Organizing human functioning and rehabilitation research into distinct scientific fields. Part II: Conceptual descriptions and domains for research

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 299-307

  Stucki, Gerold ^a,b,d   Reinhardt, Jan D ^b   Grimby, Gunnar ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b SWISS PARAPLEGIC RESEARCH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^d LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Classification; ICF; Rehabilitation; Research; Science

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOENGINEERING; BIOMEDICINE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CURRICULUM; DISABILITY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; INCIDENCE; INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; INTERVENTION STUDY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICAL DISEASE; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREVALENCE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION CARE; REHABILITATION CENTER; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; REHABILITATION RESEARCH; STAFF TRAINING; THEORY CONSTRUCTION; THEORY VALIDATION; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; CLASSIFICATION; CONCEPT FORMATION; EDUCATION; HUMAN; MEDICINE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REHABILITATION; RESEARCH; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; REHABILITATION; RESEARCH; SPECIALTIES, MEDICAL; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 34250221976     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0051     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Grimby G, Melvin J, Stucki G. The international classification of functioning, disability and health: A unifying model for the conceptualization, organization and development of human functioning and rehabilitation research. Foreword. J Rehabil Med 2007; 39: 277-278.
2. Stucki G, Grimby G. Organizing human functioning and rehabilitation research into distinct scientific fields. Part I: Developing a comprehensive structure from the cell to society. J Rehabil Med 2007; 39: 293-298.
3. Brandt EN, Pope AM editors. Enabling America. Assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. IOM, Washington, DC: National Academic Press; 1997.
4. Frontera WR, Fuhrer MJ, Jette AM, Chan L, Cooper RA, Duncan PW. Rehabilitation medicine summit: building research capacity. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 913-917.
5. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
6. Stucki G, Melvin J. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A unifying model for the conceptual description of physical and rehabilitation medicine. J Rehabil Med 2007; 39: 286-292.
7. Popper KR. Die Logik der Forschung. Wien: Springer; 1934 (The logics of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson; 1959).
8. Chalmers AF. What is this thing called science? An assessment of the nature and status of science and its methods. Third edition. Maidenhead: Open University Press and McGraw-Hill; 1999.
9. Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962.
10. Thompson W (Lord Kelvin). Popular lectures and addresses. London: Macmillan; 1881, vol. 1, p. 80.
11. Siegert RJ, McPherson KM, Dean SG. Theory development and a science of rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 1493-1501.
12. Rosenfield PL. The potential of transdiciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med 1992; 35: 1343-1357.
13. Ross CE, Mirowsky J. Explaining the social patterns of depression: control and problem solving - or support and talking? J Health Soc Behav 1989; 30: 206-219.
14. Parsons T. The sick role and the role of the physician reconsidered. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 1975; 53: 257-278.
15. Williams SJ. Parsons revisited: from the sick role to...? Health 2005; 9: 123-144.
16. Dijkers MPJM, Yavuzer G, Ergin S, Weitzenkamp D, Whiteneck GG. A tale of two countries: environmental impacts on social participation after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2002; 40: 351-362.
17. Pearlin LI. The sociological study of stress. J Health Soc Behav 1989; 30: 241-256.
18. Wang PP, Badley EM, Gignac M. Exploring the role of contextual factors in disability models. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 135-140.
19. Stucki G. The international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). A promising framework and classification for rehabilitation medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 733-740.
20. Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health related quality of life instruments based on the ICF. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 1225-1237.
21. Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kolleritz B, Chatterji S, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 205-210.
22. Stucki G, Grimby G. Applying the ICF in medicine. J Rchabil Med 2004; 36 Suppl. 44: 5-6.
23. Üstün B, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N. Comments from WHO for the Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine special supplement on ICF core sets. J Rehabil Med 2004; 36 Suppl. 44: 7-8.
24. Cieza A, Ewert T, Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. Development of ICF core sets for patients with chronic conditions. J Rehabil Med 2004; 36 Suppl. 44: 9-11.
25. Stucki G, Üstün TB, Melvin J. Applying the ICF for the acute hospital and early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 349-352.
26. Grill E, Ewert T, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF Core Set development for the acute hospital and early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 361-366.
27. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Ann Rev Public Health 1998; 19: 173-202.
28. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Üstün B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 212-218.
29. Klemm J, Parry J, Palmer S, editors. Health impact assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
30. Mindell J, Ison E, Joffe M. A glossary for health impact assessment. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003; 57: 647-651.
31. Gebbie K, Rosenstock L, Hernandez LM, editors. Who will keep the public healthy? Educating public health professionals for the 21st century. IOM, Washington, DC: National Academic Press; 2003.
32. Field MJ, Feasley JC, editors. Health services research: work force and educational issues. IOM, Washington DC: National Academic Press; 1995.
33. National Institute of Health (NIH). Community-based participatory research. NIH, Division of Extramural Research and Training. October 2005. Available at URL: www.niehs.nih.gov/translat/cbpr/cbpr.htm
34. Gostin LO. Public health law in a new century. Part I: law as a tool to advance the community's health. JAMA 2000; 283: 2837-2841.
35. Boden LL. Policy evaluation: Better living through research. Am J Industr Med 1996; 29: 346-352. Quoted from (30).
36. Wessels T, van Tulder M, Sigl T, Ewert T, Limm H, Stueki G. What predicts outcome in non-operative treatments of chronic low back pain? A systematic review. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 1633-1644. Epub 2006 Mar 31.
37. Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E, Uebelhart D, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 1098-1107.
38. Whyte J. Training and retention of rehabilitation researchers. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 969-975.
39. Stucki G. Developing human functioning and rehabilitation research. Part I: Academic training programs. J Rehabil Med 2007; 39: 323-333.
40. Goldman L, Cook EF, Orav J, Epstein AM, Komaroff AL, Delbanco TL, et al. Research training in clinical effectiveness: replacing "in my experience..." with rigorous clinical investigation. Clin Res 1990; 38: 686-693.
41. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC. On the need for evidence based medicine. J Pub Health Med 1995; 17: 330-334.
42. Stucki G, Sangha O. Clinical quality management: Putting the pieces together. Arthritis Care Res 1996; 9: 405-412.
43. Barrows HS. Problem based learning in medicine and beyond: a brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 1996; 68: 3-12.
44. Petersson IF. Team Care. Traditions and new trends. J Rheumatol 2006; 33: 1895-1896.
45. Reilly C. Transdisciplinary approach: An atypical strategy for improving outcomes in rehabilitative and long-term acute care settings. Rehabil Nurs 2001; 26: 216-220.
46. Liebowitz S J, DeMuse KP. The application of team building. Human Relations 1982; 16: 1-18.
47. Allan CM, Campbell WN, Guptill CA, Stephenson FF, Campbell KE. A conceptual model for interprofessional education: The international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). J Interprof Care 2006; 20: 235-245.