Large negative Goos-Hanchen shift at metal surfaces

Optics Communications

Volumn 276, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 206-208

  Leung, P T ^a   Chen, C W ^b,c   Chiang, H P ^b,c  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN OCEAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Attenuating materials; Goos Hanchen shifts; Metal optics

Indexed keywords

NATURAL FREQUENCIES; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; REFLECTION; SEMICONDUCTOR METAL BOUNDARIES;

ATTENUATING MATERIALS; BREWSTER ANGLE; GOOS HANCHEN SHIFTS; METAL OPTICS;

LIGHT POLARIZATION;

EID: 34250195775     PISSN: 00304018     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2007.04.019     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Goos F., and Hanchen H. Ann. Phys. 1 (1947) 333
2. Goos F., and Hanchen H. Ann. Phys. 5 (1949) 251
3. For an earlier comprehensive review:. Lotsch H. Optik 32 (1970) 116
4. Lotsch H. Optik 32 (1971) 299
5. Lotsch H. Optik 32 (1971) 553
6. Lai H.M., et al. Phys. Rev. E 62 (2000) 7330
7. Wild W.J., and Giles C.L. Phys. Rev. A 25 (1982) 2099
8. Ivanov O.V., and Sementsov D.I. Opt. Spectrosc. 89 (2000) 737
9. Ivanov O.V., and Sementsov D.I. Opt. Spectrosc. 92 (2002) 462
10. Lai H.M., and Chan S.W. Opt. Lett. 27 (2002) 680
11. Lai H.M., Chan S.W., and Wong W.H. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 23 (2006) 3208
12. Wang L.G., Chen H., and Zhu S.Y. Opt. Lett. 30 (2005) 2936
13. Bonnet C., et al. Opt. Lett. 26 (2001) 666
14. Li C.F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 133903
15. Wang L.G., Chen H., Liu N.H., and Zhu S.Y. Opt. Lett. 31 (2006) 1124
16. He J., Yi J., and He S. Opt. Express 14 (2006) 3024
17. See, e.g.,. Wang L.G., and Zhu S.Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 (2005) 221102
18. Wang L.G., and Zhu S.Y. J. Appl. Phys. 98 (2005) 043522
19. Oliner A.A., and Tamir T. J. Appl. Phys. 33 (1962) 231
20. Tamir T., and Oliner A.A. Proc. IEEE 51 (1963) 317
21. Han D., Li X., Wu F., Liu X., and Zi J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 (2006) 161110
22. Palik E.D. Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids vol. 1 (1985), Academic Press
23. See Fig. 4(a) in Ref. [10].
24. For example, the imaginary part of our dielectric constant for the metal at 3390 nm is 68, compared to 0.5 used in Ref. [10] for their computation in Fig. 4(a).