Re-conceptualizing the Belmont report: A community-based participatory research perspective

Journal of Community Practice

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 5-26

  Shore, Nancy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Belmont Report; Community based participatory research; Ethics; IRB

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249867381     PISSN: 10705422     EISSN: 15433706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J125v14n04_02     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Belmont Report (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved December 12, 2005, from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/ belmont.html.
2. Beauchamp, T. & Childress, J. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics (4th ed.). New York, NY: University Press.
3. Beauchamp, T. & Childress, J. (1997). From principles of biomedical ethics [selection]. In N. Jecker, A. Jonsen & R. Pearlman (Eds.), Bioethics: An introduction to the history, methods, and practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
4. Carrese, J. & Rhodes, L. (1995). Western bioethics on the Navajo Reservation: Benefit or harm? JAMA, 274(10), 826-829.
5. de Laine, M. (2000). Fieldwork, participation and practice: Ethics and dilemmas in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
6. Evans, J. (2000, September-October). A sociological account of the growth of principlism. Hastings Center Report, 31-38.
7. Goodman, K. W. & Prineas, R. J. (1996). Toward an ethics curriculum in epidemiology. In S. Coughlin & T. Beauchamp (Eds.), Ethics and epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8. Israel, B., Schulz, A., Parker, E. & Becker, A. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review Public Health, 19, 173-202.
9. Jonsen, A. (1996). Ethics of research involving human subjects. In H. Vanderpool (Ed.), The ethics of research involving human subjects: Facing the 21st century. Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group, Inc.
10. Jonsen, A. & Toulmin, S. (1988). The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11. King, N., Henderson, G. & Stein, J. (1999). Relationships in research: A new paradigm. In N. King, G. Henderson & J. Stein (Eds.), Beyond regulations: Ethics in human subjects research. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
12. Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
13. Longres, J. & Scanlon, E. (2001). Social justice and the research curriculum. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(3), 447-463.
14. Macklin, R. (1999) Against relativism: Cultural diversity and the search for ethical universals in medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15. McGough, H. (2001, June). Ethics of research with humans: Past, present, & future. Paper presented at Ethics of Research with Humans: Past, Present, and Future, Seattle.
16. Oakes, J.M. (2002). Risks and wrongs in social science research: An evaluator's guide to the IRB. Retrieved March 15, 2002, from www.epi.umn.edu/epi_pages/people/oakes.html.
17. Sherwin, S. (1992). No longer patient: Feminist ethics & health care Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
18. Shore, N. (2004). Human subjects regulations and the ethical review process: Conventional social science and community-based participatory researchers' perceptions & recommendations for change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
19. Tai, M.C. & Lin, C.S. (2001). Developing a culturally relevant bioethics for Asian people. Journal of Medical Ethics, 27, 51-54.
20. Vanderpool, H. (1996). The ethics of research involving human subjects: Facing the 21st century. Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group, Inc.