Twenty-five years of end-user searching, part 2: Future research directions

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1123-1130

  Markey, Karen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXPERT SEARCHERS; SYSTEM INTERFACES;

EXPERT SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; USER INTERFACES;

ONLINE SEARCHING;

EID: 34250195377     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20601     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Bates, M.J. (1979). Information search tactics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30, 205-214.
2. Bates, M.J. (1989a). The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13, 407-424.
3. Bates, M.J. (1989b). Rethinking subject cataloging in the online environment. Library Resources and Technical Services, 33, 400-412.
4. Bates, M.J. (1990). Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? Information Processing & Management, 26, 575-591.
5. Bath University. (1972). Experimental information service in the social sciences 1969-1971; Final report. Bath, UK: Author.
6. Belkin, N.J. (1980). Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5, 133-143.
7. Belkin, N.J., Cool, C., Kelly, D., Lin, S.-J., Park, S.Y., Perez-Carbllo, J., et al. (2001). Exploration, design and evaluation of support for query reformulation in interactive information retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 37, 403-434.
8. Bhavnani, S.K. (2001). Important cognitive components of domain-specific search knowledge. In E.M. Voorhees & L.P. Buckland (Eds.), The Tenth Text Retrieval Conference (pp. 571-578). Washington, DC: Department of Commerce and National Institute of Standards and Technology.
9. Bhavnani, S.K., Bichakjian, C.K., Johnson, T.M., Little, R.J., Peck, F.A., Schwartz, J.L., et al. (2003). Strategy hubs: Next-generation domain portals with search procedures. In CHI Conference Proceedings: Conference on Human Factors In Computing Systems (pp. 393-400). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
10. Debowski, S. (2001). Wrong way: Go back! An exploration of novice search behaviours while conducting an information search. The Electronic Library, 19, 371-382.
11. Drabenstott, K.M. (2003). Do non-domain experts enlist the strategies of domain experts? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 836-854.
12. Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design. Journal of Documentation, 45, 171-212.
13. Fallows, D. (2004). Search engine users: Internet searchers are confident, satisfied, and trusting - but they are also unaware and naïve. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved March 2, 2007, from http://www.- pewinternet.org/PPF/r/146/report_display.asp
14. Fidel, R., Davies, R.C., Douglas, M.H., Holder, J.K., Hopkins, C.J., Kushner, E.J., et al. (1999). A visit to the information mall: Web searching behavior of high school students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50, 24-37.
15. Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Gomez, L.M., & Dumais, S.T. (1987). The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Communications of the ACM, 30, 964-971.
16. Oroxis, Inc. (2005). Grokker: A new way to look at search. Retrieved March 2, 2007, from http://www.grokker.com/
17. Halcoussis, D., Halverson, A.L., Lowenberg, A.D., & Lowenberg, S. (2002). An empirical analysis of web catalog user experiences. Information Technology and Libraries, 21, 148-157.
18. Hill, J.R. (1997). The World Wide Web as a tool for information retrieval: An exploratory study of users' strategies in an open-ended system. School Library Media Quarterly, 25, 229-236.
19. Horowitz, G.L., & Bleich, H.L. (1981). PaperChase: A computer program to search the medical literature. New England Journal of Medicine, 305, 924-930.
20. Hsieh-Yee, I. (1993). Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 44, 161-174.
21. Huang, M.-H. (1992). Behavior of end-users in online searching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
22. Jones, S., Cunningham, S.J., McNab, R., & Boddie, S. (2000). A transaction log analysis of a digital library. International Journal of Digital Libraries, 3, 152-169.
23. King, N.S. (1991). Search characteristics and the effects of experience on end users of PaperChase. College & Research Libraries, 52, 360-374.
24. Kuhlthau, C.C. (1993). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25. Lancaster, F.W., Elzy, C, Zeter, M.J., Metzler, L., & Low, Y.-M. (1994). Searching databases on CD-ROM: Comparison of the results of end-user searching with results from two modes of searching by skilled intermediaries. RQ, 33, 370-386.
26. Land, S.M., & Greene, B.A. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. ETR&D, 48, 45-67.
27. Lin, S.-J., & Belkin, N.J. (2000). Modeling multiple information seeking episodes. In M.K. Roderer & D.H. Kraft (Eds.), Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Vol. 37, pp. 133-147). Silver Spring, MD: American Society for Information Science and Technology.
28. Lucas, W., & Topi, H. (2002). From and function: The impact of query term and operator usage on Web search results. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 95-108.
29. Mann, T. (2003). Why LC subject headings are more important than ever. American Libraries, 34(9), 51-54.
30. Markey, K. (2007). Twenty-five years of end-user searching, part 1: Research findings. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(8), 1071-1081.
