWEER, M. ANDERSON, AND D. KASSING, Physician communication networks and the adoption and utilization of computer applications in medicine, in Use and Impact of Computers in Clinical Medicine, J. G. Anderson and S. J. Jay, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987, pp. 185-199
10. J. G. ANDERSON, C. E. AYDIN, AND S. J. JAY, Evaluating Health Care Information Systems, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994
11. C. J. ARMITAGE AND M. CONNER, Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review, Br J Soc Psychol, 40 (2001), pp. 471-499
12. C. E. AYDIN, Occupational adaptation to computerized medical information systems, J Health Soc Behav, 30 (1989), pp. 163-179
13. A. BANDURA, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1986
14. A. BANDURA, Social cognitive theory, in Annals of Child Development Vol. 6, R. Vasta, ed., Jai Press Ltd, Greenwich, CT, 1989, pp. 1-60
15. H. BARKI AND J. HARTWICK, Measuring user participation, use involvement, and user attitude, MIS Quarterly, 18 (1994), pp. 59-82
16. L. BECK AND I. AJZEN, Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior, J of Research and Personality, 25 (1991), pp. 285-301
17. E. BLAIR AND S. BURTON, Cognitive process used by survey respondents to answer to behavioral frequency questions, J of Consumer Research, 14 (1987), pp. 280-288
18. N. M. BRADBURN, J. HUTTENLOCHER, AND L. HEDGES, Telescoping and temporal memory, in Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports, N. Schwarz and S. Sudman, eds., Springer Verlag, New York, 1994, pp. 203-216
19. N. M. BRADBURN, L. J. RIPS, AND S. K. SHEVELL, Answering autobiographical questions: The impact of memory and inference on surveys, Science, 236 (1987), pp. 157-161
20. R. S. BURT, Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence, The American Journal of Sociology, 92 (1987), pp. 1287-1335
21. P. CHANG, Y. S. HSU, Y. M. TZENG, Y. Y. SANG, I. C. HOU, AND W. F. KAO, The development of intelligent, triage-based, mass-gathering emergency medical service PDA support systems, J Nurs Res, 12 (2004), pp. 227-236
22. P. Y. K. CHAU AND P. J. H. HU, Information technology acceptance by professionals: A model comparison approach, Decision Sciences, 32 (2001), pp. 699-719
23. P. Y. K. CHAU AND P. J. H. HU, Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study J of Management Information Systems, 18 (2002), pp. 191-229
24. P. Y. K. CHAU AND P. J. H. HU, Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions on telemedicine technology acceptance: An empirical test of competing theories, Information and Management, 39 (2002), pp. 297-311
25. C. CHEN, M. CZERWINSKI, AND R. MACREDIE, Individual differences in virtual environments - introduction and overview, J of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (2000), pp. 499-507
26. W. W. CHIN, The measurement and meaning of IT usage: reconciling recent discrepancies between self reported and computer recorded usage, in Proceedings of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, Information Systems Division, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1996, pp. 65-74
27. W. G. CHISMAR AND S. WILEY-PATTON, Test of the technology acceptance model for the internet in pediatrics, Proc AMIA Symp, (2002), pp. 155-159
28. W. G. CHISMAR AND S. WILEY-PATTON, Does the extended technology acceptance model apply to physicians, in HICSS '03: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-36), Washington, DC, USA, 2003, IEEE Computer Society, p. 160
29. K. E. CLARKE AND A. AISH, An exploration of health beliefs and attitudes of smokers with vascular disease who participate in or decline a smoking cessation program, J Vasc Nurs, 20 (2002), pp. 96-105
30. J. COLEMAN, E. KATZ, AND H. MENZEL, Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study, Bobbs-Merrill, New York: NY, 1966. 2nd
31. R. B. COOPER AND R. W. ZMUD, Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach, Manage. Sci., 36 (1990), pp. 123-139
32. F. D. DAVIS, A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results, PhD thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986
33. F. D. DAVIS, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13 (1989), pp. 319-342
34. F. D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts, Int J Human-Computer Studies, 38 (1993), pp. 475-487
35. F. D. DAVIS, R. P. BAGOZZI, AND P. R. WARSHAW, User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Sci, 35 (1989), pp. 982-1003
36. T. J. DEMAIO, Social desirability and survey measurement: A review, in Surveying subjective phenomena, C. F. Turner and E. Martin, eds., Russell Sage, New York, 1984, pp. 257-281
37. D. R. DIXON AND M. STEWART, Exploring information technology adoption by family physicians: Survey instrument valuation, Proc AMIA Symp, (2000), pp. 185-189
38. W. J. DOLL AND M. U. AHMED, Managing user expectations, J of Systems Management, 34 (1983), pp. 6-11
39. J. M. EISENBERG, D. S. KITZ, AND R. A. WEBBER, Development of attitudes about sharing decision-making: A comparison of medical and surgical residents, J Health Soc Behav, 24 (1983), pp. 85-90
