Objective assessment of facial asymmetry in rhinoplasty patients

Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 184-187

  Chatrath, Paul ^a   De Cordova, Jose ^a   Nouraei, S A Reza ^a   Ahmed, Jahangir ^a   Saleh, Hesham A ^a  

^a CHARING CROSS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ETHNIC GROUP; FACE; FACE ASYMMETRY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; REFERENCE VALUE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ETHNIC GROUPS; FACE; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES; RHINOPLASTY;

EID: 34250202205     PISSN: 15212491     EISSN: 15383660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.9.3.184     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Zaidel DW, Cohen JA. The face, beauty, and symmetry: perceiving asymmetry in beautiful faces. Int J Neurosci. 2005:115:1165-1173.
2. Cellerino A. Psychobiology of facial attractiveness. J Endocrinol Invest. 2003;26 (suppl):45-48.
3. Vuyk HD. A review of practical guidelines for correction of the deviated, asymmetric nose. Rhinology. 2000;38:72-78.
4. Stucker FJ Jr. Management of the scoliotic nose. Laryngoscope. 1982;92:128-134.
5. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ. Management of the deviated nose: the importance of septal reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 1988:15:43-55.
6. Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985:75:328-338.
7. Farkas LG, Kolar JC. Anthropometries and art in the aesthetics of women's faces. Clin Plast Surg. 1987:14:599-616.
8. Porter JP, Oison KL. Anthropometric facial analysis of the African American woman. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3:191-197.
9. Choe KS, Sclafani AP, Litner JA, Yu G-P, Romo T III. The Korean American woman's face: anthropometric measurements and quantitative analysis of facial aesthetics. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004:6:244-252.