Ease of use of the Airway Scope vs the Bullard laryngoscope: A manikin study [1]

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 397-398

  Hirabayashi, Yoshihiro ^a  

^a JICHI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; HEAD POSITION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGOSCOPE; LARYNGOSCOPY; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; TONGUE EDEMA; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 34250177668     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03022664     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Wong DT, Lai K, Chung FF, Ho RY. Cannot intubate-cannot ventilate and difficult intubation strategies: results of a Canadian national survey. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1439-46.
2. Koyama J, Aoyama T, Kusano Y, et al. Description and first clinical application of AirWay Scope for tracheal intubation. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2006; 18: 247-50.