40. M. FISHBEIN AND I. AJZEN, Beliefs, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975
41. M. P. GAGNON, G. GODIN, C. GAGNE, J. P. FORTIN, L. LAMOTHE, D. REINHARZ, AND A. CLOUTIER, An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behaviour to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians, Int J Med Inform, 71 (2003), pp. 103-115
42. C. A. GAITHER, R. P. BAGOZZI, F. J. ASCIONE, AND D. M. KIRKING, A reasoned action approach to physicians' utilization of drug information sources, Pharm Res, 13 (1996), pp. 1291-1298
43. C. L. GATCH AND K. D, Predicting exercise intentions: The theory of planned behavior, Research Quarterly For Exercise and Sport, 61 (1990), pp. 100-102
44. D. GEFEN AND D. STRAUB, Gender difference in the perception and use of E-Mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model, MIS Quarterly, 21 (1997), pp. 389-400
45. G. GODIN, P. VALLOIS, L. LEPAGE, AND R. DESHARNAIS, Predictors of smoking behavior: An application of Ajzen's theory of planned behavior, British Journal of Addition, 87 (1992), pp. 1335-1343
46. M. S. HAGGER, N. L. D. CHATZISARANTIS, AND S. J. H. BIDDLE, Meta-analysis of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: An examination of predictive validity and the contri-bution of additional variables, J of Sport and Exercise Psychol, 24 (2002), pp. 3-32
47. C. HARTLEY, M. BRECHT, P. PAGERLY, G. WEEKS, A. CHAPANIS, AND D. HOECKER, Subjective time estimates of work tasks by office workers J of Occupational Psychology, 50 (1977), pp. 23-36
48. P. HU, P. Y. K. CHAU, O. R. L. SHENG, AND K. Y. TAM, Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology, J of Management Information Systems, 16 (1999), pp. 91-112
49. G. S. HUBONA AND P. H. CHENEY, System effectiveness of knowledge-based technology: The relationship of user performance and attitudinal measures, in HICSS '94: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-27) Volume 4, Washington, DC, USA, 1994, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 532-541
50. M. IGBARIA, T. GUIMARAES, AND G. B. DAVIS, Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model, J of MIS, 11 (1995), pp. 87-114
51. M. IGBARIA, J. IIVARI, AND H. MARAGAHH, Why do individuals use computer technology? a Finnish case study, Information & Management, 29 (1995), pp. 227-238
52. B. KAPLAN, Addressing organizational issues into the evaluation of medical systems, Academy of Management Journal, 4 (1997), pp. 94-101
53. B. KAPLAN, Evaluating informatics applications - some alternative approaches: Theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism, Int J Med Inform, 64 (2001), pp. 39-56
54. E. KARAHANNA, D. W. STRAUB, AND N. L. CHERVANY, Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and postadoption beliefs, MIS Quarterly, 23 (1999), pp. 183-213
55. Y. KASHIMA, C. GALLOIS, AND M. MCCAMISH, Theory of reasoned action and cooperative behavior: It takes two to use a condom, British Journal of Social Psychology, 32 (1993), pp. 227-239
56. H. C. KELMAN, Compliance, identification, and internalization: three processes of attitude change?, J of Conflict Resolution, 2 (1958), pp. 51-60
57. T. H. KWON AND R. W. ZMUD, Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation, in Critical issues in information systems research, R. J. Boland and R. A. Hirschheim, eds., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, England, 1987, pp. 227-251
58. Y. LEE, K. A. KOZAR, AND K. R. T. LARSEN, The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future, Communications of the AIS, 12 (2003), pp. 752-780
59. F. LEGARE, G. GODIN, V. RINGA, S. DODIN, L. TURCOT, AND J. NORTON, Variation in the psychosocial determinants of the intention to prescribe hormone therapy prior to the release of the Women's Health Initiative trial: A survey of general practitioners and gynaecologists in France and Quebec, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 5 (2005), p. 31
60. H. P. LUNDSGAARDE, P. A. FISHCHER, AND D. J. STEELE, Human problems in computerized medicine, in Publications in Anthropology, 13, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 1981
61. Y. MALHOTRA AND D. F. GALLETTA, Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoritical bases and empirical validation, in HICSS '99: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (32), vol. 1, Washington, DC, USA, 1999, IEEE Computer Society, p. 1006
62. T. A. MASSARO, Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: I. impact on organizational couture and behavior, Acad Med, 68 (1993), pp. 20-25
63. K. MATHIESON, Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior, Information Systems Research, 2 (1991), pp. 173-191
64. K. MATHIESON, E. PEACOCK, AND W. W. CHIN, Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources ACM SIGMIS Database, 32 (2001), pp. 86-112
65. S. K. MAUE, R. SEGAL, C. L. KIMBERLIN, AND E. E. LIPOWSKI, Predicting physician guideline compliance: An assessment of motivators and perceived barriers, The American J of Managed Care, 10 (2004), pp. 382-391
