Upstream competition and vertical integration in electricity markets

Journal of Law and Economics

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 125-156

  Mansur, Erin T ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249943145     PISSN: 00222186     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/508309     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Abadie, Alberto. 2005. Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators. Review of Economic Studies 72:1-19.
2. Allaz, Blaise, and Jean-Luc Vila. 1993. Cournot Competition, Forward Markets and Efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory 53:1-16.
3. Besley, Timothy, and Anne Case. 2000. Unnatural Experiments? Estimating the Incidence of Endogenous Policies. Economic Journal 110:F672-F694.
4. Blundell, Richard, and Thomas MaCurdy. 2000. Labor Supply. Pp. 1559-1695 in Handbook of Labor Economics, edited by O. Ashenfelter and D. Card. North Holland: Elsevier.
5. Borenstein, Severin, James Bushnell, and Christopher Knittel. 1997. A Cournot-Nash Equilibrium Analysis of the New Jersey Electricity Market. New Jersey Board of Public Utilities. Review of General Public Utilities' Restructuring Petition, Appendix A. Docket No. EA97060396. http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei/PDF/sb_jersey.pdf.
6. Borenstein, Severin, James B. Bushnell, and Frank A. Wolak, 2002. Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market. American Economic Review 92:1376-1405.
7. Borenstein, Severin, and Joseph Farrell. 2000. Is Cost Cutting Evidence of X-Inefficiency? American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 90:224-27.
8. Bowing, Joseph E., William T. Flynn, Robert E. Gramlich, Michael P. McLaughlin, David M. Picarelli, and Steven Stoft. 2000. Monitoring the PJM Energy Market: Summer 1999. POWER Research Conference on Electricity Restructuring. University of California Energy Institute, Berkeley, March 17.
9. Bushnell, James B., Erin T. Mansur, and Celeste Saravia. 2005. Vertical Arrangements, Market Structure, and Competition: An Analysis of Restructured U.S. Electricity Markets. Working Paper No. 126. University of California Energy Institute, Berkeley.
10. Bushnell, James B., and Celeste Saravia. 2002. An Empirical Assessment of the Competitiveness of the New England Electricity Market. Working Paper No. 101. University of California Energy Institute, Berkeley.
11. Energy Information Administration. 1999. The Changing Structure of the Electric Power Industry 1999: Mergers and Other Corporate Combinations, http://tonto.eia.doc.gov/ FTPROOT/electricity/056299.pdf.
12. Genesove, David, and Wallace P. Mullin. 1998. Testing Static Oligopoly Models: Conduct and Cost in the Sugar Industry, 1890-1914. RAND Journal of Economics 29:355-77.
13. Joskow, Paul L., and Edward Kahn. 2002. A Quantitative Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California's Wholesale Electricity Market during Summer 2000. Energy Journal 23:1-35.
14. Kahn, Edward. 2000. Workpapers in Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Case No. 99-EL-ETP. Analysis Group, San Francisco.
15. Kolstad, Jonathan, and Frank A. Wolak. 2003. Using Environmental Emissions Permit Prices to Raise Electricity Prices: Evidence from the California Electricity Market. Working Paper No. 113. University of California Energy Institute, Berkeley, California.
16. Mansur, Erin T. 2003. Vertical Integration in Restructured Electricity Markets: Measuring Market Efficiency and Firm Conduct. Working Paper No. 117. University of California Energy Institute, Berkeley, California.
17. PJM Interconnection. 2000a. PJM Interconnection State of the Market Report, 1999. http://www.pjm.com/markets/market-monitor/downloads/mmu-reports/ state-of-the-market-report-1999.pdf.
18. _. 2000b. PJM Manual for Scheduling Operations. Manual M-14. Version 14. Norristown, Penn.: PJM Interconnection.
19. _. 2000c. Report: June Capacity Market, http://www.pjm.com/markets/ market-monitor/downloads/mmu-reports/rpt-capacity-market200006.pdf.
20. _. 2001a. PJM Interconnection State of the Market Report, 2000. http:// www.pjm.com/markets/market-monitor/downloads/mmu-reports/state-of-the-market- report-2000.pdf.
21. _. 2001b. Report to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission: Capacity Market Questions. http://www.pjm.com/markets/market-monitor/downloads/mmu- reports/ 20011121-rpt-pa-utility.pdf.
22. _. 2002. PJM Interconnection State of the Market Report, 2001. http://www.pjm.com/markets/market-monitor/downloads/mmu-reports/ 200206-pjmmmusom-2001.pdf.
23. Puller, Steven L. 2007. Pricing and Firm Conduct in California's Deregulated Electricity Market. Review of Economics and Statistics 89:75-87.
24. Schweppe, Fred C., Michael C. Caramanis, Richard E. Tabors, and Roger E. Bohn. 1988. Spot Pricing of Electricity. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. Smith, Rebecca, and John J. Fialka. 1999. Juice Squeeze: Electricity Firms Play Many Power Games That Jolt Consumers. Wall Street Journal, August 4.
26. Wolak, Frank A. 2000. An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Hedge Contracts on Bidding Behavior in a Competitive Electricity Market. International Economic Journal 14:1-39.
27. Wolak, Frank A., and Robert H. Patrick. 1997. The Impact of Market Rules and Market Structure on the Price Determination Process in the England and Wales Electricity Market. Working Paper No. 047. University of California Energy Institute, Berkeley.
28. Wolfram, Catherine D. 1998. Strategic Bidding in a Multiunit Auction: An Empirical Analysis of Bids to Supply Electricity in England and Wales. RAND Journal of Economics 29:703-25.
29. _. 1999. Measuring Duopoly Power in the British Electricity Spot Market. American Economic Review 89:805-26.