How fast should nanotechnology advance? [1]

Nature Nanotechnology

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 327-

  Wintle, Bonnie ^a   Burgman, Mark ^a   Fidler, Fiona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NANOTECHNOLOGY;

NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;

COGNITIVE DEFECT; LETTER; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NUCLEAR ENERGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCIENTIST; TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PUBLIC OPINION; RISK FACTOR;

NANOMATERIAL;

HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PUBLIC OPINION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 34249946759     PISSN: 17483387     EISSN: 17483395     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2007.163a     Document Type: Letter

References (9)

1. Currall, S. C., King, E. B., Lane, N., Madera, J. & Turner, S. Nature Nanotech. 1, 153-155 (2006).
2. Renn, O., Burns, W. J., Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E. & Slovic, P. J. Soc. Issues. 48, 137-160 (1992).
3. Kunreuther, H. & Slovic, P. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 545, 8-13 (1996).
4. Slovic, P. Risk Anal. 19, 689-701 (1999).
5. Robins, R. Public Underst. Sci. 10, 19-36 (2001).
6. Wynne, B. Community Genet. 9, 211-220 (2006).
7. Siegrist, M., Wiek, A., Helland, A. & Kastenholz, H. Nature Nanotech. 2, 67 (2007).
8. Lemley, M. A. Stanford Law Rev. 58, 601-630 (2005).
9. Renn, O. & Roco, M. C. J. Nanopart. Res. 8, 153-191 (2006).