Simulated strong ground motions for the great M 9.3 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 26 December 2004

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 97, Issue 1 A SUPPL., 2007, Pages

  Sorensen M B ^a,c   Atakan, Kuvvet ^a   Pulido, Nelson ^b  

^a Department of Earth Science ^*  (Norway)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR EARTH SCIENCE AND DISASTER PREVENTION   (Japan)

^c GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STOCHASTIC MODELS; TECTONICS; TSUNAMIS;

GROUND MOTIONS; GROUND SHAKING; STRIKE-SLIP FAULTING;

SEISMOLOGY;

AUSTRALIAN PLATE; BEDROCK; FAULT PLANE; GROUND MOTION; INDIAN PLATE; MICROPLATE; PARTITIONING; SLAB; STRIKE-SLIP FAULT; STRONG MOTION; SUBDUCTION; SUMATRA EARTHQUAKE 2004; THRUST FAULT; TSUNAMI;

ANDAMANS; ANDAMANS AND NICOBARS; ASIA; EURASIA; GREATER SUNDA ISLANDS; INDIA; INDIAN OCEAN; INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS; MALAY ARCHIPELAGO; SOUTH ASIA; SOUTHEAST ASIA; SUMATRA; SUNDA ISLES;

EID: 34249988196     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120050608     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ammon, C. J., C. Ji, H-K. Thio, D. Robinson, S. Ni, V. Hjorleifsdottir, H. Kanamori, T. Lay, S. Das, D. Helmberger, G. Ichinose, J. Polet, and D. Wald (2005). Rupture process of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, Science 308, 1133-1139.
2. Atkinson, G. M., and D. M. Boore (1995). Ground motion relations for eastern North America, Bull, Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 17-30.
3. Banghar, A. R. (1987). Seismo-tectonics of the Andaman-Nicobar islands, Tectonophysics 133, 97-107.
4. Bilham, R. (2005). A flying start, then a slow slip, Science 308, 1126-1127.
5. Boore, D. M. (2003). Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method, Pure Applied Geophysics 160, 635-676.
6. Boore, D. M., W. Joyner, and T. Fumal (1997). Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak accelerations from western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent works, Seism: Res. Lett. 68, 128-153.
7. Bouchon, M. (1981). A simple method to calculate Green's functions for elastic layered media, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 71, 959-971.
8. Brune, J. (1970). Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 4997-5009.
9. Campbell, K. (1997). Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra, Seism. Res. Lett. 68, 154-179.
10. Das, S., and B. V. Kostrov (1986). Fracture of a single asperity on a finite fault: a model for weak earthquakes? in S. Das, J. Boatwright, and C. Scholz (Editors), Earthquake Source Mechanism, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. 91-96.
11. Eguchi, T., S. Uyeda, and T. Maki (1979). Seismotectonics of the Andaman Sea, Tectonophysics 57, 35-51.
12. Glimsdal, S., G. K. Pedersen, K. Atakan, C. Harbitz, and H. P. Langtangen (2006). Propagation of the Dec. 26, 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami: effects of dispersion and source characteristics, J. Fluid Mech. Res. 33, no. 1, 15-43.
13. Global Centroid Moment Tensor (CMT) Project catalog search, www.globalcmt.org/CMTsearch.html (last accessed November 2006).
14. Honda, R., Y. Takahashi, M. H. Pradono, and R. Kurniawan (2005). Earthquake damage survey and observed intensities during the 2004 Sumatra earthquake www.catfish.dpri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~honda/aceh2004/ (in Japanese) (last accessed May 2006).
15. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOQ), International Hydrographic Organisation (IHO), and British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC) (2003). Centenary Edition of the GEBCO Digital Atlas, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and the International Hydrographic Organization as part of the General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans, British Oceanographic Data Centre, Liverpool, U.K. (CD-ROM).
16. Irikura, K. (1986). Prediction of strong acceleration motion using empirical Green's function, Proc. 7th Japan. Earthq. Eng. Symp., 151-156.
17. Ishida, M., S. Maruyama, D. Suetsugu, S. Matsuzaka, and T. Egucbi (1999). Superplume project: towards a new view of whole earth dynamics, Earth Planets Space 51, no. 1, 1-5.
18. Ji, C. (2005). Preliminary rupture model of the December 26, 2005 Sumatra earthquake, http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2004/eq_941226/ nei_slav_ff.html (last accessed January 2006).
19. Khan, S. A., and Ó. Gudmundsson (2005). GPS Analyses of the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, EOS 88, 89.
20. Lay, T., H. Kanamori, C. Ammon, M. Nettles, S. N. Ward, R. C. Aster, S. L. Beck, S. L. Bilek, M. R. Brudzinski, R. Butler, H. R. DeShon, G. Ekström, K. Satake, and S. Sipkin (2005). The great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of December 26, 2004, Science 308, 1127-1133.
