Abstract-to-publication ratio for papers presented at scientific meetings: A quality marker for UK emergency medicine research

Emergency Medicine Journal

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 425-426

  Macmillan, Craig D ^a   Moore, Anthony K ^a   Cook, Ronald J ^b   Pedley, David K ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NINEWELLS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT REPORT; ARTICLE; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; EVALUATION RESEARCH; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDLINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING; CONGRESSES; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PERIODICALS; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 34249848833     PISSN: 14720205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/emj.2007.046078     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Sloan EP, Bunney B, Silva J, et al. A structured process for fulfilling resident research requirement. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8:A582.
2. Gorman RL, Oderda GM. Publication of presented abstracts at scientific meetings: a marker of quality? Vet Hum Toxicol 1990; 32:470-2.
3. Walby A, Kelly A, Georgakas C. Abstract to publication ratio for papers presented at scientific meetings: how does emergency medicine compare? Emerg Med 2001;13:460-4.
4. Korn CS, Henderson SO. Publication of research abstracts presented at four emergency medicine research forums. Acad Emerg Med 2000; 7:534.
5. Tintinalli J. Publish or perish: easier said than done. Emerg Med 2001;13:407-8.
6. Weber E, Callaham M, Wears RL, et al. Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting: why investigators fail to publish. JAMA 1998;280:257-9.