Postprocedural resistance of the target lesion is a strong predictor of subsequent revascularization: Assessment by a novel lesion-specific physiological parameter, the epicardial resistance index

Heart and Vessels

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 139-145

  Suzuki, Kazuhito ^a   Tsurumi, Yukio ^a   Fuda, Yuji ^a   Ishii, Yasuhiro ^a   Takagi, Atsushi ^a   Hagiwara, Nobuhisa ^a   Kasanuki, Hiroshi ^a  

^a TOKYO WOMEN'S MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Coronary physiology; Coronary stenosis; Restenosis

Indexed keywords

HEPARIN; ISOSORBIDE DINITRATE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE; CORONARY HEMODYNAMICS; CORONARY STENT; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; HYPEREMIA; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREDICTION; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PRESSURE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STENTS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

EID: 34249844879     PISSN: 09108327     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-006-0945-x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. NH Pijls B Van Gelder P Van Der Voort K PeEls FA Bracke HJ Bonnier MI El Gamal 1995 Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow [see comments] Circulation 92 3183-3193 7586302 1:STN:280:BymD1c%2FgslQ%3D
2. NH Pijls B De Bruyne K Peels PH Van Der Voort HJ Bonnier JKJJ Bartunek JJ Koolen 1996 Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses New England Journal of Medicine 334 1703-1708 8637515 10.1056/NEJM199606273342604 1:STN:280:BymB2c%2FltlU%3D
3. A Takagi Y Tsurumi Y Ishii K Suzuki M Kawana H Kasanuki 1999 Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: Relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve Circulation 100 250-255 10411848 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzktF2htw%3D%3D
4. S Suemaru K Iwasaki K Yamamoto S Kusachi K Hina S Hirohata M Hirota M Murakami S Kamikawa T Murakami Y Shiratori 2005 Coronary pressure measurement to deter-mine treatment strategy for equivocal left main coronary artery lesions Heart and Vessels 20 271-277 16314909 10.1007/ s00380-005-0849-1
5. B De Bruyne NH Pijls GR Heyndrickx D Hodeige R Kirkeeide KL Gould 2000 Pressure-derived fractional flow reserve to assess serial epicardial stenoses: Theoretical basis and animal validation Circulation 101 1840-1847 10769286 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3jtlyitw%3D%3D
6. GJ Bech NH Pijls B De Bruyne KH Peels HR Michels HJ Bonnier JJ Koolen 1999 Usefulness of fractional flow reserve to predict clinical outcome after balloon angioplasty Circulation 99 883-888 10027810 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7lt1SksA%3D%3D
7. PW Serruys C di Mario J Piek E Schroeder C Vrints P Probst B De Bruyne C Hanet E Fleck M Haude E Verna V Voudris H Geschwind H Emanuelsson V Muhlberger G Danzi HO Peels AJ Ford Jr E Boersma 1997 Prognostic value of intracoronary flow velocity and diameter stenosis in assessing the short- and long-term outcomes of coronary balloon angioplasty: The DEBATE Study (Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe) Circulation 96 3369-3377 9396429 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FlslWitw%3D%3D
8. NHJ Pijls B De Bruyne GJW Bech F Liistro GR Heyndrickx HJRM Bonnier JJ Koolen 2000 Coronary pressure measurement to assess the hemodynamic significance of serial stenosis within one coronary artery: Validation in humans Circulation 102 2371-2377 11067791 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crhtlWnsg%3D%3D
9. C Lamm M Dohnal PW Serruys H Emanuelsson 1993 High-fidelity translesional pressure gradients during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: Correlation with quantitative coronary angiography Am Heart J 126 66-75 8322693 1:STN:280:ByyA3M7jtlU%3D