66. E. MAYO, The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization, MacMillan, New York, NY, USA, 1933
67. G. C. MOORE AND I. BENBASAT, Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation Information Systems Research, 2 (1991), pp. 173-191
68. D. M. MORRISON, M. S. SPENCER, AND M. R. GILLMORE, Beliefs about substance use among pregnant and parenting adolescents, J Res Adolesc, 8 (1998), pp. 69-95
69. R. S. NICKERSON, Why interactive computer systems are sometimes not used by people who might benefit from them, Int J Human-Computer Studies, 51 (1999), pp. 307-321
70. M. H. OLSON AND H. C. LUCAS, The impact of office automation on the organization: Some implications for research and practice, Commun ACM, 25 (1982), pp. 838-847
71. G. PARÉ, C. SICOTTE, AND H. JACQUES, The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians' acceptance of clinical information systems, J Am Med Inform Assoc, 13 (2006), pp. 197-205
72. D. PARKER, A. S. R. MANSTEAD, S. G. STRADLING, AND J. REASON, Intention to commit driving violations: An application of the theory of planned behavior, J of Applied Psychology, 77 (1992), pp. 94-101
73. M. B. PRESCOTT AND S. A. CONGER, Information technology innovations: A classification by it locus of impact and research approach, SIGMIS Database, 26 (1995), pp. 20-41
74. E. M. ROGERS, Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York, 1983. 3rd ed
75. E. M. ROGERS, Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York, 1995. 4th ed
76. V. SAMBAMURTHY AND C. W.W., The effects of group attitudes toward alternative gdss designs on the decision-making performance of computer-supported groups, Decision Sciences, 25 (1994), pp. 215-241
77. N. SCHWARZ AND D. OYSERMAN, Asking questions about behavior: cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction, American J of Evaluation, 22 (2001), pp. 127-160
78. A. SHARMA, Professionals as agent: Knowledge asymmetry in agengy exchanges, Academy of Management Review, 22 (1997), pp. 758-798
79. B. H. SHEPPARD, J. HARTWICK, AND P. R. WARSHAW, The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research, J of Consumer Behavior, 15 (1988), pp. 325-343
80. D. E. SICHEL, The Computer Revolution: An Economic Perspective Brookings, Washington, DC, 1997
81. D. STRAUB, M. KEIL, AND W. BRENNER, Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study, Information & Management, 33 (1997), pp. 1-11
82. J. STROSS AND G. BOLE, Evaluation of a continuing education program in rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis and rheumatism, Arthritis Rheum, 23 (1980), pp. 846-849
83. G. SUBRAMNIAN, A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement, Decision Sciences, 25 (1994), pp. 863-874
84. M. J. SUCCI AND Z. D. WALTER, Theory of user acceptance of information technologies: An examination of health care professionals in HICSS '99: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-32), Los Alamitos, CA, 1999, IEEE Computer Society
85. H. SUN AND P. ZHANG, The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance, Int J Human-Computer Studies, 64 (2006), pp. 53-78
86. E. B. SWANSON, Information System Implementation: Bridging the Gap between Design and Utilization, Irwin, Homewood, IL, 1988
87. B. SZAJNA, Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model, Management Sci, 42 (1996), pp. 85-92
88. S. TAYLOR AND P. TODD, Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing model, Information Systems Research, 6 (1995), pp. 145-176
89. R. L. THOMPSON, C. A. HIGGINS, AND J. M. HOWELL, Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization, MIS Quarterly, 15 (1991), pp. 124-143
90. R. L. THOMPSON, C. A. HIGGINS, AND J. M. HOWELL, Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model Journal of Management Information Systems, 11 (1994), pp. 167-187
91. L. TORNATZKY AND K. KLEIN, Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: A meta-analysis of findings, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29 (1982), pp. 28-45
92. M. L. TUSHMAN AND T. J. SCANLAN, Boundary spanning individuals: their role in information-transfer and their antecedents, Academy of Management Journal, 24 (1981), pp. 289-305
93. V. VENKATESH, Determinants of perceived ease of use integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model, Information Systems Research, 11 (2000), pp. 342-365
94. V. VENKATESH AND F. D. DAVIS, A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use development and test, Decision Sciences, 27 (1996), pp. 451-481
95. V. VENKATESH AND F. D. DAVIS, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies, Management Sci, 46 (2000), pp. 186-204
96. V. VENKATESH AND M. G. MORRIS, Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior, MIS Quarterly, 24 (2000), pp. 115-139
97. V. VENKATESH, M. G. MORRIS, G. B. DAVIS, AND F. D. DAVIS, User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly, 27 (2003), pp. 425-478