A sensitivity equation method for fast evaluation of nearby flows and uncertainty analysis for shape parameters

International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 497-512

  Duvigneau, R ^a   Pelletier, D ^b  

^a INRIA   (France)

^b ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Continuous sensitivity equation method; Fast evaluations of nearby flows; Sensitivity analysis; Uncertainty analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250187453     PISSN: 10618562     EISSN: 10290257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10618560600910059     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anderson, W.K. and Venkatakrishnan, V., Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation. Computers and Fluids, 1999, 28(4), 443-480.
2. Belhamadia, Y., Fortin, A. and Chamberland, E., Anisotropic mesh adaptation for the solution of the Stefan problem. J. Comp. Phys., 2004, 194(1), 233-255.
3. Beux, F. and Dervieux, A., A hierarchical approach for shape optimization. Rapport de Recherche INRIA, 1993, 1868.
4. Borggaard, J. and Verma, A., On efficient solutions to the continuous sensitivity equation using automatic differentiation. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 2001, 22(1), 39-62.
5. Duvigneau, R. and Pelletier, D., Evaluation of nearby flows by a shape sensitivity equation method. In 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2005. AIAA Paper 2005-0127.
6. Elliott, J. and Peraire, J., Practical 3D aerodynamic design and optimization using unstructured grids. AIAA Journal, 1997, 35(9), 1479-1485.
7. Giles, M.B., Duta, M.C., Muller, J.-D. and Pierce, N.A., Algorithm developments for discrete adjoint methods. AIAA Journal, 2003, 41(2), 198-205.
8. Jameson, A., Martinelli, L. and Pierce, N. A., Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equation. Theorical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 1998, 10, 213-237.
9. Martins, J.R.R.A., Kroo, I.M. and Alonso, J.J., An automated method for sensitivity analysis using complex variables. AIAA Paper 2000-0689, Proceedings of the 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2000, Reno, NV, USA.
10. Mohammadi, B. and Pironneau, O., Mesh adaptation and automatic differentiation in a CAD-free framework for optimal shape. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1999, 30(2), 127-136.
11. Pelletier, D., Adaptive finite element computations of complex flows. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids. 1999, 31, 189-202.
12. Pelletier, D. and Ilinca, F., Adaptive remeshing for the k-ε model of turbulence. AIAA J., 1997, 35(4), 640-646.
13. Pelletier, D. and Roache, P.J., CFD code verification and the method of manufactured solutions. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada, Windsor, ON, June 9-11 2001.
14. Pelletier, D., Turgeon, É., Etienne, S. and Borggaard, J., Reliable sensitivity analysis via an adaptative sensitivity equation method. In 3rd AIAA Theorical Fluid Mechanics Meeting, 2002, St Louis, MO, June 2002. AIAA Paper 2002-2758.
15. Peraire, J., Vahdati, M., Morgan, K. and Zienkiewicz, O.C., Adaptive remeshing for compressible flow computations. J. Comput. Phys., 1987, 72(2), 449-466.
16. Putko, M.M., Newman, P.A., Taylor, A.C. and Green, L.L., Approach for uncertainty propagation and robust design in cfd using sensitivity derivatives. In 15th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Anaheim, CA, June 2001. AIAA Paper 2001-2528.
17. Turgeon, É., Pelletier, D. and Borggaard, J., A continuous sensitivity equation approach to optimal design in mixed convection. Numer. Heat Trans., 2000, 38, 869-885.
18. Turgeon, É., Pelletier, D. and Borggaard, J., Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for variable property flows. In 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2001. AIAA Paper 2001-0139.
19. Zienkiewicz, O.C. and Zhu, J.Z., The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 1: the recovery technique. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 1992, 33, 1331-1364.
20. Zienkiewicz, O.C. and Zhu, J.Z., The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 2: error estimates and adaptivity. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 1992, 33, 1365-1382.