Joint level-set shape modeling and appearance modeling for brain structure segmentation

NeuroImage

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 672-683

  Hu, Shiyan ^a   Collins, D Louis ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; CEREBRAL VENTRICLES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 34250165727     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.048     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Borgefors G. Another comment on a note on 'distance transformation in digital images'. CVGIP, Image Underst. 54 (1991) 301-306
2. Chan T., and Vese L. Active contour without edges. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 10 2 (2001) 266-277
3. Collins D., Neelin P., Peters T., and Evans A. Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 18 2 (1994) 192-205
4. Cootes, T.F., Taylor, C.J., 2004. Statistical models of appearance for computer vision. Technical report, University of Manchester, Wolfson Image Analysis Unit, Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom. Electronic version: http://www.isbe.man.ac.uk.
5. Cootes T., Cooper D., Taylor C., and Graham J. Active shape models-Their training and application. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 61 1 (1995) 38-59
6. Cootes T., Edward G., and Taylor C. Active appearance model. Proc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis. 2 (1998) 484-498
7. Cremers D., Tischhauser F., Weickert J., and Schnorr C. Diffusion snakes: introducing statistical shape knowledge into the Mumford-Shah functional. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 50 3 (2002) 295-313
8. Dice L. Measures of the amount of ecological association between species. Ecology 26 3 (1945) 297-302
9. Haykin S. Adaptive Filters Theory (1986), Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA
10. Kamber M., Shinghal R., Collins D.L., Francis G., and Evans A.C. Model-based 3D segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in magnetic resonance brain images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 14 3 (1995) 442-453
11. Leventon M., Grimson E., and Faugeras O. Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. 1 (2000) 316-323
12. Osher S., and Sethian J. Fronts propagation with curvature dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J. Comput. Phys. 79 (1988) 12-49
13. Pal N.R., and Pal S.K. A review in image segmentation techniques. Pattern Recogn. 26 9 (1993) 1277-1294
14. Paragios N., and Deriche R. Geodesic active regions and level set methods for supervised texture segmentation. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 46 3 (2002) 223-247
15. Rao, R.L. (1995). Multiresolution techniques in image processing. PhD thesis, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Dept. Comp. Sci.
16. Rousson, M. (2004). Segmentation Incorporating Different Cues and Curve Evolution on Smooth Manifolds, PhD thesis, INRIA, Odyss ́ee lab.
17. Sled J., Zijdenbos A., and Evans A. A nonparametric method of automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 17 1 (1998) 87-97
18. Tsai A., Yezzi A., Wells J.W., Tempany C., Tucher S., A. Fan W.E.G., and Willsky A. A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 22 2 (2003) 137-154
19. Yang J., and Duncan J. 3D image segmentation of deformable objects with joint shape-intensity prior models using level sets. Med. Image Anal. 8 (2004) 285-294