Intergenerational family ties and the diffusion of cohabitation in Italy

Demographic Research

Volumn 16, Issue , 2007, Pages 441-468

  Di Giulio, Paula ^a   Rosina, Alessandro ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249879627     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14359871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2007.16.14     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Axinn, W. and Thornton, A. (1993). Mothers, children and cohabitation: the intergenerational effects of attitudes and behavior. American Sociological Review, 58(2):233-246.
2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ:.
3. Barbagli, M. (1997). Family and kinship in Italy. In Family and kinship in Europe, pages 33-48. Pinter, London.
4. Barbagli, M., Castiglioni, M., and Dalla Zuanna, G. (2003). Fare famiglia in Italia. Un secolo di cambiamenti. Il Mulino, Bologna.
5. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.
6. Behrman, J. R. (1997). Intrahousehold distribution and the family. In Rosenweig, M. R. and Stark, O., editors, Handbook of Population and Family Economics. Vol I., pages 125-187. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
7. Bernhardt, E. (2004). Cohabitation or marriage? Preferred living arrangements in Sweden. sdf-puzzle. http://www.oif.ac.at/sdf/ sdf04-04-bernhardt.pdf (date of access: September 2006).
8. Bernhardt, E. and Hoem, B. (1985). Cohabitation and social background: Trends observed for Swedish women born between 1936 and 1960. European Journal of Population, 1(4):375-395.
9. Billari, F. and Rosina, A. (2005). 'Mamma' and the diffusion of cohabitation: the Italian case. Population Association of America, 2005 Annual Meeting, Philadelphia 2005.
10. Billari, F. C. and Ongaro, F. (1999). Lasciare la famiglia, d'origine: Quando e perché? In De Sandre, A., Pinnelli, A., and Santini, A., editors, Nuzialità e fecondità in trasformazione: percorsi e fattori del cambiamento, pages 327-346. Il Mulino, Bologna.
11. Blossfeld, H. and Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women's schooling and career affects the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(1):143-168.
12. Booth, A. and Amato, R R. (1994). Parental gender role nontraditionalism and offspring outcomes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56(4):865-877.
13. Braun, N. and Engelhardt, H. (2004). Diffusion processes and event history analysis. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, pages 111-132.
14. Bumpass, L. (1990). What's happening to the family? Interaction between demographic and institutional change. Demography, 27(4):483-498.
15. Cavalli, A. and De Lillo, A. (1993). Giovani anni '90, Terzo rapporto IARD sulla condizione giovanile in Italia. IL Mulino, Bologna.
16. Dalla Zuanna, G. (2001). The banquet of Aeolus: A familistic interpretation of Italy's lowest low fertility. Demographic Research, 4:133-161.
17. Dalla Zuanna, G. and Micheli, G. (2004). Strong family, familism and lowest-low fertility. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht.
18. De Sandre, P. (2000). Patterns of fertility in Italy and factors of its decline. Genus, LVI(1-2).
19. De Singly, F. (1986). L'union libre: un compromise. Dialogue, 2.
20. De Valk, H. and Liefbroer, A. C. (2004). Invloed van ouders; op relatievormingsvoorkeuren van turkse, marokkaanse en autochtone jongeren in Nederland. Migrantenstudies, 20(3):108-129.
21. Di Giulio, P. (2004). Legami familiari forti e diffusione delle convivenze in Italia. Doctoral thesis, Università La Sapienza, Roma.
22. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford University Press, New York.
23. Ferrera, M. (1996). The 'southern model' of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1):17-37.
24. Flouri, E. and Buchanan, A. (2001). What predicts traditional attitudes to marriage? Children and Society, 15(4):263-271.
25. Goldscheider, F. and Goldscheider, C. (1993). Whose nest? A two-generational view of leaving home during the 1980s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(4):851-862.
26. Goldscheider, F. and Goldscheider, C. (1999). The changing transition to adulthood. Leaving and returning home. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
27. Gruppo di Coordinamento per la Demografia (2007). Rapporto sulla popolazione. L'Italia all'inizio del XXI secolo. Il Mulino, Bologna.
28. Hoem, J. (1986). The impact of education on modem family union initiation. European Journal of Population, 2(2):113-133.
29. Kiernan, K. (1999). Cohabitation in western Europe. Population Trends, 96:25-32.
30. Kulik, L. (2002). The impact of social background on gender-role ideology - parents' versus children's attitudes. Journal of Family Issues, 23(1):53-73.
31. Lesthaeghe, R. and Neels, K. (2002). From the first to the second demographic transition: an interpretation of the spatial continuity of demographic innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland. European Journal of Population, 18(4):325-360.
32. Lesthaeghe, R. and van de Kaa, D. (1986). Twee demografische transities? In Groei en Krimp, Mens en Maatschappij, pages 9-24. Deventer.
33. Liefbroer, A. and de Jong Gierveld, J. (1993). The impact of rational considerations and perceived opinions on young adults' union formation intentions. Journal of Family Issues, 14(2):213-235.
