Biomechanical effect of major extremity vessels choosing repair methods for peripheral artery injury

Chinese Journal of Traumatology - English Edition

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 154-158

  Jie, Qiang ^a   Yang, Liu ^a   Zhu, Qing Sheng ^a   Zhao, Li ^a   Li, Ming Quan ^a  

^a FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Anastomosis, surgical; Biomechanics; Blood vessels; Wounds and injuries

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY ANASTOMOSIS; ARTERY INJURY; ARTERY RECONSTRUCTION; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BRACHIAL ARTERY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; END TO END ANASTOMOSIS; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT CONTRACTURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POPLITEAL ARTERY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SALVAGE THERAPY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VEIN GRAFT;

EID: 34250218591     PISSN: 10081275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Yupu L, Yaotian H, Li Z, et al. Management of major arterial injuries of limbs: a study of 166 cases. Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 1: 486-488.
2. Lovric Z, Wertheimer B, Candrlic K, et al. War injuries of major extremity vessels. J Trauma 1994; 36:248-251.
3. Dilley RJ, McGeachie JK, Tennant M. Vein to artery grafts: a morphological and histochemical study of the histogenesis of intimal hyperplasia. Aust N Z J Surg 1992; 62: 297-303.
4. Dilley RJ, McGeachie JK, Prendergast FJ. A review of the histologic changes in vein-to-artery grafts, with particular reference to intimal hyperplasia. Arch Surg 1988; 123: 691-696.
5. Chervu A, Moore WS. An overview of intimal hyperplasia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 171: 433-447.
6. McGeachie JK, Meagher S, Prendergast FJ. Vein-to-artery grafts: the long-term development of neo-intimal hyperplasia and its relationship to vasa vasorum and sympathetic innervation. Aust N Z J Surg 1989; 59:59-65.
7. Han HC, Fung YC. Longitudinal strain of canine and porcine aortas. J Biomech 1995; 28:637-41.
8. Raghavan ML, Trivedi S, Nagaraj A, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of residual stress in arteries. Ann Biomed Eng 2004; 32: 257-263.
9. Matsumoto T, Goto T, Furukawa T, et al. Residual stress and strain in the lamellar unit of the porcine aorta: experiment and analysis. J Biomech 2004; 37:807-815.
10. Han HC, Zhao L, Huang M, et al. Postsurgical changes of the opening angle of canine autogenous vein graft. J Biomech Eng 1998; 120: 211-216.
11. Gu YD. Biomechanical problems of microsurgical operations. Chin J Surg 1985; 23: 697-700.
12. Rachev A, Greenwald SE. Residual strains in conduit arteries. J Biomech 2003; 36: 661-670.
13. Davis CB 2nd, Smith BM, Hagen PO, et al. The strength of microvascular anastomoses: an experimental evaluation in rats. J Microsurg 1982; 3:156-161.
14. Gilbert RW, Ragnarsson R, Berggren A, et al. Strength of microvascular anastomoses: comparison between the unilink anastomotic system and sutures. Microsurgery 1989; 10: 40-46.
15. Flemming AF, Bown SG, Colles MJ, et al. Comparison of laser-assisted and conventionally sutured microvascular anastomoses by bursting pressure: a reanalysis and further studies. Microsurgery 1990; 11:25-33.
16. Zhang F, Lineaweaver WC, Buntic R. Mechanical evaluation of anastomotic tension and patency in arteries. J Reconstr Microsurg 1996; 12:121-126.
17. Hou LS, Huang YT, Zhao MG. Biomechanical investigation of vein graft length in lapin. J Fourth Milit Med Univ 1998; 19: 443-445.