Clinical revenue investment in biomedical research: Lessons from two academic medical centers

JAMA

Volumn 297, Issue 22, 2007, Pages 2521-2524

  Bowman, Marjorie A ^a   Rubenstein, Arthur H ^a   Levine, Arthur S ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY; TRASTUZUMAB;

AORTA ANEURYSM; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; FUNDING; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HOSPITAL PLANNING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SCHOOL; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE; ARTICLE; ECONOMICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; INVESTMENT; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; INVESTMENTS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; PENNSYLVANIA; RESEARCH SUPPORT;

EID: 34250303999     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.22.2521     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Moore DB. NIH advocacy tool kit. Group on Institutional Advancement Professional Development Conference of the Association of American Medical Colleges; March 29, 2007; Tampa, Fla.
2. Moy E, Griner PF, Challoner DR, Perry DR. Distribution of research awards from the National Institutes of Health among medical schools. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:250-255.
3. Joiner KA, Wormsley S. Strategies for defining financial benchmarks for the research mission in academic health centers. Acad Med. 2005;80:211-217.
4. Quon A. Changes in US medical schools' NIH rankings, 1991-2000. Association of American Medical Colleges Web site. http://www.aamc.org/data/aib/ aibissues/aibvol1_no3.pdf. Accessed March 14, 2006.
5. Lombardi JV, Capaldo ED, Reeves KR, Craig DD, Gater DS, Rivers D. The top American research universities: an annual report from the Lombardi Program on Measuring University Performance. Gainesville: The Center at the University of Florida; 2003.
6. Lombardi JV, Capaldi ED, Mirka DS, Abbey CW. The top American research universities: an annual report from the Lombardi Program on Measuring University Performance. Gainesville: The Center at the University of Florida; 2005.
7. Rodin J. A revisionist view of the integrated academic health center. Acad Med. 2004;79:171-178.
8. Levin S. Empire building: consolidation and controversy at UPMC. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. December 27, 2005:A1.
9. Bland CJ, Center BC, Finstad DA, Risbey KR, Staples JG. A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Acad Med. 2005;80:225-237.
10. AAMC Faculty Roster Benchmark Reports. US medical school faculty trends: 2004 full-time faculty by degree and department. Template Report, Table 6. Association of American Medical Colleges Web site. http://www.aamc.org/data/ facultyroster/usmsf04/start.htm. Accessed May 21, 2007.
11. AAMC Faculty Roster Benchmark Reports. Custom report: 2004 faculty by degree by school; comparison group: all regions. Association of American Medical Colleges Website. http://www.aamc.org/data/facultyroster/reports.htm. Accessed May 21, 2007.
12. Rajan TV, Clive J. NIH research grants: funding and re-funding [letter]. JAMA. 2000;283:1963.
13. Mallon WT, Biebuyck JF, Jones RF. The reorganization of basic science departments in US medical schools, 1980-1999. Acad Med. 2003;78:302-306.
14. Konetzka RT, Zhu J, Volpp KG. Did recent changes in Medicare reimbursement hit teaching hospitals harder? Acad Med. 2005;80:1069-1074.
15. AAMC Task Force II on Clinical Research. Promoting Translational and Clinical Science: The Critical Role of Medical Schools and Teaching Hospitals. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2006.