Cognitive predictors of improvements in adults' spoken word recognition six months after cochlear implant activation

Audiology and Neurotology

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 254-264

  Heydebrand, Gitry ^a   Hale, Sandra ^b   Potts, Lisa ^a   Gotter, Brenda ^a   Skinner, Margaret ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Cognition, cochlear implant; Spoken word recognition, adults

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; LIP READING; MALE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; VERBAL MEMORY; WECHSLER INTELLIGENCE SCALE; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COGNITION; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL LEARNING; WECHSLER SCALES;

EID: 34249946088     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: 14219700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000101473     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Battig WF, Montague WE: Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories: a replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. J Exp Psychol Monogr 1969;80:1-46.
2. Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F: Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurotol 1996;1:293-306.
3. Davis H, Silverman SR: Hearing and Deafness, ed 4 (Central Institute for the Deaf sentence lists). Baltimore, Holt, Rhinehart & Winston, 1978, pp 537-538.
4. Dawson PW, Blamey PJ, Rowland LC, Dettman SJ, Clark GM, Busby PA, Brown AM, Dowell RC, Rickards FW: Cochlear implants in children, adolescents and prelinguistically deafened adults:speech perception. J Speech Hear Res 1992;35:401-417.
5. Delis DC, Kaplan E, Kramer JH, Ober BA: California Verbal Learning Test. San Antonio, Psychological Corporation, 2000.
6. Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Abbas PJ, Knutson JF, Tyler RS: Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102:909-916.
7. Geier L, Barker M, Fisher L, Opie J: The effect of long-term deafness on speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult CLARION cochlear implant users. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;177:80-83.
8. Hallgren M, Larsby B, Lyxell B, Arlinger S: Cognitive effects in dichotic speech testing in elderly persons. Ear Hear 2001;22:120-129.
9. Hamzavi J, Baumgartner WD, Pok SM, Franz P, Gstottner W: Variables affecting speech perception in postlingually deaf adults following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 2003;123:493-498.
10. Humes L: Do 'auditory processing' tests measure auditory processing in the elderly? Ear Hear 2005;26:109-119.
11. Jenkins L, Myerson J, Joerding J, Hale S: Converging evidence that visuospatial cognition is more age-sensitive than verbal cognition. Psychol Aging 2000;15:157-175.
12. Jerger J, Chmiel R, Allen J, Wilson A: Effects of age and gender on dichotic sentence identification. Ear Hear 1994;15:274-286.
13. Jerger J, Jerger S, Pirozzolo F: Correlational analysis of speech audiometric scores, hearing loss, age and cognitive abilities in the elderly. Ear Hear 1989;12:103-109.
14. Kaplan DM, Shipp DB, Chen JM, Ng AH, Nedzelski JM: Early-deafened adult cochlear implant users:assessment of outcomes. J Otolaryngol 2003;32:245-249.
15. Knutson JF, Hinrichs JV, Tuler RS, Gantz BJ, Schartz HA, Woodworth G: Psychological predictors of audiological outcomes of multichannel implant:preliminary findings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100:817-822.
16. Kropp P, Niederberger U, Gerber WD: Zur Vorhersage von Sprach- und Zahlenverständnis bei Patienten mit Cochlear-Implantat. Laryngorhinootologie 2000;79:388-391.
17. Loeb GE, Kessler DK: Speech recognition performance over time with the Clarion cochlear prosthesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995;104:290-292.
18. Lyxell B, Andersson J, Arlinger S, Bredberg G, Harder H, Ronnberg J: Verbal information processing capabilities and cochlear implants: implications for preoperative capabilities of speech understanding. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 1996;1:190-203.
19. Massaro DW: Perceiving Talking Faces. From Speech Perception to a Behavioral Principle. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1998.
20. Naito Y, Tateya I, Fujiki N, Hirano S, Ishizu K, Nagahama Y, Fukuyama H, Kojima H: Increased cortical activation during hearing of speech in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2000;143:139-146.
