Effect of Mi-1.2 gene in natal host plants on behavior and biology of the tomato psyllid Bactericerca cockerelli (Sulc) (Hemiptera: Psyllidae)

Journal of Entomological Science

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 155-162

  Casteel, Clare L ^a,b   Walling, Linda L ^a   Paine, Timothy D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Antibiosis; Antixenosis; Bactericerca cockerelli; Host selection; Plant resistance; Preference; Solanum lycopersicon; Tomato; Tomato psyllid

Indexed keywords

ALEYRODIDAE; APHIDIDAE; BACTERICERA COCKERELLI; HEMIPTERA; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PERUVIANUM; NEMATODA; PSYLLIDAE; SOLANUM;

EID: 34249881086     PISSN: 07498004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18474/0749-8004-42.2.155     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Cassidy, M. D. 1978. Development of an induced food plant preference in the indian stick insect, Carausius morosus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 35: 177-193.
2. Casteel, C. L., L. L. Walling and T. D. Paine. 2006. Behavior and biology of the tomato psyllid Bactericera cockerelli in response to the Mi-1.2 gene. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 121: 67-72.
3. de Boer, G. 2004. Temporal and developmental aspects of diet-induced food preferences in larvae of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 113: 197-204.
4. Hoffmann, A. A. 1985. Effects of experience on oviposition and attraction in Drosophila: comparing apples and oranges. Am. Nat. 126: 41-51.
5. 1988. Early adult experience in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 34: 197-204.
6. Hoffmann, A. A. and M. Turelli. 1985. Distribution of Drosophila melanogaster on alternative resources: effects of experience and starvation. Am. Nat. 126: 662-679.
7. Jaenike, J. 1983. Induction of host preference in Drosophila melanogaster. Oecologia 58: 320-325.
8. 1985. Genetics and environmental determinants of food preference of Drosophila tripunctata. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 39: 362-369.
9. 1988. Effects of early adult experience on host selection in insects: some experimental and theoretical results. J. Insect Behav. 1: 3-15.
10. Jermy, T., F. E. Hanson and V. G. Dethier. 1988. Induction of specific food preference in lepidopterous larvae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 11: 211-230.
11. Kaloshian, I., W. H. Lange and V. M. Williamson. 1995. An aphid resistance locus is tightly linked to the nematode resistance gene, Mi, in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 622-625.
12. Kaloshian, I., M. G. Kinsey, D. E. Ullman and V. M. Williamson. 1997. The impact of Meu1- mediated resistance in tomato on longevity, fecundity, and behavior of the potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 83: 161-167.
13. Knowlton, G. F. and M. J. James. 1931. Studies on the biology of the Paratrioza cockerelli (Sulc). Entomol. Soc. Am. Ann. 24: 263-291.
14. Liu, D., J. T. Trumble and R. Stouthamer. 2006. Genetic differentiation between populations and recent introductions of potato psyllid (Bactericera cockerelli) into western North America. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 116: 177-183.
15. Martinez de Ilarduya, O., A. E. Moore and I. Kaloshian. 2001. The tomato Rme1 locus is required for Mi-1 mediated resistance to root-knot nematodes and potato aphids. Plant J. 27: 417-425.
16. Matkin, O. A. and P. A. Chandler. 1957. The U.C.-type soil mixes, In K. Baker, (ed.), The UC system for producing healthy container-grown plants through the use of dean soil, clean stock and sanitation, Vol. 23, Berkeley, pp. 66-85.
17. Milligan, S. B., J. Bodeau, J. Yaghoobi, I. Kaloshian, P. Zabel and V. M. Williamson. 1998. The root-knot nematode resistance gene Mi from tomato is a member of leucine zipper, nucleotide binding, leucine-rich repeat family of plant genes. Plant Cell 10: 1307-1319.
18. Nombela, G., F. Beitia and M. Muniz. 2000. Variation in tomato host response to Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in relation to acyl sugar content and presence of the nematode and potato aphid resistance gene Mi. Bull. Entomol. Res. 90: 161-167.
19. Nombela, G., V. M. Williamson and M. Muniz. 2003. The root-knot nematode resistance gene Mi-1.2 of tomato is responsible for resistance against the whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 16: 645-649.
20. Pascual, S., M. Aviles, G. Nombela, M. Muniz and F. Beitia. 2000. Development of Bemisia tabaci (biotype Q) on tomato cultivar with / without the Mi gene. Meded Fac Landbouwwet Rijksuniv Gent. 65: 291-292.
21. Phillips, W. M. 1977. Modification of feeding " preference" in flea-beetle, Haltica lythri (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 21: 71-80.
22. Pletsh, D. J. 1947. The potato psyllid Paratrioza cockerelli (Sulc), its biology and control. Mont. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 446: 95.
23. Quinn, W. G., W. A. Harris and S. Benzer. 1974. Conditioned behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71: 708-712.
24. Rausher, M. D. 1983. Ecology of host selection behavior in phytophagus insects, Pp. 223-257. In R.F. Denno and M.S. McClure. (eds.), Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems, Academic Press, London.
25. Rossi, M., F. L. Goggin, S. B. Milligan, I. Kaloshian, D. E. Ullman and V. M. Williamson. 1998. The nematode resistance gene MI of tomato confers resistance against the potato aphid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 9750-8754.
26. Rowe, J. A. and G. F. Knowlton. 1935. Studies upon the morphology of Paratrioza cockerelli (Sulc). Proc. Utah Acad. Sci. 12: 233-239.
27. SAS Institute. 2002. Cary, NC USA.
28. Smith, C. M. 1989. Plant resistance to Insects: a fundamental approach. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY pp 286.
29. Via, S. 1989. Field estimation of variation in host plant use between local populations of pea aphids from two crops. Ecol. Entomol. 14: 357-364.