Risk factors and risk statistics for sports injuries

Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 208-210

  Hopkins, Will G ^a   Marshall, Stephen W ^b   Quarrie, Kenneth L ^a,c   Hume, Patria A ^a  

^a AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c Research and Injury Prevention   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATHLETE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; HAZARD RATIO; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LANGUAGE; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SAMPLING; SHORT SURVEY; SPORT INJURY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TIME; TRAINING; UNCERTAINTY;

ATHLETIC INJURIES; CAUSALITY; HUMANS; NEW ZEALAND; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 34249914481     PISSN: 1050642X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3180592a68     Document Type: Short Survey

References (7)

1. Meeuwisse WH. Assessing causation in sport injury: a multifactorial model. Clin J Sport Med. 1994;4:166-170.
2. Sterne JA, Davey Smith G. Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests? BMJ. 2001;322:226-231.
3. Poole C. Low p-values or narrow confidence intervals: which are more durable? Epidemiology. 2001;12:291-294.
4. Batterham AM, Hopkins WG. Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes. Sportscience. 2005;9:6-12.
5. Hopkins WG. Magnitude matters. Sportscience. 2006;10:58.
6. Greenland S. Interval estimation by simulation as an alternative to and extension of confidence intervals. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33:1389-1397.
7. Shrier I. Understanding the relationship between risks and odds ratios. Clin J Sport Med. 2006;16:107-110.