31. Markey, K., & Demeyer, A.N. (1986). Dewey Decimal Classification Online Project: Evaluation of a library schedule and index integrated into the subject searching capabilities of an online catalog. Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center.
32. Markoff, J. (2005, May 9). Your Internet search results, in the round. New York Times, p. C3.
33. Mischo, W.H., & Lee, J. (1987). End-user searching of bibliographic data-bases. In M.E. Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (pp. 227-263). Washington, DC: American Society for Information Science.
34. Pejtersen, A.M. (1992). The Book House: An icon based database system for fiction retrieval in public libraries. In B. Cronin (Ed.), The marketing of library and information services (Vol. 2, pp. 572-591). London: Aslib.
35. Peters, T.A. (1993). The history and development of transaction log analysis. Library Hi Tech, 11(2), 41-66.
36. Pew Research Center. (2003). America's online pursuits: The changing picture of who's online and what they do. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved September 5, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=106
37. Pew Research Center. (2005). Internet: The mainstreaming of online life. In Trends 2005 (pp. 65-77). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved September 5, 2005, from http://pewresearch.org/trends/
38. Rieh, S.Y. (2003). Investigating web searching behavior in home environments. In R.J. Todd (Ed.), Proceedings of the 66th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Vol. 40, pp. 255-264). Silver Spring, MD: American Society for Information Science and Technology.
39. Rieh, S.Y., & Xie, H.I. (2001). Patterns and sequences of multiple query reformulations in web searching: A preliminary study. In E. Aversa & C. Manley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Vol. 38, pp. 246-255). Silver Spring, MD: American Society for Information Science and Technology.
40. Robertson, S.E., & Hancock-Beaulieu, M.M. (1992). On the evaluation of IR systems. Information Processing & Management, 28, 457-466.
41. Rudner, L. (2000). Who is going to mine digital library resources'? And how? D-Lib Magazine 6, 5. Retrieved, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may00/ rudner/05rudner.html
42. Sewell, W., & Teitelbaum, S. (1986). Observations of end-user online searching behavior over eleven years. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37, 234-245.
43. Shannon, C.E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
44. Siegfried, S., Bates, M.J., & Wilde, D.N. (1993). A profile of end-user searching behavior by humanities scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report No. 2. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44, 273-291.
45. Silverstein, C., Marais, H., Henziger, M., & Monicz, M. (1999). Analysis of a very large web search engine query log. SIGIR Forum, 33(1), 6-12.
46. Spink, A. (1996). Multiple search sessions model of end-user behavior: An exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47, 603-609.
47. Spink, A., Griesdorf, H., & Bateman, J. (1999). A study of mediated successive searching during information seeking. Journal of Information Science, 25, 477-487.
48. Spink, A., Ozmutlu, H.C., & Lorence, D.P. (2004). Web searching for sexual information: An exploratory study. Information Processing and Management, 40, 113-123.
49. Spink, A., Wilson, T.D., Ford, N., Foster, A., & Ellis, D. (2002). Information seeking and mediated searching study. Part 3. Successive searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 53, 716-727.
50. Stenstrom, P., & McBride, R.B. (1979). Serial use by social science faculty: A survey. College & Research Libraries, 40, 426-431.
51. Stoan, S.K. (1984). Research and library skills: An analysis and interpretation. College & Research Libraries, 45, 99-109.
52. Sutcliffe, A.G., Ennis, M.. & Watkinson, S.J. (2000). Empirical studies of end-user information searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 1211-1231.
53. Tiefel, V. (1995). Library user education: Examining its past, projecting its future. Library Trends. 44, 318-338.
54. Trzebiatowski, E. (1984). End user study on BRS/Afterdark. RQ. 23, 446-450.
55. Vakkari, P. (2001). A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: A summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study. Journal of Documentation, 57, 44-60.
56. Vakkari, P., Pennanen, M., & Serola, S. (2003). Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study. Information Processing and Management, 39, 445-463.
57. Valentine, B. (2001). The legitimate effort in research papers: Student commitment versus faculty expectations. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 27, 107-115.
58. Van Styvendaele, J.H. (1977). University scientists as seekers of information: Sources of reference to periodical literature. Journal of Librarianship, 9, 270-277.
59. Vickery, B.C. (1965). On retrieval system theory. London: Butterworths. Wallace, R., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the web: Students online in a sixth-grade classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 75-104.
60. Wildemuth, B. (2004). The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 246-258.
61. Wildemuth, B., & Moore, M.E. (1995). End-user search behaviors and their relationship to search effectiveness. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 83, 294-304.
62. Wood, D.N., & Bower, C.A. (1969). The use of social science periodical literature. Journal of Documentation, 9, 108-122.