Online argument between Israeli Jews and Palestinians

Human Communication Research

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 291-309

  Ellis, Donald G ^a   Maoz, Ifat ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD   (United States)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250168358     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00300.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alderton, S. M. Frey, L. R 1983). Effects of reactions to arguments on group outcome: The case of group polarization. Central States Speech Journal, 34, 88 95.
2. Brashers, D. E., Adkins, M. Meyers, R. A 1994). Argumentation in computer-mediated decision groups. In L. Frey (Ed Communication in context: Studies of naturalistic groups (pp. 262 283). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Brossmann, B. G. Canary, D. J 1990). An observational analysis of argument structures: The case of nightline. Argumentation, 4, 199 212.
4. Canary, D. J 1989). Manual for coding conversational argument. Unpublished manuscript, Pennsylvania State University.
5. Canary, D. J., Brossmann, B. G. Seibold, D. R 1987). Argument structures in decision-making groups. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 53, 16 37.
6. Canary, D. J., Brossmann, J. E., Brossmann, B. G. Weger, H 1995). Toward a theory of minimally rational argument: Analyses of episode-specific effects of argument structures. Communication Monographs, 62, 183 212.
7. Canary, D. J., Weger, H. Stafford, L 1991). Couples' argument sequences and their associations with relational characteristics. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55, 159 179.
8. DeSanctis, G. Poole, M. S 1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organizational Science, 5, 121 147.
9. Ellis, D. G. Maoz, I 2002). Cross-cultural argument interactions between Israeli-Jews and Palestinians. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 181 194.
10. Hubbard, A. S 1997). Face to face at arm's length: Conflict norms and extra-group relations in grassroots dialogue groups. Human Organizations, 56, 265 274.
11. Jackson, S. Jacobs, S 1980). Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 66, 251 265.
12. Johnstone, B 1986). Arguments with Khomeini: Rhetorical situation and persuasive style in cross-cultural perspective. Text, 6, 171 187.
13. Katriel, T 1986). Talking straight: Dugri speech in Israeli sabra culture. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
14. Kuhn, D 1991). The skills of argument. New York : Cambridge University Press.
15. Lea, M. Spears, R 1991). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283 301.
16. Lemus, D. R., Seibold, D. R., Flanagin, A. J. Metzger, J. J 2004). Argument in computer-mediated groups. Journal of Communication, 54, 302 320.
17. Limon, M. S. Boster, F. J 2001). The impact of varying argument quality and minority size on influencing the majority and perceptions of the minority. Communication Quarterly, 49, 350 365.
18. Maoz, I 2000a). Multiple conflicts and competing agendas: A framework for conceptualizing structured encounters between groups in conflict - The case of a coexistence project of Jews and Palestinians in Israel. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 6, 135 156.
19. Maoz, I 2000b). An experiment in peace: Reconciliation-aimed workshops of Jewish-Israeli and Palestinian youth. Journal of peace Research, 37, 7212 736.
20. Maoz, I. Ellis, D. G 2001). Going to ground: Argument in Israeli-Jewish and Palestinian encounter groups. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34, 399 419.
21. Maoz, I. Ellis, D. G 2006). Facilitating groups in severe conflict: The case of transformational dialogue between Israeli-Jews and Palestinians. In L. Frey (Ed Facilitating group communication in context: Innovations and Applications with natural groups (pp. 183 203). Cresskill, NJ : Hampton Press.
22. McNamee, S. Gergen, K 1999). Relational responsibility. In S. McNamee K. Gergen et al Eds Relational responsibility: Resources for sustainable dialogue (pp. 3 48). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
23. Meyers, R. A 1997). Social influence and argumentation. In L. R. Frey J. K. Barge (Eds Managing group life: Communication in decision-making groups (pp. 183 201). Boston : Houghton-Mifflin.
24. Meyers, R. A. Brashers, D. E 1995). Multi-stage versus single-stage coding of small group argument: A preliminary comparative assessment. In S. Jackson (Ed Argumentation and values: Proceedings of the ninth SCA? AFA conference on argumentation (pp. 93 100). Annandale, VA : Speech Communication Association.
25. Meyers, R. A., Brashers, D. E. Hanner, J 2000). Majority/minority influence: Identifying argumentative patterns and predicting argument-outcome links. Journal of Communication, 50, 3 30.
26. Moscovici, S 1985). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindzey E. Aronson (Eds The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 347 412). New York : Academic Press.
27. Pearce, W. B. Littlejohn, S. W 1997). Moral conflict: When social worlds collide. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.
28. Semic, B. A. Canary, D. J 1997). Trait argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and minimally rational argument: An observational analysis of friendship discussions. Communication Quarterly, 45, 355 378.
29. Spears, R. Lea, M 1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427 459.
30. Walther, J. B 1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52 90.
31. Walther, J. B 1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23, 342 369.
32. Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L. Hightower, R 1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28, 975 992.