Polar body diagnosis in cases with cytogenetic predisposition;Polkörperdiagnostik bei zytogenetischer prädisposition

Gynakologische Endokrinologie

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 21-25

  Montag, M ^a   Schultze Mosgau, A ^b   Van Der Ven, K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BONN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Genetic predisposition; In vitro fertilization; Mosaic; Polar body diagnosis; Translocation

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME DISORDER; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; HUMAN; MALE; OOCYTE; PERIPHERAL LYMPHOCYTE; POLAR BODY DIAGNOSIS; PREGNANCY; SEX CHROMOSOME MOSAICISM;

EID: 34250309709     PISSN: 16102894     EISSN: 16102908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10304-006-0172-7     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bonduelle M, Van Assche E, Joris H et al. (2002) Prenatal testing in ICSI pregnancies: incidence of chromosomal anomalies in 1586 karyotypes and relation to sperm parameters. Hum Reprod 17: 2600-2614
2. Buchholz T, Clement-Sengewald A (2004) Polkörperdiagnostik bei Translokationsträgerinnen. Med Genetik 16: 416-421
3. Buchholz T, Vogt U, Clement-Sengewald A (2006) Polkörperdiagnostik - Erfahrungen und neue Entwicklungen. J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol 4: 215-218
4. Clement-Sengewald A, Vogt U, Berg FD et al. (2005) Kombinierte Aneuploidie- und Translokationsdiagnostik an Polkörpern. J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol 5: 320-321
5. Durban M, Benet J, Boada M et al. (2001) PGD in female carriers of balanced Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations by first polar body analysis. Hum Reprod Update 7: 591-602
6. Gekas J, Thepot F, Turleau C et al. (2001) Chromosomal factors of infertility in candidate couples for ICSI: an equal risk of constitutional aberrations in women and men. Hum Reprod 16: 82-90
7. Guttenbach M, Martinez-Expoistó MJ, Michelmann HW et al. (1997) Incidence of diploid and disomic sperm nuclei in 45 infertile men. Hum Reprod 12: 468-473
8. Harper JC, Boelaert K, Geraedts J et al. (2006) ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection V: cycles from January to December 2002 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2003. Hum Reprod 21: 3-21
9. Hens L, Bonduelle M, Liebaers I et al. (1988) Chromosome aberrations in 500 couples referred for in-vitro fertilization or related fertility treatment. Hum Reprod 3: 451-457
10. Mau UA, Backert IT, Kaiser P, Kiesel L (1997) Chromosomal findings in 150 couples referred for genetic counselling prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 12: 930-937
11. Meschede D, Lemcke B, Exeler JR et al. (1998) Chromosome abnormalities in 447 couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection - prevalence, types, sex distribution and reproductive relevance. Hum Reprod 13: 576-582
12. Montag M, Limbach N, Sabarstinski M (2005) Polar body biopsy and aneuploidy testing by simultaneous detection of 6 chromosomes. Prenatal Diag 25: 867-871
13. Montag M, van der Ven K, van der Ven H et al. (2007) Polkö rperdiagnostik zur Aneuploidie-Testung. In: Felberbaum RE, Bühler K, van der Ven H (Hrsg) Das Deutsche IVF-Register 1996-2006. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, S 113-117
14. Morel F, Gallon E, Amice V et al. (2002) Sex chromosome mosaicism in couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 17: 2552-2555
15. Munné S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T et al. (2000) Outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations. Fertil Steril 73: 1209-1218
16. Pätzold UM (2004) Molekularzytogenetische Untersuchungen an Keimzellen von Männern mit gestörter Spermiogenese. Inaugural Dissertation der Hohen Medizinischen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, S 1-172
17. Peschka B, Leygraaf J, van der Ven K et al. (1999) Type and frequency of chromosome aberrations in 781 couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 14: 2259-2263
18. Scholtes MC, Behrend C, Dietzel-Dahmen J et al. (1998) Chromosomal aberrations in couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection: influence on implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 70: 933-937
19. Sonntag B, Meschede D, Ullmann V et al. (2001) Low-level sex chromosome mosaicism in female partners of couples undergoing ICSI therapy does not significantly affect treatment outcome. Hum Reprod 16: 1648-1652
20. Speed RM (1986) Oocyte development in XO foetuses of man and mouse: the possible role of heterologous chromosome pairing in germ cell survival. Chromosomes 94: 115-124
21. Speed RM (1988) The possible role of meiotic pairing anomalies in the atresia of human fetal oocytes. Hum Genet 78: 260-266
22. Toncheva D, Ilieva P, Mavrudieva M (1994) Detection of low level sex-chromosomal mosaicism. Genet Counsel 5: 363-367
23. Van der Ven H, Montag M, van der Ven K et al. (2004) Prospektiv randomisierte multizentrische Studie zum Nachweis des Vorteils einer Aneuploidie-Testung nach Polkörperbiopsie bei der künstlichen Befruchtung. Med Genetik 16: 413-415
24. Voigt R, Schröder AK, Hinrichs F et al. (2004) Low-level gonosomal mosaicism in women undergoing ICSI cycles. J Ass Reprod Genet 21: 149-155