Fraud in science: Reflections on the Hwang affair;El fraude en la ciencia: Reflexiones a partir del caso Hwang

Profesional de la Informacion

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 143-150

  López Cózar, Emilio Delgado ^a   Salinas, Daniel Torres ^b   López, Álvaro Roldán ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^c INSTITUTO DE SALUD CARLOS III   (Spain)

Author keywords

Ethics; Hwang affair; Peer review; Scholarly publishing; Science; Scientific fraud; Scientific misconduct

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250202511     PISSN: 13866710     EISSN: 16992407     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3145/epi.2007.mar.07     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Armstrong, J. S. "Peer review for journals: evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation". En: Science and engineering ethics, 1997, v. 3, pp. 63-84.
2. Battaglia, M. Retractions 1966-99. Consultado en: 23-11-06. http://pages2.inrete.it/mbiomed/rtrx6699.htm
3. Campanario, J. M. "Commentary: on influential books and journal articles initially rejected because negative referees' evaluations". En: Science communication, 1995, v. 16, pp. 304-325.
4. Campanario, J. M. "El sistema de revisión por expertos (peer review): muchos problemas y pocas soluciones". En: Revista española de documentación científica, 2002, v. 25, n. 3, pp. 166-184.
5. Epstein, W. M. "Confirmational response bias among social work journals". En: Science, technology and human values, 1990, v. 15, pp. 9-38.
6. Friedman, L.; Richter, E. D. "Relationship between conflicts of interest and research". En: Journal of general and internal medicine, 2004, v. 19, pp. 51-56.
7. Jiménez, D. Entrevista al científico surcoreano Woo Suk Hwang, creador de 'Snuppy'. Consultado en: 18-11-06. http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2005/08/03/ciencia/1123078892.html
8. Jurdant, B. Imposturas científicas: los malentendidos del caso Sokal. Cátedra: Madrid, 2003, Isbn 84-376-2079-1.
9. Kleinert, S.; Theobald, J.; Wager, E.; Godlee, F. For which cases of suspected misconduct do editors seek advice? An observational study of all cases submitted to COPE. Consultado en: 18-11-06. http://www.ama- assn.org/public/peer/abstracts.html
10. Kobn, A. False prophets: fraud and error in science and medicine. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1988, Isbn 0-6311-6237-2.
11. Nath, S.; Marcus, S.; Druss, B. G. "Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?". En: The medical journal of Australia, 2006. v. 185, n. 3, pp. 152-154.
12. Peters, D. S.; Ceci, S. J. "Peer-review practices of psychological journals: the fate of published articles, submitted again". En: The behavioral artd brain sciences, 1982, v. 5, pp. 187-195.
13. Trocchio, F. Las mentiras de la ciencia. Madrid: Alianza, 1997, Isbn 84-206-3988-5.
14. Woloshin, S.; Schwartz, L. "Translating research into news". En: JAMA, 2002. v. 287, n. 21, pp. 2.856-2.858.