21. Nilsson M, Soli S, Sullivan JA: Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;95:1085-1099.
22. Oh SH, Kim CS, Kang EJ, Lee DS, Lee HJ, Chang SO, Ahn SH, Hwang CH, Park HJ, Koo JW: Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4-year time period. Acta Otolaryngol 2003;123:148-153.
23. Peterson GE, Lehiste I: Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord 1962;27:62-70.
24. Pisoni DB: Cognitive factors and cochlear implants: some thoughts on perception, learning and memory in speech perception. Ear Hear 2000;21:70-78.
25. Pisoni DB, Cleary M: Learning, memory, and cognitive processes in deaf children following cochlear implantation;in Zeng F, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds): Cochlear Implants. Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing. New York, Springer, 2004, pp 377-426.
26. Pisoni DB, Cleary M, Geers AE, Tobey EA: Individual differences in effectiveness of cochlear implants in children who are prelingually deaf:new process measures of performance. Volta Rev 1999;101:111-164.
27. Pisoni DB, Geers A: Working memory in deaf children with cochlear implants: correlations between digit span and measures of spoken language processing. 7th Symp Cochlear Implants in Children, Iowa City, June 1998.
28. Psychological Corporation: WAIS-III - WMSIII Technical Manual. San Antonio, Harcourt Brace and Company, 1997.
29. Sarant JZ, Cowan NL, Blamey PJ: Cochlear implants for congenitally deaf adolescents: is open-set speech perception a realistic expectation? Ear Hear 1994;15:400-403.
30. Schramm D, Fitzpatrick E, Seguin C: Cochlear implantation for adolescents and adults with prelinguistic deafness. Otol Neurol 2002;23:698-703.
31. Shea JJ, Domico EH, Orchik DJ: Speech recognition ability as a function of duration of deafness in multichannel cochlear implant patients. Laryngoscope 1990;100:223-226.
32. Shepard RN, Cooper LA: Mental Images and Their Transformations. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1986.
33. Skinner MW, Arndt PL, Staller SJ: Nucleus 24 Advanced Encoder conversion study: performance versus preference. Ear Hear 2002;23:S-17S.
34. Skinner MW, Binzer SM, Fears BT, et al: Study of the performance of four prelinguistically or perilinguistically deaf patients with a multi-electrode intracochlear implant. Laryngoscope 1992;102:797-806.
35. Skinner MW, Holden LK, Holden TA, Demorest ME, Fourakis MS: Speech recognition at simulated soft, conversational, and raised-to-loud vocal efforts by adults with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;101:3766-3782.
36. Stach B, Spretnjak ML, Jerger J: The prevalence of central presbycusis in a clinical population. J Am Acad Audiol 1990;1:109-115.
37. Teoh SW, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT: Cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual deafness. I. Clinical results. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1536-1540.
38. Tyler RS, Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Parkinson AJ, Lowder MW, Schum LK: Initial independent results with the Clarion cochlear impact. Ear Hear 1996;17:528-536.
39. Tyler RS, Summerfield AQ: Cochlear implantation: relationships with research on auditory deprivation and acclimatization. Ear Hear 1996;17:38-50.
40. UK Cochlear Implant Study Group: Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults. I. Theory and measures of effectiveness. Ear Hear 2004;25:310-335.
41. Van Rooj JC, Plomp R: Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II. Multivariate analyses. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;88:2611-2624.
42. Van Rooj JC, Plomp R: Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. III. Additional data and final discussion. J Acoust Soc Am 1992;88:2611-2624.
43. Van Rooj JC, Plomp R, Orlebke JF: Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. I. Development of test battery. J Acoust Soc Am 1989;88:2611-2624.
44. Waltzmann SB, Cohen NL: Implantation of patients with prelingual long-term deafness. Ann Otol, Rhinol Laryngol 1999;177:84-87.
45. Waltzmann SB, Cohen NL, Shapiro WH: Sensory aids in conjunction with cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1992;13:308-312.
46. Waltzmann SB, Fisher SG, Niparko JK, Cohen NL: Predictors of postoperative performance with cochlear implants. Ann Oto Rhinol Laryngol 1995;165:15-18.
47. Zwolan TA, Kileny PR, Telian SA: Self-report of cochlear implant use and satisfaction by prelingually deafened adults. Ear Hearing 1996;17:198-210.