Using individual parcel assessments to improve stormwater management

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 149-160

  Keeley, Melissa ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION   (United States)

^b TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; STORMWATER; SURFACE WATER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

EID: 34249812106     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360708976149     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Arnold, C. L. & Gibbons, C. J. (1996). Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(2), 243-258.
2. Austen, W., Dittmann, H., & Hebig, S. (1998). Konzept zur Einführung getrennter Schmutzwasser- und Niederschlagswasserentgelte für das Entsorgungsgebiet der Berliner Wasserbetriebe [Concept for the establishment of a separated sanitary and stormwater rate for the Berlin Water Work's sewerage area]. Berlin: WIBERA Wirtschaftsberatung AG for the Berliner Wasserbetriebe.
3. Austen, W., Hebig, S., & Pohl, A. (1999). Zukünftige Kostenvertielung im Betriebsbereich Entwässerung der Berliner Wasserbetriebe zur Ermittlung getrennter Entgelte für die zentrale Entsorgung von Schmutz- und Niederschlagswasser [The future separation of the Berlin Water Work's sewerage costs: The determination of a separate rate for centralized sanitary and stormwater management]. Berlin: WIBERA Wirtschaftsberatung AG for the Berlin Wasserbetriebe.
4. Berke, P. R., MacDonald, J., White, N., Holmes, M., Line, D., Oury, K., et al. (2003). Greening development to protect watersheds: Does new urbanism make a difference? Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(4), 397-413.
5. Berliner Wasserbetriebe. (2005). Preise. [Prices]. Retrieved October 14, 2005, from http://www.bwb.de/deutsch/unternehmen/ preise.html
6. Börner, W. (2003). Abgabenrechtliche Aspekte und Gesplittete Abwassergebühren; Rechtsgrundlagen, Umsetzung in die Praxis, Berliner Erfahrungen [Tax law and separated sewerage charges; legal foundation, practical implementation, and Berlin's experiences]. Unpublished paper from Nachhaltige Regenwasserbewirtschaftung in Siedlungen, 456. Kurs des Institituts für Städtebau Berlin Sustainable Stormwater Management in Developments, the 456th Session of the Berlin Institute for Urban Planning.
7. Braden, J. B., & Johnston, D. M. (2004). Downstream economic benefits from storm-water management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 130(6), 498-502.
8. Brown, D. S. G. (2002). User fee-based financing in the 2000s. Stormwater, 3(1), 50-54.
9. Bundesverband der deutschen Gas- und Wasserwirtschaft, & (ATV-DVWK) Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfalle e.V. (2003). Marktdaten Abwasser 2003; Ergebnisse der gemeinsamen Umfrage zur Abwasserentsorgung [Sewerage market data 2003: Results of a joint survey of sewerage management]. Retrieved October 1, 2005, from http://www.dwa.de/download/ marktdaten-abwasser_2003.pdf
10. Busco, D., & Lindsey, G. (2001). Designing stormwater user fees: Issues and options. Stormwater, 2(7), 42-44.
11. Center for Urban Policy and the Environment. (2002). An internet guide to financing stormwater management; Case studies. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://stormwaterfinance.urbancenter.iupui.edu/case%20studies.htm
12. City of Columbus, OH, Division of Sewerage and Drainage. (2005). Sanitary sewer and stormwater rates. Retrieved October 14, 2005, from http://utilities.ci.columbus.oh.us/sewers_drains/rates.htm
13. City of Issiquah, WA. (2005) Utility rates and fees. Retrieved October 14, 2005, from http://www.ci.issaquah.wa.us/ page.asp?navid=455
14. City of Orlando, FL. (2005) Stormwater utility fee. Retrieved October 14, 2005, from http://www.cityoforlando.net/ public_works/stormwater/fee.htm
15. City of Raleigh, NC. (2005). Utility rates. Retrieved October 14, 2005 from, http://www.raleighnc.gov/portal/server.pt/gateway/ PTARGS_0_2_306_202_0_43/http%3B/pt03/DIG_Web_Content/category/Resident/ Stormwater/Utility_Information/ Cat-1C-20041129-130545-Stormwater_Utility_Rates.html
16. City of Topeka, KS. (2005). Utility rates. Retrieved October 14, 2005 from, http://www.topeka.org/publicworks/ utility_rates.shtml
17. Clarkson, H. E. (2003). Creating a stormwater utility with near-zero opposition. Stormwater, 4(4), 62-69.
18. Coffman, L. S., Goo, R., & Frederick, R. (1999). Low-impact development: An innovative alternative approach to stormwater management. In: E. M. Wilson (Ed.), Preparing for the 21st century: Proceedings from the 29th Annual Water Resources Planning and Management Conference, June 6-9, 1999, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, p. 118.
