Anterior process calcaneal fractures: A systematic evaluation of associated conditions

Skeletal Radiology

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 627-632

  Petrover, David ^a,b   Schweitzer, Mark E ^a   Laredo, J D ^c  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

^b BEAUJON HOSPITAL   (France)

^c HÔPITAL LARIBOISIÈRE   (France)

Author keywords

Ankle; Anterior process; Calcaneus; Coalition; Fracture; MR imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANKLE SPRAIN; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW; CALCANEUS FRACTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSENSUS; EDEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LIGAMENT INJURY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TARSAL BONE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANKLE; ANKLE INJURIES; ANKLE JOINT; CALCANEUS; EDEMA; FEMALE; FRACTURES, BONE; HUMANS; LIGAMENTS, ARTICULAR; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPRAINS AND STRAINS;

EID: 34249908089     PISSN: 03642348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-006-0262-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Dachtler HW. Fractures of the anterior superior portion of the os calcis due to indirect violence. AJR 1931;25: 629-631.
2. Christopher F. Fracture of the anterior process of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg 1931;13: 877-879.
3. Jahss MH, Kay BS. An anatomic study of the anterior superior process of the os calcis and its clinical application. Foot Ankle 1983;3(5): 268-281.
4. Duddy RK, Donahue WE Jr, Cavolo DJ. Anterior calcaneal process fractures. Recognition and treatment. J Am Podiatry Assoc 1984;74(8): 398-401.
5. Robbins MI, Wilson MG, Sella EJ. MR imaging of anterosuperior calcaneal process fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172(2): 475-479.
6. Ouellette H, Salamipour H, Thomas BJ, et al. Incidence and MR imaging features of fractures of the anterior process of calcaneus in a consecutive patient population with ankle and foot symptoms. Skeletal Radiol 2006;35(11): 833-837.
7. Cheung Y, Rosenberg ZS. MR imaging of ligamentous abnormalities of the ankle and foot. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001;9(3): 507-531.
8. Kenneth M, Nalaboff MD, Schweitzer ME. MRI of tarsal coalition: frequency, distribution and innovative signs. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2007; in press.
9. Boks SS, Vroegindeweij D, Koes BW, et al. Follow-up of occult bone lesions detected at MR imaging: Systematic review. Radiology 2006;238(3): 853-862.
10. Gehrmann RM, Rajan S, Patel DV, et al. Athletes' ankle injuries: diagnosis and management. Am J Orthop 2005;34(11): 551-561.
11. Trnka HJ, Zettl R, Ritschl P. Fracture of the anterior superior process of the calcaneus: An often misdiagnosed fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998;117(4-5): 300-302.
12. Boutry N, Vanderhofstadt A, Peetrons P. Ultrasonography of anterosuperior calcaneal process fracture: Report of 2 cases. J Ultrasound Med 2006;25(3): 381-385.
13. Nilsson LJ, Coetzee JC. Stress fracture in the presence of a calcaneonavicular coalition: A case report. Foot Ankle Int 2006;27(5): 373-374.
14. Pouliquen JC, Duranthon LD, Glorion C, et al. The too-long anterior process calcaneus: A report of 39 cases in 25 children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 1998;18(3): 333-336.
15. Hong WH, Lee YH, Chen HC, et al. Influence of heel height and shoe insert on comfort perception and biomechanical performance of young female adults during walking. Foot Ankle Int 2005;26(12): 1042-1048.
16. Dawson J, Thorogood M, Marks SA, et al. The prevalence of foot problems in older women: A cause for concern. J Public Health Med 2002;24(2): 77-84.
17. Daftary A, Haims AH, Baumgaertner MR. Fractures of the calcaneus: A review with emphasis on CT. Radiographics 2005;25(5): 1215-1226.
18. Newman JS, Newberg AH. Congenital tarsal coalition: Multimodality evaluation with emphasis on CT and MR imaging. Radiographics 2000;20(2): 321-332; quiz 526-527, 532.
19. Lysack JT, Fenton PV. Variations in calcaneonavicular morphology demonstrated with radiography. Radiology 2003;230: 493-497.
20. Oestreich AE, Mize WA, Crawford AH, et al. The "anteater nose": A direct sign of calcaneonavicular coalition on the lateral radiograph. J Pediatr Orthop 1987;7(6): 709-711.
21. Emery KH, Bisset G III, Johnson ND, et al. Tarsal coalition: A blinded comparison of MRI and CT. Pediatr Radiol 1998;28(8): 612-616.
22. Wechsler RJ, Schweitzer ME, Deely DM, et al. Tarsal coalition: Depiction and characterization with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 1994;193(2): 447-452.
23. Richards RR, Evans JG, McGoey PF. Fracture of a calcaneonavicular bar: A complication of tarsal coalition. A case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984;185: 220-221.
24. Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Akiyam K, et al. Fracture of the tarsal navicular associated with calcaneonavicular coalition: A case report. Foot Ankle Int 1995;16(12): 800-802.
25. Ceroni D, De Coulon G, Spadola L, et al. Calcaneus secundarius presenting as calcaneonavicular coalition: A case report. J Foot Ankle Surg 2006;45(1): 25-27.
26. Rouvreau P, Pouliquen JC, Langlais J, et al. [Synostosis and tarsal coalitions in children. A study of 68 cases in 47 patients]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1994;80(3): 252-260.