10. HV Anderson GS Roubin PP Leimgruber WR Cox JS Douglas Jr King SBd AR Gruentzig 1986 Measurement of transstenotic pressure gradient during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty Circulation 73 1223-1230 2938848 1:STN:280:BimC1M%2FkslY%3D
11. D Atar PS Ramanujam K Saunamaki S Haunso 1994 Assessment of coronary artery stenosis pressure gradient by quantitative coronary arteriography in patients with coronary artery disease Clin Physiol 14 23-35 8149707 1:STN:280:ByuC1MbptlY%3D
12. B De Bruyne NH Pijls WJ Paulus PJ Vantrimpont SU Sys GR Heyndrickx 1993 Transstenotic coronary pressure gradient measurement in humans: In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a new pressure monitoring angioplasty guide wire Journal of the Am Coll Cardiol 22 119-126 1:STN:280:ByyB1cnivVI%3D
13. A Abizaid GS Mintz AD Pichard KM Kent LF Satler CL Walsh JJ Popma MB Leon 1998 Clinical, intravascular ultrasound, and quantitative angiographic determinants of the coronary flow reserve before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty Am J Cardiol 82 423-428 9723627 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00355-5 1:STN:280:DyaK1czovFShsg%3D%3D
14. JW Moses C Undermir JE Strain EM Kreps JE Higgins GW Gleim MJ Kern 1998 Relation between single tomographic intravascular ultrasound image parameters and intracoronary Doppler flow velocity in patients with intermediately severe coronary stenoses Am Heart J 135 988-994 9630102 10.1016/S0002-8703(98)70063-8 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3pt1Smtg%3D%3D
15. JH Reiber PW Serruys CJ Kooijman W Wijns CJ Slager JJ Gerbrands JC Schuurbiers A den Boer PG Hugenholtz 1985 Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms Circulation 71 280-288 3965172 1:STN:280:BiqD2svptlY%3D
16. JC Gurley SE Nissen DC Booth AN DeMaria 1992 Influence of operator- and patient-dependent variables on the suitability of automated quantitative coronary arteriography for routine clinical use J Am Coll Cardiol 19 1237-1243 1564224 1:STN:280:By2B38njslw%3D
17. Y Ozaki AG Violaris T Kobayashi D Keane E Camenzind C Di Mario P de Feyter JR Roelandt PW Serruys 1997 Comparison of coronary luminal quantification obtained from intracoronary ultrasound and both geometric and videodensitometric quantitative angiography before and after balloon angioplasty and directional atherectomy Circulation 96 491-499 9244217 1:STN:280:ByiA1cnjs1w%3D
18. C von Birgelen MJ Kutryk R Gil Y Ozaki C Di Mario JR Roelandt PJ de Feyter PW Serruys 1996 Quantification of the minimal luminal cross-sectional area after coronary stenting by two- and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound versus edge detection and videodensitometry Am J Cardiol 78 520-525 8806335 10.1016/ S0002-9149(96)00356-6 1:STN:280:BymA1MbpsF0%3D
19. J Bartunek SU Sys GR Heyndrickx NH Pijls B De Bruyne 1995 Quantitative coronary angiography in predicting functional significance of stenoses in an unselected patient cohort J Am Coll Cardiol 26 328-334 7608431 10.1016/0735-1097(95)80003-Y 1:STN:280:ByqA3s3mtVQ%3D
20. PP Leimgruber GS Roubin J Hollman GA Cotsonis B Meier JS Douglas SB King Jr AR Gruentzig 1986 Restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel disease Circulation 73 710-717 2936532 1:STN:280:BimC3svgsl0%3D
21. JM Hodgson S Reinert AS Most DO Williams 1986 Prediction of long-term clinical outcome with final translesional pressure gradient during coronary angioplasty Circulation 74 563-566 2943534 1:STN:280:BimB1MfpslY%3D
22. J Honye DJ Mahon A Jain CJ White SR Ramee JB Wallis A Al-Zarka JM Tobis 1992 Morphological effects of coronary balloon angioplasty in vivo assessed by intravascular ultrasound imaging Circulation 85 1012-1025 1537099 1:STN:280:By2C28vgtlM%3D