The latest developments for in-situ rock stress measuring techniques

Proceedings of the International Symposium on In-situ Rock Stress - In-situ Rock Stress Measurement, Interpretation and Application

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 3-10

  Christiansson, R ^a  

^a SWEDISH NUCLEAR FUEL AND WASTE MANAGEMENT CO   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CONTROL SYSTEMS; CRYSTALLINE ROCKS; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA HANDLING; PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION; ROCK MECHANICS; STRESSES;

COMPUTING CAPACITY; CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENTS; CONVERGENCE MEASUREMENT; FINAL REPOSITORIES; LARGE-SCALE MEASUREMENT; MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES; MEASURING TECHNIQUE; SITE INVESTIGATIONS;

STRESS MEASUREMENT;

EID: 34250311720     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1201/9781439833650.pt1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Amadei B. & Stephansson O. 1997. Rock stress and its measurement. London: Chapman & Hall.
2. Andersson C., Fälth B., & Kristensson. 2006. Äspö Pillar Stability Experiment - TM back calculations. Geoproc2006. Nanjing, China.
3. Ask M. Ask D. & Christiansson R. 2006. Detection of borehole breakouts at shallow depths in boreholes KFM01A and B, Forsmark site, Sweden. In Proc. International Symposium on In-situ Rock Stress, Trondheim, June 19-21, 2006. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.
4. Brady B.H.G., Lemos J.V. & Cundall P.A. 1986. Stress measurement schemes for jointed and fractured rock. In Proc. of the International Symposium on Rock Stresses and Rock Stress Measurements, Stockholm. Centec publisher, Luleå. 1986 pp. 167-176.
5. Christiansson R. & Hudson J.A. 2003. ISRM Suggested Methods for rock stress estimation - Part 4: Quality control of rock stress estimation. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40(7-8): 1021-1025.
6. Cornet F.H., Doan M.L. & Fontbonne F. 2003. Electrical imaging and hydraulic testing for complete stress determination. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40(7-8): 1225-1241.
7. Haimson B.C. & Cornet F.H. 2003. ISRM Suggested Methods for rock stress estimation - Part 3: hydraulic fracturing (HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF). Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40(7-8): 1011-1020.
8. Hakala M. 1999a. Numerical study on core damage and interpretation of in-situ state of stress. Posiva report: 99-25.
9. Hakala M. 1999b. Numerical study of core disk fracturing and interpretation of the in-situ state of stress. In Proceedings Ninth International Congress on Rock Mechanics, Paris, 1999, Vol 2: 1149-1153. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
10. Hakala M., Hudson J.A. & Christiansson R. 2003. Quality control of overcoring stress measurement data. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40(7-8): 1141-1159.
11. Hakami E., Hakami H. & Christiansson R. 2006. Depicting a plausible in situ stress distribution by numerical analysis - examples from two candidate sites in Sweden In Proc. International Symposium on In-situ Rock Stress, Trondheim, June 19-21, 2006. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
12. Hart R. 2003. Enhancing rock stress understanding through numerical analysis. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40(7-8): 1089-1097.
13. Hiltcher R., Martna J. & Strindell L. 1979. The measurements of triaxial rock stresses in deep boreholes. In: Proc. Of the Fourth Int. Congress on Rock Mechanics, Motreaux, Vol. 2. Rotterdam: Balkema; 1979, pp. 227-234.
14. Hudson J.A., Cornet F.H., & Chistiansson R. 2003. ISRM suggested method for rock stress estimation - Part 1: Strategy for rock stress estimation. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40(7-8): 991-998.
15. Ito T., Evans K., Kawai K. & Hayashi K. 1999. Hydraulic fracturing reopening pressure and the estimation of maximum horizontal stress. Int. J. Rock Mech.Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 36: 811-826.
16. Lim S.S., Martin C.D. & Christiansson R. 2006. Estimating in-situ stress from core disking. In Proc. International Symposium on In-situ Rock Stress, Trondheim, June 19-21, 2006. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
17. Martin C.D. 1997. Seventeenth Canadian Geothechnical Colloquium: The effect of cohesion loss and stress path on brittle rock strength. Can. Geotech. J. 34 (5): 698-725.
18. Martin C.D., Martino J.B. & Dzik E.J. 1994. Comparison of borehole breakouts from laboratory and field tests. Proc. EUROCK'94, SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering, Delft, A.A. Balkema, 1994, 183-190.
19. Rutqvist J., Tsang C-F. & Stephansson O. 2000. Uncertainty in the principal stress estimated from hydraulic fracturing measurements due to the presence of the induced fracture. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 37: 107-120.
20. Staub I., Andersson C. & Magnor B. 2004. Äspö pillar stability experiment. Geology and mechanical properties in the TASQ. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB. Report SKBR-04-01.
21. Sjöberg J. & Klasson H. 2003. Stress measurements in deep boreholes using the Borre (SSPB) probe. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40(7-8): 1205-1223.
22. Sjöberg J., Christiansson R. & Hudson J.A. 2003. ISRM Suggested Methods for rock stress estimation - Part 2: overcoring methods. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40(7-8): 999-1010.
23. Sjöberg J., Ask D., Lindfors U., Perman F. & Christiansson R. 2006. Reliable Stress Assessment using Measurements, Observations and Analysis. In Proc. International Symposium on In-situ Rock Stress, Trondheim, June 19-21, 2006. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
24. SKB. 2001. Site investigations. Investigation methods and general execution programme. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB. Technical Report, TR-01-29.
25. SKB. 2005. Preliminary site description. Forsmark area - version 1.2. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB. Report SKBR-05-18.
26. SKB. 2006. Preliminary Site description. Laxemar area - version 1.2. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, Report R-06-10.