Sharing geographic information: An assessment of the geospatial one-stop

Annals of the Association of American Geographers

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 250-266

  Goodchild, Michael F ^a   Fu, Pinde ^b   Rich, Paul ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b ESRI   (United States)

^c Creekside Center for Earth Observation   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital library; Geoportal; Metadata; Spatial data

Indexed keywords

GIS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET; SPATIAL DATA; WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 34249851662     PISSN: 00045608     EISSN: 14678306     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00534.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Albrecht, J. 1999. Geospatial information standards: A comparative study of approaches to the standardization of geospatial information. Computers and Geosciences 25: 9-24.
2. Baker, J. C., B. Lachman, D. Frelinger, K. M. O'Connell, A. C. Hou, M. S. Tseng, D. T. Orletsky, and C. Yost. 2004. Mapping the risks: Assessing the homeland security implications of publicly available geospatial information. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. Available at http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG142/; (last accessed 18 January 2006).
3. Carroll, L. 1894. Sylvie and Bruno concluded. New York: Macmillan.
4. Craig, W. J., T. M. Harris, and D. Weiner. 2002. Community participation and geographic information systems. New York: Taylor & Francis.
5. Crompvoets, J., and A. Bregt. 2003. World status of national spatial data clearinghouses. URISA Journal 15: 43-50.
6. Crompvoets, J., A. Rajabifard, A. Bregt, and I. Williamson. 2004. Assessing the worldwide developments of national spatial data clearinghouses. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 18 (7): 665-89.
7. Curry, M. R. 1998. Digital places: Living with geographic information technologies. New York: Routledge.
8. Eco, U. 1994. How to travel with a salmon and other essays, trans. William Weaver. New York: Harcourt Brace.
9. Fabrikant, S. I., and B. P. Buttenfield. 2001. Formalizing semantic spaces for information access. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91: 263-80.
10. Federal Geographic Data Committee. 1996. Coordination and integration of wetland data for status and trends and inventory estimates. Technical Report 2. Washington, DC: Department of the Interior.
11. Goodchild, M. F. 1997. Towards a geography of geographic information in a digital world. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 21 (6): 377-91.
12. Goodchild, M. F. 2002. Measurement-based GIS. In Spatial data quality, ed. W. Shi, P. F. Fisher, and M. F. Goodchild, 5-17. New York: Taylor & Francis.
13. Goodchild, M. F. 2004. The Alexandria Digital Library: Review, assessment, and prospects. D-Lib Magazine 10(5). Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may04/goodchild/05goodchild.html (last accessed 18 January 2006).
14. Goodchild, M. F., M. J. Egenhofer, R. Fegeas, and C. A. Kottman, eds. 1999. Interoperating geographic information systems. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
15. Goodchild, M. F., M. J. Egenhofer, K. K. Kemp, D. M. Mark, and E. Sheppard. 1999. Introduction to the Varenius project. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 13 (8): 731-45.
16. Goodchild, M. F., and S. Gopal. 1989. Accuracy of spatial databases. New York: Taylor & Francis.
17. Goodchild, M. F., and J. Zhou. 2003. Finding geographic information: Collection-level metadata. GeoInformatica 7 (2): 95-112.
18. Groot, R., and J. McLaughlin, eds. 2000. Geospatial data infrastructure: Concepts, cases and good practice. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
19. Harley, J. B. 2001. The new nature of maps: Essays in the history of cartography, ed. P. Laxton. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20. Hill, L. L., G. Janée, R. Dolin, J. Frew, and M. Larsgaard. 1999. Collection metadata solutions for digital library applications. Santa Barbara, CA: Alexandria Digital Library, University of California.
21. Kline, K. D. 2004. A quantitative analysis of the users of global environmental data sets. Unpublished PhD diss., Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara.
22. Kwan, M.-P. 2002. Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92 (4): 645-61.
23. Longley, P. A., M. F. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire, and D. W. Rhind. 2005. Geographic information systems and science, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
24. Maguire, D. J., and P. A. Longley. 2005. The emergence of geoportals and their role in spatial data infrastructures. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 29 (1): 3-14.
25. Mapping Science Committee, National Research Council. 1993. Toward a coordinated spatial data infrastructure for the nation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. Mapping Science Committee, National Research Council. 1999. Distributed geolibraries: Spatial information resources. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27. Mapping Science Committee, National Research Council. 2001. National spatial data infrastructure partnership programs: Rethinking the focus. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28. Masser, I. 1998. Governments and geographic information. New York: Taylor & Francis.
29. Masser, I. 1999. All shapes and sizes: The first generation of national spatial data infrastructures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 13: 67-84.
30. Müller, J.-C., J.-P. Lagrange, and R. Weibel, eds. 1995. GIS and generalization: Methodology and practice. London: Taylor & Francis.
31. National Research Council. 2004. Licensing geographic data and services. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available at books.nap.edu/ catalog/11079.html (last accessed 18 January 2006).
32. New York Times. 2005 Governments tremble at Google's bird's-eye view. New York Times, 20 December.
33. Onsrud, H. J., G. Camara, J. Campbell, and N. S. Chakravarthy. 2004. Public commons of geographic data: Research and development challenges. In Geographic information science, ed. M. J. Egenhofer, C. Freksa, and H. J. Miller, 223-38. Lecture Notes in Computer Science no. 3234. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
34. Pedley, M. S. 2005. The commerce of cartography: Making and marketing maps in eighteenth-century France and England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Peuquet, D. J. 2002. Representations of space and time. New York: Guilford.
36. Pickles, J., ed. 1995. Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems. New York: Guilford.
37. Schuurman, N. 2005. Database ethnographies: Creating spatial metadata for informed decision-making. Paper presented to the Department of Geography Colloquium, University of California, Santa Barbara, 17 February.
38. Shapiro, C., and H. R. Varian. 1999. Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
39. Shneiderman, B., and C. Plaisant. 2005. Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Boston: Pearson/ Addison Wesley.
40. Smith, N. 1992. Real wars, theory wars. Progress in Human Geography 16: 257-71.
41. Thrower, N. J. W. 1996. Maps and civilization: Cartography in culture and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Williamson, I., A. Rajabifard, and M. E. Feeney. 2003. Developing spatial data infrastructures: From concept to reality. London: Taylor & Francis.
43. Wood, D., with J. Fels. 1992. The power of maps. New York: Guilford.