STI Research: Recruiting an Unbiased Sample

Journal of Adolescent Health

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 14-18

  Reed, Jennifer L ^a   Thistlethwaite, Julie M ^b   Huppert, Jill S ^a  

^a CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent; Bias; Recruitment; Research; STI

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT HEALTH; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARENTAL CONSENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; RISK FACTOR; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TREATMENT REFUSAL; URINARY TRACT INFECTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEWS; LOGISTIC MODELS; PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES;

EID: 34250213216     PISSN: 1054139X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.02.010     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. The Alan Guttmacher Institute. An overview of minors' consent law. State Policies in Brief 2006 (2006). http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_OMCL.pdf [cited 2006 Nov 27]. Available from: http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_OMCL.pdf
2. English A., and Kenney K. State Minor Consent Laws: A Summary. 2nd edn. (2003), Center for Adolescent Health & the Law, Chapel Hill, NC
3. Reddy D.M., Fleming R., and Swain C. Effect of mandatory parental notification on adolescent girls' use of sexual health care services. JAMA 288 6 (2002) 710-714
4. Stanford P.D., Monte D.A., Briggs F.M., et al. Recruitment and retention of adolescent participants in HIV research: findings from the REACH (Reaching for Excellence in Adolescent Care and Health) Project. J Adolesc Health 32 3 (2003) 192-203
5. Geluda K., Bisaglia J.B., Moreira V., et al. Third-party informed consent in research with adolescents: the good, the bad and the ugly. Soc Sci Med 61 5 (2005) 985-988
6. O'Donnell L.N., Duran R.H., San Doval A., et al. Obtaining written parent permission for school-based health surveys of urban young adolescents. J Adolesc Health 21 6 (1997) 376-383
7. Mammel K.A., and Kaplan D.W. Research consent by adolescent minors and institutional review boards. J Adolesc Health 17 5 (1995) 323-330
8. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Adolescent Health Care. ACOG Committee Opinion #302: Guidelines for Adolescent Health Research. Obstet Gynecol 104 4 (2004) 899-901 Oct
9. Santelli J.S., Smith Rogers A., Rosenfeld W.D., et al. Guidelines for adolescent health research: a position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adolesc Health 33 (2003) 396-409
10. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (1979), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC
11. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Report and Recommendations: Research Involving Children (Recommendation 8) (1977), US Department of Health Education and Welfare, Washington, DC [Report No.: DHEW Pub. No. (05)77-0004]
12. Protection of Human Subjects (2005) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45 (Rev), Part 46.116 (d)
13. Protection of Human Subjects (2005) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45 (Rev), Part 46.408(c)
14. Kimberly M.B., Hoehn K.S., Feudtner C., et al. Variation in standards of research compensation and child assent practices: a comparison of 69 institutional review board-approved informed permission and assent forms for 3 multicenter pediatric clinical trials. Pediatrics 117 5 (2006) 1706-1711
15. Whittle A., Shah S., Wilfond B., et al. Institutional review board practices regarding assent in pediatric research. Pediatrics 113 6 (2004) 1747-1752
16. Freimuth V.S., Quinn S.C., Thomas S.B., et al. African Americans' views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Soc Sci Med 52 5 (2001) 797-808
17. Woolf S.H., Rothemich S.F., Johnson R.E., et al. Selection bias from requiring patients to give consent to examine data for health services research. Arch Fam Med 9 10 (2000) 1111-1118
18. Nathanson C., and Becker M. Family and peer influence on obtaining a method of contraception. J Marriage Fam 43 3 (1986) 513-525
19. Tanfer K., Cubbins L.A., and Billy J.O. Gender, race, class and self-reported sexually transmitted disease incidence. Fam Plann Perspect 27 5 (1995) 196-202