Corneal flap thickness with the Moria M2 single-use head 90 microkeratome

Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 401-406

  Huhtala, Anne ^a,b   Pietilä, Juhani ^a,b   Mäkinen, Petri ^a,b   Suominen, Sakari ^a,b   Seppänen, Matti ^a,b   Uusitalo, Hannu ^b,c  

^a Mehilainen Oy   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Corneal flap thickness; Laser assisted in situ keratomileusis; LASIK; Microkeratome; Singleuse

Indexed keywords

IRON;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; ECHOOCULOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HYPERMETROPIA; KERATOMETRY; KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MYOPIA; PEROPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALPEL; TISSUE FLAP;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CORNEAL STROMA; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; HUMANS; HYPEROPIA; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGICAL FLAPS;

EID: 34250167179     PISSN: 13953907     EISSN: 16000420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00838.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ambrosio R, Jr. & Wilson SE (2001): Complications of laser in situ keratomileusis: Etiology, prevention, and treatment. J Refract Surg 17: 350-379.
2. Arbelaez MC (2002): Nidek MK 2000 microkeratome clinical evaluation. J Refract Surg 18: 357-360.
3. Duffey RJ & Leaming D (2003): US trends in refractive surgery: 2002 ISRS Survey. J Refract Surg 19: 357-363.
4. Duffey RJ & Leaming D (2005): US trends in refractive surgery: 2003 ISRS/AAO survey. J Refract Surg 21: 87-91.
5. Flanagan GW & Binder PS (2003): Precision of flap measurements for laser in situ keratomileusis in 4428 eyes. J Refract Surg 19: 113-123.
6. Gailitis RP & Lagzdins M (2002): Factors that affect corneal flap thickness with the Hansatome microkeratome. J Refract Surg 18: 439-443.
7. Gimbel HV, Penno EE, van Westenbrugge JA, Ferensowicz M & Furlong MT (1998): Incidence and management of intraoperative and early postoperative complications in 1000 consecutive laser in situ keratomileusis cases. Ophthalmology 105: 1839-1847.
8. Jackson DW, Wang L & Koch DD (2003): Accuracy and precision of the Amadeus microkeratome in producing LASIK flaps. Cornea 22: 504-507.
9. Jacobs JM & Taravella MJ (2002): Incidence of intraoperative flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 28: 23-28.
10. PietiläJ, Mäkinen P, Suominen S, Huhtala A & Uusitalo H (2005): Corneal flap measurements in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Moria M2 automated microkeratome. J Refract Surg 21: 377-385.
11. PietiläJ, Mäkinen P, Suominen S, Huhtala A & Uusitalo H (2006): Bilateral comparison of corneal flap dimensions with the Moria M2 reusable head and single-use head microkeratomes. J Refract Surg 22: 354-357.
12. Shemesh G, Dotan G & Lipshitz I (2002): Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using three different microkeratomes. J Refract Surg 18: S347-S351.
13. Shemesh G, Leibovitch I & Lipshitz I (2004): Comparison of corneal flap thickness between primary and fellow eyes using three microkeratomes. J Refract Surg 20: 417-421.
14. Spadea L, Cerrone L, Necozione S & Balestrazzi E (2002): Flap measurements with the Hansatome microkeratome. J Refract Surg 18: 149-154.
15. Tham VM & Maloney RK (2000): Microkeratome complications of laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 107: 920-924.
16. Wilson SE (1998): LASIK: management of common complications. Laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 17: 459-467.