Biomechanical study of lumbar spine with dynamic stabilization device using finite element method

CAD Computer Aided Design

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 559-567

  Shin, Dong Suk ^a   Lee, Kunwoo ^a   Kim, Daniel ^b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic stabilization; Facetectomy; Finite element method; Laminectomy; Spinal fusion

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; STABILITY; STIFFNESS;

FACETECTOMY; LUMBAR SPINE; PARAMETRIC STUDY; RANGE OF MOTION (ROM);

BIOMECHANICS;

EID: 34249865600     PISSN: 00104485     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2007.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Weinhoffer S.L., Guyer R.D., Herbert M., and Griffith S.L. Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study. Spine 20 5 (1995) 526-531
2. Lee C.K., and Langrana N.A. Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study. Spine 9 6 (1984) 574-581
3. Rahm M.D., and Hall B.B. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: A retrospective study. J Spinal Disord 9 5 (1996) 392-400
4. Whitecloud III T.S., Davis J.M., and Olive P.M. Operative treatment of the degenerated segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 19 5 (1994) 531-536
5. Ghiselli G., Wang J.C., Bhatia N.N., Wellington K.H., and Dawson E.G. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg 86 (2004) 1497-1503
6. Bastian L., Lange U., Knop C., Thsch G., and Blauth M. Evaluation of the mobility of adjacent segments after posterior thoracolumbar fixation: A biomechanical study. Eur Spine J 10 (2001) 295-300
7. Chou W.Y., Hsu C.J., Chang W.N., and Wong C.Y. Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterior fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122 (2002) 39-43
8. Lai P.-L., Chen L.-H., Niu C.-C., Fu T.-S., and Chen W.-J. Relation between laminectomy and development of adjacent segment instability after lumbar fusion with pedicle fixation. Spine 29 22 (2004) 2527-2532
9. Chen C.S., Cheng C.K., Liu C.L., and Lo W.H. Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lumbar spine. Med Eng Phys 23 (2001) 483-491
10. Chen C.S., Feng C.K., Cheng C.K., Tzeng M.J., Liu C.L., and Chen W.J. Biomechanical analysis of the disc adjacent to posterolateral fusion with laminectomy in lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 18 1 (2005) 58-65
11. Kanayama M., Hashimoto T., Shigenobu K., Harada M., Oha F., Ohkoshi Y., et al. Adjacent-segment morbidity after Graf ligamentoplasty compared with posterolateral lumbar fusion. J Neurosurgery 95 1 (2002) 5-10
12. Nohara H., and Kanaya F. Biomechanical study of adjacent intervertebral motion after lumbar spinal fusion and flexible stabilization using polyethylene-terephthalate bands. J Spinal Disord Tech 17 (2004) 215-219
13. Rohlmann A., Calisse J., and Bergmann G. Internal spinal stiffness has only a minor influence on stresses in the adjacent discs. Spine 24 12 (1999) 1192-1196
14. Rohlmann A., Neller S., Bergmann G., Graichen F., Claes L., and Wilke H. Effect of an internal fixator and a bone graft on intersegmental spinal motion and intradiscal pressure in the adjacent regions. Eur Spine J 10 (2001) 301-308
15. Ghiselli G., Wang J., Hsu W., and Dawson E. L5-S1 segment survivorship and clinical outcome analysis after l4-l5 isolated fusion. Spine 12 (2003) 1275-1280
16. Okuda S., Iwasaki M., Miyauchi A., Aono H., Morita M., and Yamamoto T. Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF. Spine 14 (2004) 1535-1540
17. Hilibrand A.S., and Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: The consequences of spinal fusion?. The Spinal J 4 (2004) 190S-4S
18. Park P., Carton J.G., Gala V.C., Hoff J.T., and McGillicuddy J.E. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: Review of the literature. Spine 29 17 (2004) 1938-1944
