Effects of sex pheromone in electrostatic powder on mating behaviour by Lobesia botrana males

Journal of Applied Entomology

Volumn 131, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 303-310

  Nansen, C ^a,b   MacDonald, K M ^a,c   Rogers, C D ^a,c   Thomas, M ^d   Poppy, G M ^c   Baxter, I H ^a  

^a Exosect Limited   (United Kingdom)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^d Dow AgroSciences   (France)

Author keywords

Entostat; Mating disruption; Moth integrated pest management (IPM); Tortricidae

Indexed keywords

CALLING BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT; LABORATORY METHOD; MATING BEHAVIOR; MOTH; SEX PHEROMONE;

LEPIDOPTERA; LOBESIA BOTRANA; TORTRICIDAE;

EID: 34249822796     PISSN: 09312048     EISSN: 14390418     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01167.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anfora G, Tasin M, Bäckman AC, de Cristofaro A, Witzgall P, Ioriatti C, 2005. Attractiveness of year-old polyethylene Isonet sex pheromone dispensers for Lobesia botrana. Ent. Exp. Appl. 117, 201 207.
2. Armsworth CG, Baxter IH, Barton LEE, Poppy GM, Nansen C, 2006. Effects of adhesive powders on the mating and flight behavior of Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 99, 1194 1202.
3. Arn H, Rauscher S, Guerin P, Buser HR, 1988. Sex pheromone blends of three tortricid pests in European vineyards. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 21, 111 117.
4. Barton LEE, Armsworth CG, Baxter IH, Poppy GM, Gaunt LF, Nansen C, 2006. Adhesive powder uptake and transfer by Mediterranean fruit flies, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 130, 257 262.
5. Buser HR, Rauscher S, Arn H, 1974. Sex pheromone of Lobesia botrana: (E,Z,)-7,9-dodecadienyl acetate in the female grape vine moth. Z. Naturforsch. 29, 781 783.
6. Cardé RT, 1990. Principle of mating disruption. In : Behavior-modifying chemicals for insect management. Ed. by Ridgway RL, Silverstein RM, Inscoe M, Academic Press, London, UK, 241 265.
7. Cardé RT, Minks AK, 1995. Control of moth pests by mating disruption: successes and constraints. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40, 559 585.
8. Charmillot PJ, Pasquier D, 2000. Vers de la grappe: technique de confusion, lutte classique et dynamique des populations. Rev. Suisse Viticult. Arboricult. Horticult. 32, 315 320.
9. Charmillot PJ, Pasquier D, Schmid A, Emery S, de Montmollin A, Desbaillet C, Perrottet M, Bolay JM, Zuber M, 1997. Lutte par confusion contre les vers de la grappe eudémis et cochylis en Suisse. Rev. Suisse Viticult. Arboricult. Horticult. 29 291 299.
10. Charmillot PJ, Pasquier D, Zufferey E, Bovard A, 2001. Essai de lutte par confusion contre les vers de la grappe dans le vignoble du Dézaley en 1999 et 2000. Rev. Suisse Viticult. Arboricult. Horticult. 33, 247 251.
11. Charmillot PJ, Degen T, Pasquier D, Briand F, 2005. Nouveaux procédés à base de phéromones pour lutter contre les vers de la grappe. Rev. Suisse Viticult. Arboricult. Horticult. 37, 283 288.
12. El-Sayed A, Gödde J, Witzgall P, Arn H, 1999. Characterisation of pheromone blend for grapevine moth Lobesia botrana by using flight track recording. J. Chem. Ecol. 25, 389 400.
13. Gordon D, Zahavi T, Ansheleich L, Harel M, Ovadia S, Dunkelblum E, Harari AR, 2005. Mating disruption of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): effect of pheromone formulations and concentrations. J. Econ. Entomol. 98, 135 142.
14. Hommay DG, Gertz C, Kienlen JC, Pizzol J, Chavigny P, 2002. Comparison between the control efficacy of Trichogramma evanescens westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) and two Trichogramma cacoeciae Marchal strains against grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana Den. and Schiff.), depending on their release density. Biocont. Sci. Techn. 12, 569 581.
