QoS-aware model driven architecture through the UML and CIM

Information Systems Frontiers

Volumn 9, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 209-224

  Chan, Kenneth ^a   Poernomo, Iman ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Instrumentation; Model driven architecture; Monitoring; QoS

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER HARDWARE; QUALITY OF SERVICE; SOFTWARE DESIGN; SOFTWARE PACKAGES; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

COMMON INFORMATION MODEL (CIM); DISTRIBUTED MANAGEMENT TASKFORCE (DMTF); INSTRUMENTATION; MODEL DRIVEN ARCHITECTURE (MDA); RUNTIME MONITORING;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 34250192193     PISSN: 13873326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-007-9033-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Brunner, M., & Keller, A. (eds). (2003). Efficient and transparent Instrumentation of application components using an aspect-oriented approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2867. Berlin: Springer.
2. Chan, K., Poernomo, I., Schmidt, H. W., & Jayaputera, J. (2005). A model-oriented framework for runtime monitoring of nonfunctional properties. In QoSA/SOQUA. LNCS, vol. 371.2 (pp. 38-52). Berlin: Springer.
3. Distributed Management Task Force Inc. (2006). Common Information Model (CIM) standard.
4. Frolund, S., & Koistinen, J. (1998). Quality-of-service specification in distributed object systems. Technical Report HPL-98-159, Software Technology Laboratory. Palo Alto, CA: Hewlett-Packard.
5. Garlan, D., Schmerl, B., & Chang, J. (2001). Using gauges for architecture-based monitoring and adaptation. In Working conference on complex and dynamic systems architecture Brisbane, Australia, 12-14 December, 2001. Australia: DSTC.
6. International Standards Organization (1998). ISO/IEC 13236:1998 information technology-Quality of service: Framework.
7. International Standards Organization (2001). ISO/IEC 9126 1-4:2001 information technology-Software product quality.
8. Jezequel, J. M., Defour, O., & Plouzeau, N. (2004). An MDA approach to tame component based software development. In Formal methods for components and objects, second international symposium, FMCO 2003, Leiden, The Netherlands, November 4-7, 2003, Revised Lectures. LNCS, vol. 3188 (p. 260).
9. Mavrides, A. (2006). .NET non-functional constraint processing. Master's thesis, King's College London. Available at http://palab.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/ publications/mavrides-2006a.pdf.
10. Medvidovic, N., & Taylor, R. N. (2000). A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE transactions on software engineering, 26(1), 70-93.
11. Merilinna, J. (2005). A tool for quality-driven architecture model transformation. PhD thesis, VTT Electronics, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Vuorimiehentie 5, P.O.Box 2000, FI-02044 VTT, Finland.
12. Mukerji, J., & Miller, J. (2003). MDA Guide Version 1.0.1. Object Management Group. Available at http://www.omg.org/docs/omg/03-06-01.pdf.
13. OMG (1999). UML profile for enterprise distributed object computing (') RFP. Technical report, Object Management Group. Available at ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/docs/ad/99-03-10.pdf.
14. OMG (2000). Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification. Object Management Group.
15. OMG (2003). UML Superstructure v2.0. Technical report, Object Management Group. Available at http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/2003-08-02.
16. OMG (2005). UML profile for modeling quality of service and fault tolerance characteristics and mechanisms. (2005).
17. Poernomo, I., Reussner, R., & Schmidt, H. (2003). Architectural configuration with edoc and .net component services. In. 29th EUROMICRO conference 2003, new waves in system architecture, 3-5 September 2003, Belek-Antdya, Turkey (pp. 61-69). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
18. Poernomo, I., Schmidt, H., & Jayaputera, J. (2005) Timed probabilistic constraints over the DMTF common information model. In The 9th IEEE international EDOC conference (EDOC 2005), 19-23 September 2005, Enschede, The Netherlands (pp. 261-273). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
19. Poernomo, I., Schmidt, H., & Jayaputera, J. (2006). Verification and prediction of timed probabilistic properties over the distributed management taskforce common information model. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 15(4), 633-658.
20. Solberg, A., Husa, K. E., Aagedal, J. O., & Abrahamsen, E. (2003). QoS-aware MDA (2003). In Electronic publication from model driven architecture in the specification, implementation and validation of object-oriented embedded systems (SIVOES-MDA'2003) in conjunction with UML'2003.
21. Wang, G., Wang, C., Chen, A., Wang, H., Fung, C., Uczekaj, S., et al. (2005). Service level management using qos monitoring, diagnostics, and adaptation for networked enterprise systems. In ninth IEEE international EDOC enterprise computing (pp. 239-247). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
22. Warmer, J., Bast, W., & Kleppe, A. (2003). The object constraint language: Getting your models ready for MDA. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
23. Warmer, J., Bast, W., Pinkley, D., Herrera, M., & Kleppe, A. (2003). MDA explained: The model driven architecture: practice and promise. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24. Yang, C., Bryant, B. R., Burt, C. C., Raje, R. R., Olson, A. M., & Auguston, M. (2003). Formal methods for quality of service analysis in component-based distributed computing. In 7th world conference on integrated design and process technology. Grandview, TX: Society for Design and Process Science (SDPS).