19. Goto K., Tajima N., Chosa E., Totoribe K., Shinichiro S., and Kuroki H. Effect of lumbar spinal fusion on the other lumbar intervertebral levels (three-dimensional finite element analysis). J Orthop Sci 8 (2003) 577-584
20. Lee K.K., Teo E.C., Fuss F.K., Vanneuville V., Qiu T.X., Ng H.W., et al. Finite-element analysis for lumbar interbody fusion under axial loading. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51 3 (2004) 393-400
21. Totoribe K., Chosa E., and Tajima N. A biomechanical study of lumbar fusion based on a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element method. J Spinal Disord Tech 17 2 (2004) 147-153
22. Sengupta D.K. Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain. Orthop Clin N Am 35 (2004) 43-56
23. Graf H. Lumbar instability. Surgical treatment without fusion. Rachis 412 (1992) 123-137
24. Stoll T.M., Dubios G., and Schwarzenbach O. The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: A multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 11 Suppl. 2 (2002) S170-8
25. Sengupta DK, Ohnmeiss D, Guyer RD, Hochschler S, Mulholland RC. Fulcrum assisted soft stabilization in the treatment of low back pain - A new concept. In: The international society for the study of the lumbar spine annual meeting. 1999
26. Sengupta DK, Herkowitz HN, Hochschuler S, Mulholland RC. Load sharing characteristics of two novel soft stabilization devices in the lumbar motion segments - A biomechanical study in cadaver spine. In: Spine arthroplasty society annual conference. 2003
27. S. F., Dubios G., and Lorrain M. Dynamic neutralization of the lumbar spine confirmed on a new lumbar spine simulator in vitro. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 199 (1999) 127-132
28. Schmoelz W., Huber J.F., Nydegger T., Claes L., and Wilke H.J. Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments. J Spinal Disord Tech 16 4 (2003) 418-423
29. Grob D., Benini A., Junge A., and Mannion A.F. Clinical experience with the dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine. Spine 30 3 (2005) 324-331
30. Sengupta D.K., and Mulholland R.C. Fulcrum assisted soft stabilization system. Spine 30 9 (2005) 1019-1029
31. Eberlein R. Assessment of a spinal implant by means of advanced FE modeling of intact human intervertebral discs. In: Fifth world congress on computational mechanics. 2002
32. Wolf A., Shoham M., Michael S., and Moshe R. Morphometric study of the human lumbar spine for operation-workspace specifications. Spine 26 22 (2001) 2472-2477
33. Eijkelkamp MF, Klein JP, Veldhuizen AG, van Horn JR, Verkerke GJ. The geometry and shape of the human intervertebral disc. Spine [submitted for publication]
34. Goel V.K., Monroe B.T., Gilbertson L.G., and Brinckmann P. Interlaminar shear stresses and laminae separation in a disc. Spine 20 6 (1995) 689-698
35. Brown M.D., Holmes D.C., Heiner A.D., and Wehman K.F. Intraoperative measurement of lumbar spine motion segment stiffness. Spine 27 9 (2002) 954-958
36. Kanayama M., Hashimoto T., Shigenobu K., Oha F., Ishida T., and Yamane S. Intraoperative biomechanical assessment of lumbar spinal instability: Validation of radiographic parameters indicating anterior column support in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine 28 20 (2003) 2368-2372
37. Yamamoto I., Panjabi M.M., Crisco T., and Oxland T. Three-dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint. Spine 14 11 (1989) 1256-1260
38. AMIRA. Mercury Computer Systems, Inc. http://www.tgs.com
39. Rapidform. INUS Technology. http://www.rapidform.com
40. Soild Works. Solid Works Corporation. http://www.soildworks.com
41. ANSYS. ANSYS, Inc. http://www.ansys.com
42. Eberlein R., Holzapfel G.A., and Frohlich M. Multi-segment FEA of the human lumbar spine including the heterogeneity of the annulus fibrosus. Comput Mech 34 (2004) 147-163