Subjective and objective outcome following implantation of the apodized diffractive AcrySof ReSTOR;Subjektive und Objektive Ergebnisse nach Implantation der Apodisiert Diffraktiven AcrySof ReSTOR

Ophthalmologe

Volumn 104, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 399-408

  Petermeier, K ^a   Szurman, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Diffractive design; Halos; Mesopic visual acuitiy; Multifocal intraocular lens; Visual acuity for close work

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID; ACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EQUIPMENT; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONOCULAR VISION; OPTICS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS; VISUAL ACUITY;

ACRYLATES; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REFRACTION, OCULAR; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 34250172424     PISSN: 0941293X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00347-007-1511-3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Auffarth GU, Dick HB (2001) Multifokale Intraokularlinsen. Eine Überischt, Ophthalmologe 98: 127-137
2. Alió JL, Tavolato M, De la Hoz F et al. (2004) Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses: comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg 30: 2494-2503
3. Blaylock JF, Si Z, Vickers C (2006) Visual and refractive status at different focal distances after implantation of the ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 32: 1464-1473
4. Chiam PJ, Chan JH, Aggarwal RK et al. (2006) ReS-TOR intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: Quality of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 32: 1459-1463
5. Davison JA, Simpson MJ (2006) History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 32: 849-858
6. Dick HB, Krummenauer F, Schwenn O et al. (1999) Objective and subjective evaluation of photic phenomena after monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 106: 1878-1886
7. Eisenmann D, Jacobi FK, Dick B et al. (1996) Untersuchungen zur Blendempfindlichkeit phaker und pseudophaker Augen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 208: 87-92
8. Hayashi K, Hayashi H (2004) Stereopsis in bilaterally pseudophakic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 30: 1466-1470
9. Hayashi K, Hayashi H (2005) Reply: Stereopsis in bilaterally pseudophakic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 31: 2038
10. Holzer MP, Rabsilber TM, Auffarth GU (2006) Presbyopiekorrektur mittels Intraokularlinsen. Ophthalmologe 103: 661-666
11. Hunkeler JD, Coffrnan TM, Paugh J et al. (2002) Characterization of visual phenomena with the array multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 28: 1195-1204
12. Javitt JC, Steinert RF (2000) Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: a multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Ophthalmology 107: 2040-2048
13. Können T, Allen D, Boureau C et al. (2006) European multicenter study of the AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 113: 584; el. Epub 2006 Feb 14
14. Lane SS, Morris M, Nordan L et al. (2006) Multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 19: 89-105
15. Leccisotti A (2004) Secondary procedures after presbyopic lens exchange. J Cataract Refract Surg 30: 1461-1465
16. Lee ES, Lee SY, Jeong SY et al. (2005) Effect of post-operative refractive error on visual acuity and patient satisfaction after implantation of the array multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 31: 1960-1965
17. Leyland M, Zinicola E (2003) Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review. Ophthalmology 110: 1789-1798
18. Liekfeld A, Schwarz EC, Waffenschmidt E et al. (2002) Beeinflusst die Linsenart die stereoskopische Wahrnehmung? Ophthalmologe 99: 20-24
19. Mester U, Dillinger P, Antersit N (2003) Impact of a modified optical design on visual function: Clinical comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 29: 652-660
20. Mester U, Dillinger P, Anterist N et al. (2005) Funktionelle Ergebnisse nach Implantation multifokaler Intraokularlinsen (MIOL). Array SA40 versus Acri. Twin. Ophthalmologe 102: 1051-1056
21. Montes-Micó R, Alió JL (2003) Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29: 703-711
22. Pieh S, Lackner B, Hanselmayer G et al. (2001) Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 85: 816-821
23. Rocha KM, Chalita MR, Souza CE et al. (2005) Post-operative wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity of a multifocal apodized diffractive IOL (ReS-TOR) and three monofocal IOLs. J Refract Surg 21: 808-812
24. Schmitz S, Dick HB, Krummenauer F et al. (2000) Contrast Sensitivity and glare disybility by halogen light after monofocal and multifocal lens implantation. Br J Ophthalmol 84: 1109-1112
25. Souza CE, Gerente VM, Chalita MR et al. (2006) Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, reading speed, and wavefront analysis: pseudophakic eye with multi-focal IOL (ReSTOR) versus fellow phakic eye in non-presbyopic patients. J Refract Surg 22: 303-305
26. Steinert RF, Aker BL, Trentacost DJ et al. (1999) A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 106: 1243-1255
27. Tsorbatzoglou A, Nemeth G, Math J et al. (2006) Pseudophakic accommodation and pseudoac-commodation under physiological conditions measured with partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 32: 1345-1350