Day-case surgery patients' health-related quality of life

International Journal of Nursing Practice

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 121-129

  Suhonen, Riitta A ^a   Iivonen, Mauri K ^a   Välimäki Prof , Maritta A ^b  

^a Forssa Hospital   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Day case surgery; Health related quality of life; Nottingham Health Profile; Patient's view

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL PATHWAY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FINLAND; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK FACTOR; SLEEP DISORDER; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; WALKING DIFFICULTY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CRITICAL PATHWAYS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FINLAND; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MOBILITY LIMITATION; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT DISCHARGE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; SLEEP DISORDERS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 34250173848     PISSN: 13227114     EISSN: 1440172X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2007.00610.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Fuchs KH. Minimally invasive surgery. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 154-159.
2. STAKES 2005.Care Periods with Surgical Operations in 2004 and Trends of Day-Case Surgery 1997-2004. Statistics. Available from URL: http://www.stakes.info/2/9/2,9,1.aspfiles/pdf./Tilastotiedote2005/Tt26_05.pdf. Accessed 30 January 2006.
3. Punnonen H. Year 2004 at Finnish Hospitals. Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto, 2005.
4. NHS. National Health Service Management Executive. Day- Surgery: Making It Happen. A study conducted by NHS Value for Money Unit. London: HMSO, 1991.
5. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Memorandum of the National Project on Safeguarding the Future of Health Care Services. Working Group Memorandum 3, Helsinki, 2002.
6. Wealy AE, Ackrouy CE, Mani GV, Winson IG. Day-case or short-stay admission for arthroscopic knee surgery: A randomised controlled trial. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1998; 80: 146-149.
7. Takeda J. Day surgery and anaesthesia. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 2000; 101: 703-707.
8. Gough IR. Quality of life as an outcome variable in oncology and surgery. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 1994; 64: 227-235.
9. World Health Organization. Quality of Life Assessment: An Annotated Bibliography. WHO/MNH/PSF/94.1. Geneva: WHO, 1994.
10. Carditello A, Mule V, Milone A et al. One-day surgery: Results of 3000 surgical procedures. Il Giornale di Chirurgia 2001; 22: 269-272.
11. Kingsnorth AN, Bowley DMG, Porter C. A prospective study of 1000 hernias: Results of the Plymouth Hernia Service. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2003; 85: 18-22.
12. Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. British Journal of Surgery 2006; 93: 40-45.
13. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, Williams J. Reliability of a population survey tool for measuring perceived health problems: A study of patients with osteoarthritis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1981; 35: 297-300.
14. Waterman H, Leatherbarrow B, Slater R, Waterman C. Post-operative pain, nausea and vomiting: Qualitative perspectives from telephone interviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1999; 29: 690-696.
15. Fedorowicz Z, Lawrence D, Gutierrez P. Day care versus in-patient surgery for age-related cataract. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005; Issue 4. No.: CD004242. 10.1002/14651858.CD004242.pub3. Accessed 30 January 2006.
16. Percival SP, Setty SS. Prospective audit comparing ambulatory day surgery with inpatient surgery for treating cataracts. Quality in Health Care 1992; 1: 38-42.
17. Lawrence K, McWhinnie D, Jenkinson C, Coulter A. Quality of life in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1997; 79: 40-45.
18. Pedersen SH, Douville LM, Eberlein TJ. Accelerated surgical stay programs. A mechanism to reduce health care costs. Annals of Surgery 1994; 219: 374-381.
19. Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP, Backett EM, Pope C. Subjective health assessments and the perceived outcome of minor surgery. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 1984; 28: 105-114.
20. Rissanen P, Aro S, Sintonen H, Slätis P, Paavolainen P. Quality of life and functional ability in hip and knee replacements: A prospective study. Quality of Life Research 1996; 5: 56-64.
21. Jorn LP, Johansson R, Toksvig-Larsen S. Patient satisfaction, function and return to work after knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 1999; 70: 343-347.
