Objects and motives in a product design process

Mind, Culture, and Activity

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 19-36

  Hyysalo, Sampsa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250171997     PISSN: 10749039     EISSN: 15327884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Beiser, F. (1999). The context and problematic of post-Kantian philosophy. In S. Chritchley&W.R. Scröder (Eds.), A companion to continental philosophy (pp. 21-35). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
2. Carlisle, Y.,&Dean, A. (1999). Design as knowledge integration capability. Creativity and Innovation Management, 8(2), 112-121
3. Christiansen, E. (1996). Tamed by a rose: Computers as tools in human activity. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human computer interaction (pp. 147-175). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
4. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy
5. Engeström, Y. (1990). Constructing the object in the work activity of primary care physicians. In Y. Engestrom (Ed.), Learning, working, imagining. Twelve studies in activity theory (pp. 107-130). Helsinki, Finland: Orienta Consulting
6. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 18-38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
7. Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960-974
8. Engeström, Y., & Escalante, V. (1996). Mundane tool or object of affection? The rise and fall of the Postal Buddy. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human computer interaction (pp. 325-374). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
9. Fleck, J. (1994). Learning by trying: The implementation of configurational technology. Research Policy, 23, 637-652
10. Foot, K. (2002). Catching an evolving object. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9, 132-149
11. Gregory, J. (2000). Sorcerer's apprentice: Creating the electronic health record, re-inventing medical records and patient care. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego
12. Hasu, M. (2001). Critical transition From developers to users. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki
13. Hegel, G. F. W. (1970). Phenomenology of spirit. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
14. Holland, D., & Reeves, J. R. (1996). Activity theory and a view from somewhere: Team perspectives on the intellectual work of programming. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness. activity theory and human computer interaction(pp. 257-282). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
15. Houlgate, S. (1999). Hegel. In S. Chritchley&W. R. Scröder (Eds.), A companion to continental philosophy (pp. 93-107). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
16. Hyysalo, S. (2004). Uses of innovation. Wristcare in the practices of engineers and elderly. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki
17. Ilyenkov, E. (1977). Dialectical logic. Essays on its theory and practice. Moscow: Progress
18. Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Computer-mediated activity: Functional organs in social and developmental contexts. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness. Activity theory and human computer interaction (pp. 45-67). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
19. Kozulin, A. (1990). Vygotsky's psychology. A biography of ideas. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf
20. Law, J. (1991). A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination. London: Routledge
21. Law, J.,&Bijker, W. E. (Eds.). (1992). Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
22. Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press
23. Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Moscow: Progress
24. Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Problems of development of mind. Moscow: Progress
25. Marx, K. (1984). Theses on Feuerbach. In L. S. Feuer (Ed.), K. Marx&F. Engels: Basic writings on politics and philosophy(pp. 283-286). London: Fontana
26. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1959). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House
27. Miettinen, R. (1998). Object construction and networks in research work: The case of research on cellulose-degrading enzymes. Social Studies of Science, 28(3), 423-463
28. Mutanen, U.-M. (2002, June). From new products to new practices: An activity theoretical perspective to the transformation of product development work. Paper presented at the International Conference for Sociocultural Research and Activity Theory, The Netherlands, Amsterdam
29. Nardi, B. (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
30. Rip, A., Misa, T. J., & Schot, J. (1995). Managing technology in society: The approach of constructive technology assessment. London: Pinter Publishers
31. Saari, E. (2003). The pulse of change in research work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki
32. Saari, E., & Miettinen, R. (2001). Dynamics of change in research work: constructing a new research area in a research group. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 26(3), 300-321
33. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
34. Vygotsky, L. (1989). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
35. Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research policy, 25, 865- 899
36. Zaff, B. S., McNeese, M. D.,&Snyder, D. E. (1993). Capturing multiple perspectives:Auser- centered approach to knowledge and design acquisition. Knowledge Acquisition, 5, 79-116