21. Masturyono, R. McCaffrey, D. A. Wark, S. W. Roecker, Fauzi, G. Ibrahim, and Sukhyar (2001). Distribution of magma beneath the Toba caldera complex, north Sumatra, Insonesia, constrained by three-dimensional P wave velocities, seismicity, and gravity data, Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 2, 2000GC000096.
22. McCaffrey, R., P. C. Zwick, Y. Bock, L. Prawiradirdjo, J. F. Genrich, C. W. Stevens, S.S.O. Puntodewo, and C. Subarya (2000). Strain partitioning during oblique plate convergence in northern Sumatra: geodetic and seismologic constraints and numerical modeling. J. Geophys. Res. 105, no. B12, 28,363-28,376.
23. McCloskey, J., S. S. Nalbant, and S. Stacy (2005). Earthquake risk from co-seismic stress, Nature 434, 291.
24. McCloskey, J., S. S. Nalbant, S. Stacey, and A. Antoniolli (2006). Updated Earthquake Hazard in Sumatra, EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 2006, abstract no. EGU06-A-10222.
25. Midorikawa, S. (1993). Preliminary analysis for attenuation of peak ground velocity an stiff site, in Proc. International Workshop on Strong Motion Data, Menlo Park, California, 13-17 December, vol. 2, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California, pp. 39.48.
26. Murphy, J. R., and L. J. O'Brien (1977). The correlation of peak ground acceleration amplitude with seismic intensity and other physical parameters, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 67, 877-915.
27. Newmark, N. M., and W. J. Hall (1982). Earthquake Spectra and Design, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California, 103 pp.
28. Ortiz, M., and R. Bilham (2003). Source are and rupture parameters of the 31 December 1881 Mw = 7.9 Car Nicobar earthquake estimated from tsunamis recorded in the Bay of Bengal, J. Geophys. Res. 108, no. B4, 2215-2229.
29. Park, J., K. Anderson, R. Aster, R. Butler, T. Lay, and D. Simpson (2005). Global Seismographic Network records the great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, EOS 86, no. 6, 57-64.
30. Petersen, M. D., J. Dewey, S. Hartzell, C. Mueller, S. Harmsen, A. D. Frankel, and K. Rukstales (2004). Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Sumatra, Indonesia and across the Southern Malaysian Peninsula, Tectonophysics 390, 141-158.
31. Prawirodirdjo, L., Y. Bock, R. McCaffrey, J. Genrich, E. Calais, C. Stevens, S. S. O. Puntodewo, C. Subarya, J. Rais, P. Zwick, and P. Fauzi (1997). Geodetic observations of interseismic strain segmentation at the Sumatra subduction zone, Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, no. 21, 2601-2604.
32. Pulido, N., and T. Kubo (2004). Near-fault strong motion complexity of the 2000 Tottori earthquake (Japan) from a broadband source asperity model, Tectonophysics 390, 177-192.
33. Pulido, N., A. Ojeda, K. Atakan, and T. Kubo (2004). Strong ground motion estimation in the Marmara Sea region (Turkey) based on a scenario earthquake, Tectonophysics 391, 357-374.
34. Si, H., and S. Midorikawa (2000). New attenuation relations for peak ground acceleration and velocity considering effects of fault type and site conditions, in Proc. Twelfth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 30 January-4 February 2000, paper no. 0532.
35. Simoes, M., J. P. Avouac, R. Cattin, and P. Henry (2004). The Sumatra subduction zone: a case for a locked fault zone extending into mantle, J. Geophys. Res. 109, no. B 10402, 16 pp.
36. Singh, S. K., R. S. Dattatrayam, G. Suresh, A. Iglesias, B. K. Bansal, X. Peres, M. Ordaz, H. K. Gupta, P. R. Baidya, J. L. Gautam, G. Kumar, and R. K. Singh (2005). The Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake of 2004: regional broadband seismograms from India, Seism. Res. Lett. 76, no. 6, 684-692.
37. Sørensen, M. B., I. Oprsal, S. Bonnefoy-Claudet, K. Atakan, P. M. Mai, N. Pulido, and C. Yalciner (2006). Local site effects in Ataköy, Istanbul, Turkey, due to a future large earthquake in the Marmara Sea, Geophys. J. Int. (in press).
38. Stein, S., and E. A. Okal (2005). Speed and size of the Sumatra earthquake, Nature 434, 581-582.
39. Wald, D. J., V. Quitoriano, T. H. Heaton, and H. Kanamori (1999). Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity and modified Mercalli intensity in California, Earthquake Spectra 15, 557-564.
40. Wessel, P., and W. H. F. Smith (1998). New improved version of Generic Mapping Tools released, EOS 79, 579.
41. Yagi, Y. (2004). Preliminary results of rupture process for 2004 off coast of Northern Sumatra giant earthquake, http://iisee.kenken.go.jp/ staff/yagi/eq/Sumatra2004/Sumatra2004.html (last accessed May 2006).
42. Yamanaka, Y. (2005). Source rupture process of the Dec. 26, 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, EIC Seismological Note No. 161, ERI, University of Tokyo, Japan, available at www.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp/sanchu/ Seismo_Note/2004/EIC161e.html (last accessed January 2006).
43. Youngs, R. R., S.-J. Chiou, W. J. Silva, and J. R. Humphrey (1997). Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes, Seism. Res. Lett. 68, no. 1, 58-73.