Intrarenal manipulation of flexible ureteroscopes: A comparative study

BJU International

Volumn 100, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 157-159

  Monga, Manoj ^a   Weiland, Derek ^a   Pedro, Renato N ^a   Lynch, Alexandria C ^a   Anderson, Kyle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Endourology; Medical device; Training model; Ureteroscopy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; HYDRONEPHROSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY CALYX; KIDNEY PELVIS; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGEON; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION; URETEROSCOPE;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALICES; MODELS, ANATOMIC; URETEROSCOPES; URETEROSCOPY;

EID: 34249938122     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06925.x     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Bagley DH. Editorial: Ureteroscopy continues to evolve. J Urol 2003 170 : 111
2. Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R et al. Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study. J Urol 2006 176 : 137 41
3. Brehmer M, Tolley D. Validation of a bench model for endoscopic surgery in the upper urinary tract. Eur Urol 2002 42 : 175 80
4. Bagley DH. Intrarenal access with the flexible ureteroscope: effects of active and passive tip deflection. J Endourol 1993 7 : 221 4