Forgetting of stimulus attributes: Some implications for hippocampal models of memory

Learning and Memory

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 430-432

  Riccio, David C ^a   Joynes, Robin L ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONDITIONING; HIPPOCAMPUS; LEARNING; MEMORY; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MODEL; NONHUMAN; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); FEAR; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMANS; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PREFRONTAL CORTEX;

EID: 34249932966     PISSN: 10720502     EISSN: 15495485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/lm.617107     Document Type: Note

References (19)

1. Anderson, M.J. and Riccio, D.C. 2005. Ontogenetic forgetting of stimulus attributes. Learn. Behav. 33: 444-453.
2. Biedenkapp, J.C. and Rudy, J.W. 2007. Context preexposure prevents forgetting of a contextual fear memory: Implication for regional changes in brain activation patterns associated with recent and remote memory tests. Learn. Mem. 14: 200-203.
3. Fanselow, M.S. 1990. Factors governing one trial contextual conditioning. Anim. Learn. Behav. 18: 264-270.
4. Feinberg, G. and Riccio, D.C. 1990. Changes in memory for stimulus attributes: Implications for tests of morphine tolerance. Psychol. Sci. 1: 265-267.
5. Lubow, R.E. and Moore, A.U. 1959. Latent inhibition: The effect of nonreinforced preexposure to the conditioned stimulus. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 52: 415-419.
6. McAllister, W.R. and McAllister, D.E. 1963. Increase over time in the stimulus generalization of acquired fear. J. Exp. Psychol. 65: 576-582.
7. Misanin, J.R., Miller, R.R., and Lewis, D.J. 1968. Retrograde amnesia produced by electroconvulsive shock after reactivation of a consolidated memory trace. Science 160: 554-555.
8. Penick, K. and Solomon, P. 1991. Hippocampus, context, and conditioning. Behav. Neurosci. 105: 611-617.
9. Perkins, C.C. and Weyant, R.G. 1958. The interval between training and test trial as determiner of the slope of generalization gradients. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 51: 596-600.
10. Riccio, D.C., Richardson, R., and Ebner, D.L. 1984. Memory retrieval deficits based upon altered contextual cues: A paradox. Psychol. Bull. 96: 152-165.
11. Riccio, D.C., Ackil, J., and Burch-Vernon, A. 1992. Forgetting of stimulus attributes: Methodological implications for assessing associative phenomena. Psychol. Bull. 112: 433-445.
12. Riccio, D.C., Rabinowitz, V.C., and Axelrod, A. 1994. Memory: When less is more. Am. Psychol. 49: 917-926.
13. Riccio, D.C., Millin, P.M., and Bogart, A.R. 2006. Reconsolidation: A brief history, a retrieval view, and some recent issues. Learn. Mem. 13: 536-544.
14. Rosas, J.M. and Bouton, M.E. 1997. Additivity of the effects of retention interval and context change on latent inhibition: Toward resolution of the context forgetting paradox. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process 23: 283-294.
15. Sara, S.J. 2000. Retrieval and reconsolidation: Toward a neurobiology of remembering. Learn. Mem. 7: 73-84.
16. Wiltgen, B.J. and Silva, A.J. 2007. Memory for context becomes less specific with time. Learn. Mem. 14: 313-317.
17. Winocur, G., Moscovitch, M., and Sekeres, M. 2007. Memory consolidation or transformation: Context manipulation and hippocampal representations of memory. Nat. Neurosci. 10: 555-557.
18. Zhou, Y.L. and Riccio, D.C. 1994. Pretest cuing can alleviate the forgetting of contextual stimulus attributes. Learn. Motiv. 25: 233-244.
19. Zhou, Y.L. and Riccio, D.C. 1996. Manipulation of components of context: The context shift effect and forgetting of stimulus attributes. Learn. Motiv. 27: 400-407.