34. Manting, D. (1996). The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage. European Sociological Review, 12(1):53-65.
35. Micheli, G. (2000). Kinship, family and social network: the anthropological embedment of fertility change in southern Europe. Demographic Research, 3(13).
36. Montgomery, M. R. and Casterline, J. B. (1996). Social learning, social influence, and new models of fertility. Population and Development Review, 22:151-175. Supplement: Fertility in the United States: New Patterns, New Theories.
37. Nazio, T. and Blossfeld, H.-P. (2003). The diffusion of cohabitation among young women in West Germany, East Germany and Italy. European Journal of Population, 19(1):47-82.
38. Oppenheimer, V. K. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men's career development. Demography, 40(1):127-149.
39. Palloni, A. (2001). Diffusion in sociological analysis. In Casterline, J. B., editor, Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
40. Pinquart, M. and Silbereisen, R. (2004). Transmission of values from adolescents to their parents: The role of value content and authoritative parenting. Adolescence, 39:83-100.
41. Prinz, C. (1995). Cohabiting, Married or Single. Avebury, England.
42. Reher, D. S. (1998). Family ties in western Europe: persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24(2):203-234.
43. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York.
44. Rosina, A. (2002). Le prime unioni alternative al matrimonio. In Famiglie, mutamenti e politiche sociali Vol. I, Osservatorio Nazionale sulle famiglie e le politiche locali di sostegno alle responsabilità familiari. il Mulino, Bologna.
45. Rosina, A. and Billari, F. (2003). Flessibilità all'entrata in unione: i precursori del cambiamento. In Breschi, M. and Livi Bacci, M., editors, La bassa fecondità in Italia: tra costrizioni economiche e cambio di valori. Forum, Udine.
46. Rosina, A. and Fraboni, R. (2004). Is marriage losing its centrality in Italy? Demographic Research, 11:149-172.
47. Rosina, A., Fraboni, R., and Sabbadini, L. (2003). Diventare uomini e donne in italia. In Pinnelli, A., Racioppi, F., and Retttaroli, R., editors, Genere e demografia. Il Mulino, Bologna.
48. Rosina, A. and Micheli, G. (2006). Modelli familiari e negoziazione dei percorsi di transizione allo stato adulto. Proceedings from the Congress: Famiglie, nascite e politiche sociali, Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. 28 - 29 April 2005.
49. Rudy, D. and Grusec, J. (2001). Correlates of authoritarian parenting in individualist and collectivist cultures and implications for understanding the transmission of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(2):202-212.
50. Sabbadini, L. L. (1991). Le libere unioni. In Menniti, A., editor, Le famiglie italiane negli anni '80. Monografie IRP, Roma.
51. Saraceno, C. (1998). Mutamenti della famiglia e politiche sociali in Italia. Il Mulino, Bologna.
52. Scabini, E. (2000). Parent-child relationships in Italian families: Connectedness and autonomy in the transition to adulthood. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 16(1):23-30.
53. Schoenpflug, U. (2001). Decision-making influence in the family: A comparison of Turkish families in Germany and in Turkey. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32(2):219-230.
54. Schoenpflug, U. and Silbereisen, R. K. (1992). Transmission of values between generations in the family regarding societal keynote issues: a cross-cultural longitudinal study on Polish and German families. In Iwawaki, S., Kashima, Y., and Leung, K., editors, Innovations in Cross-Cultural Psychology. Swets & Zeitlinger, Amsterdam. pages 269-278.
55. Schroeder, C. (2006). Cohabitation in Italy: Do parents matter? Genus, 62(3-4):53-85.
56. Smock, P. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26:1-20.
57. Strang, D. and Tuma, N. B. (1993). Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in diffusion. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3):614-639.
58. Thornton, A. and Camburn, D. (1987). The influence of the family on premarital sexual attitudes and behavior. Demography, 24(3):323-340.
59. Trent, K. and South, S. J. (1992). Sociodemographic status, parental background, chilhood family structure, and attitudes toward family formation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(2):427-439.
60. Van der Slik, F., De Graaf, N., and Gerris, J. (2002). Conformity to parental rules: Asimmetric influences of father's and mother's levels of education. European Sociological Review, 18(4):489-502.
61. Viazzo, P. (2003). What's so special about the Mediterranean? Thirty years of research on household and family in Italy. Continuity and Change, 18(1):111-137.
62. Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (1991). From marriage to informal union: Recent changes in the behaviour of French couples. Population an English Selection, 3:8 1-111.
63. Wright, D. and Young, R. (1998). The effects of family structure and maternal employment on the development of gender-related attitudes among men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 19(3):300-314.
64. Wu, Z. (2000). Cohabitation. An Alternative Form of Family Living. Oxford University Press, Oxford.