19. Collins, P. S. (1996). Financing the future of storm water. Civil Engineering, 66(3), 64-66.
20. Dahme, J., & Smullen, J. T. (2000). Innovative strategy helps Philadelphia manage combined sewer overflow. Stormwater, 1(1), 52-62.
21. Die Stadt Bonn. (2005). Vom Umgang mit Regenwasser [Dealing with stormwater]. Die Oberbürgermeisterin der Bundesstadt Bonn: Germany. Retrieved February 27, 2007 from http://www.bonn.de/imperia/md/ content/umweltundgesundheit-planen-bauenundwohnen/umweltamt/ regenwasserbroschuere.pdf
22. Diwisch, S. (2000). Versieglungsgebührenmodell in Giessen. [Impervious surface rate structure in Giessen]. In T. Seelig-Morell, and U. Thorweihe (Eds.), InfoForum Regenwasser-management [InfoForum Stormwater Management], November 9-10, 2000 (pp. 25-30). Berlin, Germany: GeoAgentur Berlin Brandenburg.
23. Doll, A., & Lindsey, G. (1999). Credits bring economic incentives for onsite stormwater management. Watershed and Wet Weather Technical Bulletin, 4(1), 12-15.
24. Duncan, R. (2001). Selecting the "right" stormwater utility rate model - An adventure in political and contextual sensitivity. In: D. Phelps & G. Sehlke (Eds.), Bridging the gap: Meeting the world's water and environmental resources challenges. Proceedings of the World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, May 20-24, 2001 (pp. 1-9). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
25. Fachvereinigung für Bauwerkbegrünung e.V. (2007). Ergebnisse FBB-Umfrage [Results of the FBB questionnaire]. Retrieved February 25, 2007, from http://www.fbb.de/Folgeseiten/ Foerderung.html
26. Florida Stormwater Association. (2003). Establishing a stormwater utility, 2003 edition. Retrieved October 15, 2005, from http://www.florida-stormwater.org/manual/sitemap.html
27. Golgowski, G., & Dowling, A. (1985). Review of approaches and techniques used to assist in financing the retrofitting of existing urban storm drain systems. Maitland, FL: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council.
28. Haller, B. (1998). Information zu gesplitteten Abwassergebühr - Erfahrungen aus Baden-Württemburg [Information about separated wastewater fees - Experiences of Baden-Württemburg]. In Symposium Regenwasser - Entsorgungs- und Gebührenmodelle, Band 5 Stormwater Symposium - Management and Fee Models, Vol. 51. Cottbus, Germany: Fach Siedlungswasserwirtschaft und Gewässerschutz.
29. Hennig, B. (2000). Getrennte Entgelte für Schmutz- und Niederschlagswasser in Berlin [Separated rates for sanitary sewerage and stormwater in Berlin]. In T. Seelig-Morell, and U. Thorweihe (Eds.), InfoForum Regenwasser-management [InfoForum Stormwater Management], November 9-10, 2000 (pp. 19-24). Berlin, Germany: GeoAgentur Berlin Brandenburg.
30. Hennig, B. (2002). Projekt Entgeltsplitting; Management-Summary, Detaillierter Abschlussbericht [The rate separation project: Management summary and detailed final report]. Berlin, Germany: Berliner Wasserbetriebe.
31. Hull, P. (2000). NPDES Phase II: The next phase. Erosion Control Journal, 7(1), 40-47.
32. Institute for Water Resources. (1991). Financing stormwater facilities: A utility approach. Chicago, IL: American Public Works Association.
33. Kaspersen, J. (2000). The stormwater utility, will it work for your community? Stormwater, 1(1), 22-28. [Accessed February 27, 2007 at http://www.forester.net/sw_0011_utility.html]
34. Keeley, M. (2004). Green roofs incentives: Tried and true techniques from Europe. In Green Roofs for Healthy Cities, Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Green Roofs for Healthy Cities Conference [CD-ROM]. Toronto: Green Roofs for Healthy Cities.
35. Keeley, M. (2005). Green roofs and the green area factor. In Green Roofs for Healthy Cities, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Green Roofs for Healthy Cities Conference [CD-ROM]. Toronto: Green Roofs for Healthy Cities.
36. Knust, M., Lischke, V., & Hennig, B. (2000). Einführung des Niederschlagswasserentgeltes in Berlin auf der Basis einer GIS-gestützten Flächenerfassung [Establishment of Berlin's stormwater rate model utilizing GIS-supported area analysis]. KA-Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser, Abfall, 47(4), 555-559.
37. Köhler, M., & Keeley, M. (2005). The green roof tradition in Germany: The example of Berlin. In EarthPledge Foundation (Ed.), Green roofs: Ecological design and construction. New York: Schiffer.
38. Kraemer, A., Paulussen, S., & Lohaus, J. (2000). Abwassergebühren in Europa; Internationale Konferenz in Berlin [Sewerage fees in Europe; summary of an international conference in Berlin]. KA-Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser, Abfall, 47(3), 320-326.
