Sir mark potter and the protection of the traditional family: Why same sex marriage is (still) a feminist issue

Feminist Legal Studies

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 223-234

  Harding, Rosie ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

European Convention on Human Rights; Family life; Human rights; Lesbian and gay rights; Same sex marriage

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249906434     PISSN: 09663622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10691-007-9057-y     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Auchmuty, R., "Same-sex Marriage Revived: Feminist Critique and Legal Strategy", Feminism & Psychology 14/1 (2004), 101-126.
2. Calhoun, C., Feminism, The Family, and the Politics of the Closet: Lesbian and Gay Displacement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
3. Clarke, V., "Sameness and Difference in Research on Lesbian Parenting", Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 12 (2002), 210-222.
4. Department of Health, Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act Cm 6989 (Norwich: TSO, 2006).
5. Equal Opportunities Commission, Gender Equality Duty: Draft Code of Practice for England and Wales (London: E.O.C., 2007).
6. Hunter, N.D., "Marriage, Law and Gender: A Feminist Inquiry", Law & Sexuatity 1 (1991), 9-30.
7. Letsas, G., "The Truth in Autonomous Concepts: How to Interpret the E.C.H.R", European Journal of International Law 15 (2004), 279-305.
8. Polikoff, N., "Ending Marriage As We Know It", Hofstra Law Review 32 (2003), 201-232.
9. Robson, R., Sappho Goes to Law School (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998).
10. Singh, R., "Is There a Role for the 'Margin of Appreciation' in National Law After the Human Rights Act?", European Human Rights Law Review 1 (1999), 15-22.