15. Ifoulis AA, Savopoulou-Soultani M, 2004. Biological control of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) larvae by using different formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis in 11 vine cultivars under field conditions. J. Econ. Entomol. 97, 340 343.
16. Ioriatti C, Bagnoli B, Lucchi A, Veronelli V, 2005. Vine moths control by mating disruption in Italy: results and future prospects. Redia LXXXVII, 117 128.
17. Kast WK, 2001. Twelve years of practical experience using mating disruption against Eupoecilia ambiguella and Lobesia botrana in vineyards of the Wuertemberg region, Germany. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 24, 71 73.
18. Knight AL, 1995. Evaluating pheromone emission and blend in disrupting sexual communication of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environ. Entomol. 24, 1396 1403.
19. Louis F, Schirra KJ, 2001. Mating disruption of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in vineyards with very high population densities. Bull. OILB/SROP 24, 75 79.
20. Louis F, Schmidt-Tiedemann A, Schirra KJ, 2002. Control of Sparganothis pilleriana Schiff. and Lobesia botrana Den. & Schiff. in German vineyards using sex pheromone-mediated mating disruption. Bull. OILB/SROP. 25, 51 58.
21. McKemey AR, Glen DM, Symondson WOC, 2004. How does a carabid predator find aggregations of slugs in the field? Electroantennograms and behavioural assays suggest chemical cues. Bull. Entomol. Res. 94, 235 244.
22. Milonas PG, 2005. Influence of initial egg density and host size on the development of the gregarious parasitoid Bracon hebetor on three different host species. Biocontrol 50, 415 428.
23. Moschos T, Souliotis C, Broumas T, Kapothanassi V, 2004. Control of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana in Greece by the mating disruption technique: a three-year survey. Phytoparasitica 32, 83 96.
24. Nansen C, Barton LEE, Nansen M, in press. Uptake, retention, and repellency of a potential carrier of active ingredients in crack and crevice treatments for stored grain beetles. J. Stored Prod. Res. In press.
25. Roehrich R, Boller E, 1991. Tortricids in vineyards. In : Tortricid pests their biology, natural enemies and control. Ed. by Van der Geest LPS, Evenhuis HH, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 507 514.
26. Roelofs W, Kochansky J, Cardè R, Arn H, 1973. Sex attractant of the grape vine moth, Lobesia botrana. Schweizerische Entomol. Gesellschaft 46, 71 73.
27. Rumbo ER, 1981. Study of single sensillium responses to pheromone in light brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana, using and averaging technique. Physiol. Entomol. 6, 87 98.
28. Sauer AE, Karg G, 1998. Variables affecting pheromone concentration in vineyards treated for mating disruption of grape vine moth, Lobesia botrana. J. Chem. Ecol. 24, 289 302.
29. Suckling DM, Karg G, Bradley SJ, 1996. Apple foliage enhances mating disruption of light brown apple moth. J. Chem. Ecol. 22, 325 341.
30. Torres-Vila LM, Rodrguez-Molina MC, Stockel J, 2002. Delayed mating reduces reproductive output of female European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 92, 241 249.
31. Van der Pers JNC, Minks AK, 1998. A portable electroantennogram sensor for routine measurements of pheromone concentrations in greenhouses. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 87, 209 215.
32. Varner M, Lucin R, Mattedi L, Forno F, 2001. Experience with mating disruption technique to control grape berry moth, Lobesia botrana, in Trentino. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 24, 81 88.
33. Witzgall P, Tasin M, Buser HR, Wegner-Kiß G, Mancebón MVS, Ioriatti C, Baickman AC, Francke W, 2005. New pheromone components of the grapevine moth Lobesia botrana. J. Chem. Ecol. 31, 2923 2932.