Designing a proposal review process to facilitate interdisciplinary research

Research Evaluation

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 13-21

  Shimada, Kazuyoshi ^a   Akagi, Mitsuo ^a   Kazamaki, Tohru ^a   Kobayashi, Shinichi ^b  

^a Takeda Foundation   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249810062     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/095820207X190647     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Council for Science and Technology Policy, Japan 2005. The Third Science and Technology Basic Plan (FY2006-FY2010), 27 December 2005. 〈http://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/basic/index.html#third〉, last accessed 10 March 2007.
2. EURAB, European Union Research Advisory Board 2004. Interdisciplinarity in Research (EURAB04.009-FINAL), April. 〈http://ec.europa.eu/research/eurab/pdf/ eurab_04_009_interdisciplinarity_research_final.pdf〉, last accessed 10 March 2007.
3. Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott and Martin Trow 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: the Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
4. Laudel, Grit 2006. Conclave in the Tower of Babel: how peers review interdisciplinary research proposals, Research Evaluation, 15(1), April, 57-68.
5. Laudel, Grit and Gloria Origgi eds. 2006. Special issue on the assessment of interdisciplinary research. Research Evaluation, 15(1), April, 1-80.
6. Maasen, Sabine, Martin Lengwiler and Michael Guggenheim eds. 2006. Special issue on discipline and research: practices of inter-/transdisciplinary cooperation in science. Science and Public Policy, 33(6), July, 393-476.
7. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine of the National Academies 2005. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
8. Thompson Klein, J, W Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R Haberi, A Bill, R W Scholz and M Welti eds. 2001. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology and Society. An Effective Way for Managing Complexity. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag. 2006. Science and Public Policy, 33(9), November.