Propofol compared with the morphine, atropine, and suxamethonium regimen as induction agents for neonatal endotracheal intubation: A randomized, controlled trial

Pediatrics

Volumn 119, Issue 6, 2007, Pages

  Ghanta, Satish ^a   Abdel Latif, Mohamed E ^d   Lui, Kei ^a,b   Ravindranathan, Hari ^a   Awad, John ^c   Oei, Julee ^a,b  

^a ROYAL HOSPITAL FOR WOMEN   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c SYDNEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Endotracheal intubation; Neonatal; Propofol; Randomized control trial; Suxamethonium

Indexed keywords

ATROPINE; MORPHINE; PROPOFOL; SUXAMETHONIUM;

APNEA; ARTERIAL OXYGEN SATURATION; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BREATHING; CHILD CARE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; INFANT; LUNG AUSCULTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOUTH INJURY; MUSCLE RELAXATION; MUSCLE SPASM; NOSE INJURY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECOMMENDED DRUG DOSE; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; SLEEP; UNSPECIFIED SIDE EFFECT;

ATROPINE; BLOOD PRESSURE; DRUG THERAPY, COMBINATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; MALE; MORPHINE; MUSCLE RELAXATION; PROPOFOL; SUCCINYLCHOLINE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34249896922     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 02105721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-2708     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Marshall TA, Deeder R, Pai S, Berkowitz GP, Austin TL. Physiologic changes associated with endotracheal intubation in preterm infants. Crit Care Med. 1984;12:501-503
2. Kelly MA, Finer NN. Nasotracheal intubation in the neonate: physiologic responses and effects of atropine and pancuronium. J Pediatr. 1984;105:303-309
3. Millar C, Bissonnette B. Awake intubation increases intracranial pressure without affecting cerebral blood flow velocity in infants. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41:281-287
4. Cook-Sather SD, Tulloch HV, Cnaan A, et al. A comparison of awake versus paralysed tracheal intubation for infants with pyloric stenosis. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:945-951
5. Kong AS, Brennan L, Morgan-Hughes J. An audit of induction of anaesthesia in neonates and small infants using pulse oximetry. Anaesthesia. 1992;47:896-899
6. Oei J, Hari R, Bhuta T, Lui K. Facilitation of neonatal nasotracheal intubation with premedication: a randomised controlled trial. J Paediatr Child Health. 2000;38:146-150
7. McAuliffe G, Bissonette B, Boutin C. Should the routine use of atropine before succinylcholine in children be reconsidered. Can J Anaesth. 1996;43:754-755
8. Hancock S, Newell S, Brierley J, Berry A. Premedication for neonatal intubation-current practice in Australia and the United Kingdom. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000;83:F77
9. Donohoo E, ed. MIMS Online. Sydney, Australia: SMPMedica. Available at: www.mims.hcn.net.au. Accessed October 31, 2006
10. Frawley GP, Carden JR. Suxamethonium induced prolonged apnoea in a premature neonate. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1994;22:192-194
11. Borgeat A, Popovic V, Meier D, Schwander D. Comparison of propofol and thiopental/halothane for short-duration ENT surgical procedures in children. Anesth Analg. 1990;71:511-515
12. De Cosmo G, Congedo E, Clemente A, Aceto P. Sedation in PACU: the role of propofol. Curr Drug Targets. 2005;6:741-744
13. Whyte S, Birrell G, Wyllie J. Premedication before intubation in UK neonatal units. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000;82:F38-F41
14. Parry G, Tucker J, Tarnow-Mordi W; UK Neonatal Staffing Study Collaborative Group. CRIB II: an update of the clinical risk index for babies score. Lancet. 2003;361:1789-1791
15. Naguib M, Lien CA, Aker J, Eliazo R. Posttetanic potentiation and fade in the response to tetanic and train-of-four stimulation during succinylcholine-induced block. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:1686-1691
16. El-Orbany MI, Joseph NJ, Salem MR. Tracheal intubating conditions and apnoea time after small-dose succinylcholine are not modified by the choice of induction agent. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:710-714
17. Shah V, Ohlsson A. The effectiveness of premedication for endotracheal intubation in mechanically ventilated neonates: a systematic review. Clin Perinatol. 2002;29:535-554
18. Bhutada A, Sahni R, Rastogi S, Wung JT. Randomised controlled trial of thiopental for intubation in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000;82:F34-F37
19. Dempsey EM, Al Hazzani F, Faucher D, Barrington KJ. Facilitation of neonatal endotracheal intubation with mivacurium and fentanyl in the NICU. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006;91:F279]F282
20. Carbajal R, Lenclen R, Jugie M, Paupe A, Barton BA, Anand KJ. Morphine does not provide adequate analgesia for acute procedural pain among preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 2005;115:1494-1500
21. Milesi C, Pidoux O, Sabatier E, Badr M, Cambonie G, Picaud JC. Nitrous oxide analgesia for intubating preterm neonates: a pilot study. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95:1104-1108
22. Harnett M, Kinirons B, Heffernan A, Motherway C, Casey W. Airway complications in infants: comparison of laryngeal mask airway and the facemask-oral airway. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47:315-318
23. Simon L, Trifa M, Mokhtari M, Hamza J, Treluyer JM. Premedication for tracheal intubation: a prospective survey in 75 neonatal and pediatric intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:565-568
24. Derbyshire SWG, Furedi A, Glover V, et al. Do fetuses feel pain? BMJ. 1996;313:795-798
25. Wolf AR. Pain, nociception and the developing infant. Paediatr Anaesth. 1999;9:7-17
26. Fitzgerald M, Millard C, Mcintosh N. Cutaneous hypersensitivity following peripheral tissue damage in newborn infants and its reversal with topical anaesthesia. Pain. 1989;39:31-36