Rationing in the NHS

British Medical Journal

Volumn 334, Issue 7603, 2007, Pages 1068-1069

  Klein, Rudolf ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET; CANCER; EDITORIAL; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; UNITED KINGDOM; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 34249809731     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39218.599109.80     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. British Medical Association. A rational way forward for the NHS in England: a discussion paper outlining an alternative approach to health reform. London: BMA, 2007. www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/ Content/ rationalwayforward.
2. Ham C, Coulter A. Conclusion: where are we now? In: Coulter A, Ham C, eds. The global challenge of health care rationing. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000:233-50.
3. Jacobs LR, Marmor T, Oberlander J. The political paradox of rationing: the case of the Oregon health plan. Cambridge, MA: John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 1998: occasional paper 5-98.
4. Iqbal Z, Pryce A, Afza M. Rationalizing rationing in health care: experience of two primary care trusts. J Public Health 2006;28: 125-32.
5. Wilson E, Sussex J, Macleod C, Fordham R. Prioritizing health technologies in a primary care trust. J Health Serv Res Policy 2007;12:80-5.
6. King's Fund. Local variations in NHS spending priorities. London: King's Fund, 2006. www.kingsfund.org.uk/resources/briefings/ local_variations.html.
7. Wells J, Cheong-Leen C. NICE appraisals should be everybody's business. BMJ 2007;334:936-8.
8. Day P, Klein R. Governance of foundation trusts. London: Nuffield Trust, 2005. www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/ecomm/files/100605governance. pdf.
9. Day P, Klein R. The politics of scrutiny. London: Nuffield Trust, 2007.
10. Daniels N. Accountability for reasonableness: establishing a fair process for priority setting is easierthan agreeing on principles. BMJ 2000;321:1300-1.