American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine recommendations for contrast-enhanced liver ultrasound imaging clinical trials

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 705-716

  Greenbaum, Lennard ^a,j   Burns, Peter ^b   Copel, Joshua ^c   Cosgrove, David ^d   Fowlkes, J Brian ^e   Goldberg, Barry ^f   Mattrey, Robert ^g   Merton, Daniel ^f   Robbin, Michelle ^h   Wilson, Stephanie ⁱ  

^a ORLANDO HEALTH   (United States)

^b SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d HAMMERSMITH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^f THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^g UCSD MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^j Winnie Palmer Hospital for Women and Babies Orlando   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LIVER DISEASE; ULTRASOUND; CLINICAL TRIAL; ECHOGRAPHY; LIVER; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARD;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

CLINICAL TRIALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; LIVER; LIVER DISEASES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 34249879825     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.6.705     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Mechanical bioeffects from diagnostic ultrasound: AIUM consensus statements. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19:69-72.
2. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Consensus Conference on Bioeffects of Diagnostic Ultrasound, 2005. J Ultrasound Med. In press.
3. Killam AL, Greener Y, McFerran BA, et al. Lack of bioeffects of ultrasound energy after intravenous administration of FS069 (Optison) in the anesthetized rabbit. J Ultrasound Med 1998; 17:349-356.
4. Ay T, Havauz X, Van Camp G, et al. Destruction of contrast microbubbles by ultrasound effects on myocardial function, coronary perfusion pressure and microvascular integrity. Circulation 2001; 104:461-466.
5. Chen S, Kroll MH, Shohet RV, Frenkel P, Mayer SA, Grayburn PA. Bioeffects of myocardial contrast microbubble destruction by echocardiography. Echocardiography 2002; 19:495-500.
6. Li P, Cao LQ, Dou CY, Armstrong WR, Miller DL. Impact of myocardial contrast echocardiography on vascular permeability: an in vivo dose response study of delivery mode, ultrasound power and contrast dose. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29:1341-1349.
7. Kobayashi N, Yasu T, Yamada S, et al. Influence of contrast ultrasonography with perflutren lipid microspheres on microvessel injury. Circ J 2003; 67:630-636.
8. Li P, Armstrong WR, Miller DL. Impact of myocardial contrast echocardiography on vascular permeability: comparison of three different contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30:83-91.
9. Miller DL, Li P, Armstrong WF. The effect of time and of vasoactive drugs on capillary leakage induced during myocardial contrast echocardiography. Echocardiography 2004; 21:125-132.
10. Miller DL, Li P, Gordon D, Armstrong WF. Histological characterization of microlesions induced by myocardial contrast echocardiography. Echocardiography 2005; 22:25-34.
11. Van der Wouw P, Brauns AC, Bailey SE, Powers JE, Wilde AA. Premature ventricular contractions during triggered imaging with ultrasound contrast. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000; 13:288-294.
12. Borges AC, Walde T, Reibis RK, et al. Does contrast echocardiography with Optison induce myocardial necrosis in humans? J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002; 15:1080-1086.
13. Raisinghani A, Wei KS, Crouse L, et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) with triggered ultrasound does not cause premature ventricular complexes: evidence from PB127 MCE studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16: 1037-1042.
14. Timperley J, Mitchell AR, Thibault H, Mirza IH, Becher H. Safety of contrast dobutamine stress echocardiography: a single center experience. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 163-167.
15. Tsutsui JM, Elhendy A, Xie F, O'Leary EL, McGrain AC, Porter TR. Safety of dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1235-1242.
16. Miller DL, Gies RA. Gas-body-based contrast agent enhances vascular bioeffects of 1.09 MHz ultrasound on mouse intestine. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998; 24:1201-1208.
17. Kobayashi N, Yasu T, Yamada S, et al. Endothelial cell injury in venule and capillary induced by contrast ultrasonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28:949-956.
18. Wible JH Jr, Galen KP, Wojdyla JK, Hughes MS, Klibanov AL, Brandenburger GH. Microbubbles induce renal hemorrhage when exposed to diagnostic ultrasound in anesthetized rats. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28:1535-1546.
19. Shigeta K, Itoh K, Ookawara S, Taniguchi N, Omoto K. Endothelial cell injury and platelet aggregation induced by contrast ultrasonography in the rat hepatic sinusoid. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23:29-36.
20. Miller DL, Dou C. Contrast-aided diagnostic ultrasound does not enhance lung metastasis in a mouse melanoma tumor model. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24:349-354.
21. Cochran ST. Anaphylactoid reactions to radiocontrast media. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2005; 5:28-31.
22. Jakobsen JÅ, Oyen R, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Members of the Contrast Media Safety Committee of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Safety of ultrasound contrast agents. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:941-945.
23. Niendorf HP, Haustein J, Cornelius I, Alhassan A, Claus W. Safety of gadolinium-DTPA: extended clinical experience. Magn Reson Med 1991; 22:222-228.