39. Land Info Worldwide Mapping LLC. (2006). Satellite imagery. Retrieved May 18, 2006, from http://www.landinfo.com/ products_satellite.htm
40. Lee, J. G., & Heaney, J. P. (2003). Estimation of urban imperviousness and its impacts on storm water systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 129(5), 419-426.
41. Marsalek, J., & Chocat, B. (2002). International report: Stormwater management. Water Science and Technology, 46(6-7), 1-17.
42. Parikh, P., Taylor, M. A., Hoagland, T., Thurston, H., & Shuster, W. (2005). Application of market mechanisms and incentives to reduce stormwater runoff: An integrated hydrologic, economic and legal approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 8(2), 133-144.
43. Perez-Pedini, C., Linbrunner, J. F., & Vogel, R. M. (2005). Optimal location of infiltration-based best management practices for storm water management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 131(6), 441-448.
44. Pitt, R., Maestré, A., Morquecho, R., Brown, T., Swann, C., Cappiellea, K., et al. (2003). Evaluation of NPDES phase 1 municipal stormwater monitoring data (EPA/625/R-03/003). In National Conference on Urban Stormwater: Enhancing the Programs at the Local Level, p. 306-327.
45. Priede, N. (1990). Stormwater management through user fees. American City and County, 105(10), 38-42.
46. Scholl, J. E. (1991). Stormwater management utility billing structure. Water Environment and Technology, 3(11), 47-49.
47. Shackelford, A. K., & Davis, C. H. (2003). A combined fuzzy pixel-based and object-based approach for classification of high-resolution multispectral data over urban areas. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(10), 2354-2346.
48. Stadtetwässerungsbetriebe Köln, AöR. (2005). Die Gebuehren [The fees]. Retrieved October 14, 2005, from http://www.stadtentwaesserungsbetriebe-koeln.de/gebuehren.php
49. Steenbock, R. (1997). Emphalungen für Kalkulationvorschriften in den Kommunalabgabengesetzen der Länder [Recommended state calculation regulations for municipal utility rate structures]. Korespondenz Abwasser, 44(2), 723-727.
50. Stone, B. Jr. (2004). Paving over paradise: How land use regulations promote residential imperviousness. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(1), 101-113.
51. Thurston, H. W. (2006). Opportunity costs of residential best management practices for stormwater runoff control. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 132(2), 89-96.
52. Thurston, H. W., Goddard, H. C., Szlag, D., & Lemberg, B. (2003). Controlling storm-water runoff with tradable allowances for impervious surfaces. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 129(5), 409-418.
53. Tietenberg, T. H. (2003). Environmental and natural resource economics (6th ed.). Boston: Addison Wesley.
54. Trauth, K. M. (2001). A role for remote sensing information in storm water planning and management. Clean Technologies and Enviranmental Policy, 6(4), 268-281.
55. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1998). Clean water action plan: Restoring and protecting America's waters. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
56. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. (2000a). The national water quality inventory report to Congress, 2000 Water Quality Report (305(b) report). Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.
57. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. (2000b). Low impact development (LID): A literature review (EPA-841-B-00-005) Retrieved February 23, 2007 from http://www.epa.gov/ owow/nps/lid/lid.pdf
58. U.S. Federal Reserve. (2002). Federal Reserve statistical release G.5A: Foreign exchange rates (annual). Accessed February 27, 2007 at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g5a/20020102/
59. Wagner, W. (1999a). Anteil der Kosten für die Behandlung und Ableitung des Regenwassers im Mischsystem; Teil 1: Grundlagen und Kosten der Abwasserreinigung [Separating the costs of conveyance and treatment of stormwater in combined sewers; Part 1: Overview and costs of wastewater treatment]. GWF Wasser Abwasser, 140(4), 259-266.
60. Wagner, W. (1999b). Anteil der Kosten für die Behandlung und Ableitung des Regenwassers im Mischsystem; Teil 2: Kosten der Abwasserreinigung und Gesamtkostenbetrachtung [Separating the costs of conveyance and treatment of stormwater in combined sewers; Part 2: Costs of stormwater treatment and analysis of total costs]. GWF Wasser Abwasser, 140(5), 350-354.
61. Wollgam, W. (1998). Gebühren model der Stadt Cottbus für Regenwasser [The city of Cottbus' stormwater fee model]. In Symposium Regenwasser - Entsorgungs- und Gebührenmodelle, Band 5 Stormwater Symposium Management and Fee Models, Vol. 51. Cottbus, Germany: Fach Siedlungswasserwirtschaft und Gewässerschutz.
62. Woolson, E. (2004). Stormwater Utilities: Where do they stand now? Stormwater, 5(6), 12-23.