22. Sjöland H, Wiklund I, Caidahl K, Hartford M, Karlsson T, Herlitz J. Improvement in quality of life differs between women and men after coronary artery bypass surgery. Journal of Internal Medicine 1999; 245: 445-454.
23. Vaile JH, Mathers DM, Ramos-Remus C, Russell AS. Generic health instruments do not comprehensively capture patient perceived improvement in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Rheumatology 1999; 26: 1163-1166.
24. Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Wilkin D. Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research 1993; 2: 369-395.
25. Kersten P, Mullee MA, Smith JA, McLellan L, George S. Generic health status measures are unsuitable for measuring health status in severely disabled people. Clinical Rehabilitation 1999; 13: 219-228.
26. Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Perceived health: Age and sex comparisons in a community. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1984a; 38: 156-160.
27. Niskanen M, Ruokonen E, Takala J, Rissanen P, Kari A. Quality of life after prolonged intensive care. Critical Care Medicine 1999; 27: 1132-1139.
28. Coll AM, Ameen JRM, Moseley LG. Reported pain after day surgery: A critical literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2004; 46: 53-65.
29. Barthelsson C, Lützen K, Anderberg B, Nordström G. Patients' experiences of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in day surgery. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2003; 12: 253-259.
30. Coll AM, Ameen J. Profiles of pain after day surgery: Patients' experiences of three different operation types. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2006; 53: 178-187.
31. Hopton JL, Porter AM, Howie JG. A measure of perceived health in evaluating general practice: The Nottingham Health Profile. Family Practice 1991; 8: 253-260.
32. Badia X, Roset M, Herdman M. Inconsistent responses in three preference-elicitation methods for health states. Social Science and Medicine 1999; 49: 943-950.
33. Dolan P, Kind P. Inconsistency and health state valuations. Social Science and Medicine 1996; 42: 609-615.
34. Grimby A, Wiklund I. Health-related quality of life in old age. A study among 76-year-old Swedish urban citizens. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine 1994; 22: 7-14.
35. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Government Resolution on the Health 2015 Public Health Programme. Publications 4. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, 2001.
36. OECD. Towards High-Performing Health Systems OECD Health Project. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD Publications 2. Paris: Publication Services, 2004.
37. Punnonen H. January-December 2001 at Finnish Hospitals. Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto, 2002.
38. Hunt S, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Backett EM, Williams J, Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: A validation study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1980; 34: 281-286.
39. Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna S. Measuring Health Status. London: Croom-Helm, 1986.
40. McKenna SP, Hunt SM, McEwen J. Weighting the seriousness of perceived health problems using Thurstone's method of paired comparisons. International Journal of Epidemiology 1981; 10: 93-97.
41. Visser ME, Fletcher AE, Parr G, Simpson A, Bulpitt CJ. A comparison of three quality of life instruments in subjects with angina pectoris: The Sickness Impact Profile, the Nottingham Health Profile, and the Quality of Well-being Scale. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1994; 47: 157-163.
42. Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Argyle M. The Nottingham Health Profile: An analysis of its sensitivity in differentiating illness groups. Social Science and Medicine 1988; 27: 1411-1414.
43. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
44. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000. Nursing Ethics 2002; 9: 105-109.
45. Koivukangas P, Koivukangas J, Ohinmaa A, Kivelä S-L, Krause K. NHP-A method for measuring health-related quality of life in health services evaluation. Journal of Social Medicine 1992; 29: 229-235.
46. Koivukangas P, Ohinmaa A, Koivukagas J. Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) the Finnish Version (Finnish). STAKES. National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health Report 187. Helsinki: Gummerus, 1995.
47. Nummenmaa T, Konttinen R, Kuusinen J, Leskinen E. Tutkimusaineiston analyysi. Porvoo, Finland: WSOY Kirjapainoyksikkö, 1997 (in Finnish).
48. Norusis MJ. SPSS 6.1 Guide to Data Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995.
49. Christenson R. Analysis of Variance, Design and Regression Applied Statistical Methods. London: Chapman & Hall, 1996.
50. Keulemans Y, Eshuis J, de Haes H, de Wit LT, Gouma DJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Day-care versus clinical observation. Annals of Surgery 1998; 228: 734-740.