When is a failure to replicate not a Type II error?

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 405-407

  Vasconcelos, Marco ^a,c   Urcuioli, Peter J ^a   Lionello DeNolf, Karen M ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Overtraining; Replication; Type I error; Type II error; Within trial contrast; Work ethic effect

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 34249845415     PISSN: 00225002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2007.10-07     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Bower, G. H., & Mayer, J. D. (1989). In search of mood-dependent retrieval. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 121-156.
2. Bulevich, J. B., Roediger, H. L. III, Balota, D. A., & Butler, A. C. (2006). Failures to find suppression of episodic memories in the think/no-think paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1569-1577.
3. Clement, T. S., Feltus, J., Kaiser, D. H., & Zentall, T. R. (2000). "Work ethic" in pigeons: Reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 100-106.
4. Fernandez, A., & Glenberg, A. M. (1985). Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 333-345.
5. Klein, E. D., & Zentall, T. R. (2002). [Failure to replicate the "work ethic" effect in pigeons]. Unpublished raw data.
6. Smith, S. M. (1979). Enhancement of recall using multiple environmental contexts during learning. Memory & Cognition, 10, 405-412.
7. Vasconcelos, M., Urcuioli, P. J., & Lionello-DeNolf, K. M. (2007). Failure to replicate the "work ethic" effect in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 383-399.
8. Zentall, T. R., & Singer, R. A. (2007). Within-trial contrast: When is a failure to replicate not a Type I error? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 401-404.
9. Zentall, T. R., Clement, T. S., Friedrich, A. M., & DiGian, K. A. (2006). Stimuli signaling reward that follow a less-preferred event are themselves preferred: Implication for cognitive dissonance. In E. A. Wasserman, & T. R. Zentall (Eds.), Comparative cognition: Experimental explorations of animal intelligence (pp. 651-667). NY: Oxford University Press.